Short answer

Designers should actively seek to understand and mitigate the impact of their work on all living systems, not just human users.

Field
Classic Design
Source
Exchanges The Interdisciplinary Research Journal (2023)
Method
Conceptual exploration and discourse analysis
Evidence
Moderate effect

Designers must consider the broader ecological and non-human systems impacted by their creations, moving beyond a purely human-centric approach. This classic design research insight is drawn from a 2023 study published in Exchanges The Interdisciplinary Research Journal. Using Conceptual exploration and discourse analysis, researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: Designers should actively seek to understand and mitigate the impact of their work on all living systems, not just human users.

Study
Classic DesignRecentModerate effect

Designing for a 'More-Than-Human' World

Designers must consider the broader ecological and non-human systems impacted by their creations, moving beyond a purely human-centric approach.

Exchanges The Interdisciplinary Research Journal · 2023

01

Key Findings

  • 01The terms 'multispecies' and 'more-than-human' highlight the complex and interconnected nature of ecological systems.
  • 02Addressing planetary challenges requires a shift away from anthropocentric design thinking.
02

Application

Design takeaway

Designers should actively seek to understand and mitigate the impact of their work on all living systems, not just human users.

How to apply

When designing any product or system, consider its lifecycle impact on biodiversity, resource depletion, and pollution, and explore how it can positively contribute to ecological health.

Project actions

  • 01When defining the scope of your design project, consider including non-human stakeholders.
  • 02Research the ecological impact of materials and manufacturing processes.
03

Method & Evidence

AimHow can design practice evolve to incorporate the needs and impacts on non-human entities and ecosystems?
MethodConceptual exploration and discourse analysis
ProcedureThe research involved a workshop and subsequent discussion among interdisciplinary early-career researchers to explore and define terms like 'multispecies' and 'more-than-human' in the context of the Anthropocene.
ContextInterdisciplinary environmental humanities and design research

Variables

IVDesign approach (anthropocentric vs. more-than-human)
DVEcological impact, system resilience
CVProduct/system type, intended human use
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Highlights a critical gap in traditional design thinking.
  • +Encourages interdisciplinary collaboration.

Limitations

It can be challenging to quantify the needs or impacts on non-human entities.

Reliability & validity

The findings are based on conceptual discussions and may lack empirical reliability and validity in terms of direct design application.

Think critically

How can we ethically and practically represent the 'needs' of non-human entities in a design process?

05

Design Principles

"Design with ecological interdependence in mind."

In an era of significant environmental challenges, traditional design practices that prioritize human needs exclusively can inadvertently harm ecosystems. Embracing a 'more-than-human' perspective encourages the development of products and systems that are more integrated with, and less detrimental to, the natural world.

06

What This Means for Your Design

Think about how your design affects animals, plants, and the environment, not just people.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Use this research to justify a broader scope for your design project, including environmental impact assessments.
  • 2.Incorporate 'more-than-human' considerations into your design brief and evaluation criteria.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

Paragraph starter

This research highlights the necessity of moving beyond anthropocentric design frameworks. By considering 'more-than-human' entanglements, designers can develop solutions that are more ecologically responsible and contribute to the well-being of all life forms, which is essential for addressing contemporary environmental challenges.

09

Source

Exchanges The Interdisciplinary Research Journal

Multispecies, More-Than-Human, Nonhuman, Other-Than-Human

journal · 2023

View source

Questions About This Research

What does the research say about designing for a 'more-than-human' world?
Designers should actively seek to understand and mitigate the impact of their work on all living systems, not just human users. Evidence: Exchanges The Interdisciplinary Research Journal (2023).
Why does "Designing for a 'More-Than-Human' World" matter for design?
In an era of significant environmental challenges, traditional design practices that prioritize human needs exclusively can inadvertently harm ecosystems. Embracing a 'more-than-human' perspective encourages the development of products and systems that are more integrated with, and less detrimental to, the natural world.
How can designers apply this research?
Designers should actively seek to understand and mitigate the impact of their work on all living systems, not just human users.
What were the main findings?
The terms 'multispecies' and 'more-than-human' highlight the complex and interconnected nature of ecological systems.. Addressing planetary challenges requires a shift away from anthropocentric design thinking.
What research method was used?
Conceptual exploration and discourse analysis.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Moderate effect, based on a 2023 journal from Exchanges The Interdisciplinary Research Journal.
What should I do differently in my next project?
When designing any product or system, consider its lifecycle impact on biodiversity, resource depletion, and pollution, and explore how it can positively contribute to ecological health.
What are the limitations?
The terms are complex and can be difficult to operationalize in concrete design decisions.