Study
User-Centred DesignNew This WeekStrong effect

Co-designing Equitable Healthcare Access for Black Individuals with IDD

Collaborative research involving individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), their care partners, and healthcare providers is crucial for understanding and addressing systemic inequities in healthcare access.

Progress in community health partnerships · 2025

01

Key Findings

  • 01Delayed recruitment and power-sharing are significant challenges in collaborative research.
  • 02Equitable and inclusive engagement strategies are essential for meaningful participation.
  • 03Co-reflexivity is vital for real-time assessment and adjustment of engagement processes.
  • 04Inclusive dissemination strategies are necessary to share research outcomes effectively.
02

Application

Design takeaway

Designers should adopt a co-creation approach, actively partnering with end-users and stakeholders from the outset to ensure solutions are relevant, accessible, and equitable.

How to apply

When designing healthcare services or technologies for specific populations, initiate partnerships with community representatives and end-users early in the design process to gather authentic insights and ensure equitable outcomes.

Project actions

  • 01When selecting participants for your design project, ensure representation from diverse backgrounds and consider involving support persons or caregivers.
  • 02Develop clear protocols for power-sharing and equitable contribution within your research or design team.
03

Method & Evidence

AimHow can participatory action research models be effectively implemented to address systemic inequities in healthcare access for Black individuals with IDD and their care partners?
MethodCritical participatory action research
ProcedureResearchers collaborated with individuals with IDD, their care partners, and healthcare providers, employing semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and interactive activities to gather insights on healthcare access challenges and potential solutions.
ContextHealthcare access for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, specifically focusing on the intersection of race and disability.

Variables

IVCollaborative research approach (participatory action research vs. traditional research)
DVEquitable healthcare access and use
CVIntersectionality of race, disability, and gender; healthcare system context
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Emphasizes the value of lived experience in research.
  • +Provides practical strategies for managing challenges in collaborative research.

Limitations

Recruiting and engaging participants from marginalized communities can be time-consuming and require specialized outreach strategies.

Reliability & validity

The validity of the findings relies heavily on the depth of participant engagement and the researchers' ability to accurately capture and interpret their experiences. Reliability is enhanced through triangulation of data from interviews and focus groups.

Think critically

How might the power dynamics inherent in academic research influence the findings and recommendations when studying marginalized communities?

05

Design Principles

"Prioritize inclusive co-design by actively involving diverse user groups and their support networks throughout the entire design lifecycle."

This research highlights the critical need to move beyond traditional research methods and actively involve diverse user groups in the design process. By co-creating knowledge, design teams can develop more effective and equitable solutions that truly meet the needs of marginalized communities.

06

What This Means for Your Design

To make healthcare fairer for Black people with disabilities, researchers and designers need to work *with* them and their families, not just study them. This means listening to their experiences and making them part of the solution-finding process.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Reference this study when discussing the importance of user involvement and co-design in addressing complex societal issues within your design project.
  • 2.Use the findings to justify the inclusion of specific user groups and participatory methods in your research approach.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

(2025). Systemic Inequities in Health Care: Lessons Learned From Black People With IDD and Their Care Partners. Progress in community health partnerships. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2025.a970151 Retrieved from https://designdex.org/study/04fcae75-ba0a-4049-9c3c-0f37f8571aa5/co-designing-equitable-healthcare-access-for-black-individuals-with-idd

Paragraph starter

This research underscores the critical importance of employing participatory action research methodologies to address systemic inequities. By actively involving Black individuals with IDD and their care partners in the research process, the study highlights strategies for equitable engagement, power-sharing, and co-creation of knowledge, which are essential for developing truly user-centered and effective healthcare solutions.

09

Source

Progress in community health partnerships

Systemic Inequities in Health Care: Lessons Learned From Black People With IDD and Their Care Partners

journal · 2025

View source

Questions about this research

What does the research say about co-designing equitable healthcare access for black individuals with idd?
Designers should adopt a co-creation approach, actively partnering with end-users and stakeholders from the outset to ensure solutions are relevant, accessible, and equitable. Evidence: Progress in community health partnerships (2025).
Why does "Co-designing Equitable Healthcare Access for Black Individuals with IDD" matter for design?
This research highlights the critical need to move beyond traditional research methods and actively involve diverse user groups in the design process. By co-creating knowledge, design teams can develop more effective and equitable solutions that truly meet the needs of marginalized communities.
How can designers apply this research?
Designers should adopt a co-creation approach, actively partnering with end-users and stakeholders from the outset to ensure solutions are relevant, accessible, and equitable.
What were the main findings?
Delayed recruitment and power-sharing are significant challenges in collaborative research.. Equitable and inclusive engagement strategies are essential for meaningful participation.. Co-reflexivity is vital for real-time assessment and adjustment of engagement processes.. Inclusive dissemination strategies are necessary to share research outcomes effectively.
What research method was used?
Critical participatory action research.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2025 journal from Progress in community health partnerships.
What should I do differently in my next project?
When designing healthcare services or technologies for specific populations, initiate partnerships with community representatives and end-users early in the design process to gather authentic insights and ensure equitable outcomes.
What are the limitations?
The specific challenges encountered in recruitment and engagement may vary depending on the community and context.
Is there evidence that equitable affects design outcomes?
The study found that involving diverse stakeholders, including those with lived experience, in the research process is key to uncovering and addressing systemic barriers in healthcare. Effective collaboration requires proactive strategies to manage recruitment, ensure equitable participation, and foster mutual understa Source: Progress in community health partnerships (2025).
Where does this co-designing equitable research apply?
Healthcare access for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, specifically focusing on the intersection of race and disability. It sits within user-centred design research on designdex.org.

Related research topics

equitable design research · evidence on equitable · does equitable improve design outcomes · co-designing equitable studies for designers · equitable and co-designing equitable findings · user-centred design research evidence