Short answer

Integrate a circular economy indicator framework into the early stages of product and system design to ensure alignment with regenerative principles and measurable progress.

Field
Resource Management
Source
International Journal of Production Research (2018)
Method
Case Study and Framework Development
Sample
13 organizations (9 multinational, 4 leading companies)
Evidence
Strong effect

A structured framework, integrating the Ellen MacArthur Foundation's butterfly model, can effectively link circular economy goals to measurable indicators within supply chains. This resource management research insight is drawn from a 2018 study published in International Journal of Production Research. Using Case study and framework development with 13 organizations (9 multinational, 4 leading companies), researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: Integrate a circular economy indicator framework into the early stages of product and system design to ensure alignment with regenerative principles and measurable progress.

Study
Resource ManagementHigh ImpactStrong effect

Circular Economy Indicators: A Framework for Regenerative Supply Chains

A structured framework, integrating the Ellen MacArthur Foundation's butterfly model, can effectively link circular economy goals to measurable indicators within supply chains.

International Journal of Production Research · 2018

01

Key Findings

  • 01Existing practices for developing circular economy indicators vary significantly across organizations.
  • 02A systems-level overview, such as the butterfly model, is essential for creating comprehensive and interconnected indicators.
  • 03Indicators need to reflect key goals and principles of the circular economy, including material recovery, value loops, and reduced emissions.
  • 04Circular economy practices present new opportunities and challenges for competitive advantage, necessitating supply chain redesign and tailored indicator development.
02

Application

Design takeaway

Integrate a circular economy indicator framework into the early stages of product and system design to ensure alignment with regenerative principles and measurable progress.

How to apply

When designing a new product or service, map out its material inputs, energy use, waste outputs, and potential for reuse, remanufacturing, or recycling. Then, develop specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) indicators to track performance against these circularity goals.

Project actions

  • 01When defining your project's goals, consider how you will measure your success in terms of circularity.
  • 02Use systems thinking to map out the flows of materials and energy in your design project.
  • 03Research existing frameworks for measuring sustainability and circularity.
03

Method & Evidence

AimHow can a framework be developed to create circular economy indicators that align with core goals, principles, and building blocks of a circular economy, utilizing the Ellen MacArthur Foundation's butterfly model?
MethodCase Study and Framework Development
ProcedureThe research involved analyzing the practices of nine multinational organizations and four leading companies engaged in circular economy activities. This analysis informed the development of a framework for creating circular economy indicators, drawing upon the Ellen MacArthur Foundation's butterfly model to represent material flows and value loops.
Sample13 organizations (9 multinational, 4 leading companies)
ContextSupply chain management and circular economy implementation in multinational corporations.

Variables

IVFramework for developing CE indicators
DVEffectiveness and alignment of CE indicators
CVOrganizational context, industry sector, existing CE practices
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Provides a structured approach to indicator development.
  • +Integrates a widely recognized systems model (butterfly diagram).
  • +Based on empirical evidence from multiple organizations.

Limitations

Gathering accurate data for all material flows and value loops can be challenging, especially for complex supply chains.

Reliability & validity

The study's reliability is supported by its use of multiple case studies. Validity is enhanced by linking the framework to established models like the butterfly diagram and by grounding recommendations in observed organizational practices.

Think critically

How might the 'value loops' mentioned in the abstract be quantified and integrated into a practical design decision-making process?

05

Design Principles

"Design for Circularity: Develop products and systems with a clear understanding of their material flows, recovery potential, and value retention throughout their lifecycle, supported by relevant performance indicators."

Developing robust indicators is crucial for organizations to track progress, communicate impact, and identify opportunities for improvement in circular economy initiatives. This framework provides a systematic approach to ensure indicators are aligned with core circular economy principles and business objectives.

06

What This Means for Your Design

To make sure a company is truly being 'circular' (reusing and recycling as much as possible), we need good ways to measure it. This research suggests a way to create these measurements by looking at how materials and value flow through the whole supply chain, like a system.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Reference this research when discussing the importance of metrics and measurement in your design process, particularly for circular economy or sustainability goals.
  • 2.Use the concept of a 'regenerative supply chain' to frame your project's approach to resource management.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

Paragraph starter

The development of effective circular economy indicators is crucial for monitoring progress and driving regenerative supply chains. Research by Howard, Hopkinson, and Miemczyk (2018) proposes a framework that links indicators to core circular economy principles by utilizing systems-level models like the Ellen MacArthur Foundation's butterfly diagram. This approach allows for a comprehensive understanding of material and value flows, enabling organizations to measure their performance against key circularity goals and identify opportunities for competitive advantage.

09

Source

International Journal of Production Research

The regenerative supply chain: a framework for developing circular economy indicators

journal · 2018

View source

Questions About This Research

What does the research say about circular economy indicators: a framework for regenerative supply chains?
Integrate a circular economy indicator framework into the early stages of product and system design to ensure alignment with regenerative principles and measurable progress. Evidence: International Journal of Production Research (2018).
Why does "Circular Economy Indicators: A Framework for Regenerative Supply Chains" matter for design?
Developing robust indicators is crucial for organizations to track progress, communicate impact, and identify opportunities for improvement in circular economy initiatives. This framework provides a systematic approach to ensure indicators are aligned with core circular economy principles and business objectives.
How can designers apply this research?
Integrate a circular economy indicator framework into the early stages of product and system design to ensure alignment with regenerative principles and measurable progress.
What were the main findings?
Existing practices for developing circular economy indicators vary significantly across organizations.. A systems-level overview, such as the butterfly model, is essential for creating comprehensive and interconnected indicators.. Indicators need to reflect key goals and principles of the circular economy, including material recovery, value loops, and reduced emissions.. Circular economy practices present new opportunities and challenges for competitive advantage, necessitating supply chain redesign and tailored indicator development.
What research method was used?
Case Study and Framework Development with 13 organizations (9 multinational, 4 leading companies).
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2018 journal from International Journal of Production Research.
What should I do differently in my next project?
When designing a new product or service, map out its material inputs, energy use, waste outputs, and potential for reuse, remanufacturing, or recycling. Then, develop specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) indicators to track performance against these circularity goals.
What are the limitations?
The framework's applicability may vary depending on the specific industry, organizational maturity in circular economy adoption, and the availability of data.