Short answer
When designing for complex systems, actively seek opportunities to collaborate with other organizations, even across different sectors, to build greater resilience.
- Field
- Innovation & Design
- Source
- Amsterdam University Press eBooks (2014)
- Method
- Conceptual analysis and collaborative research initiative.
- Evidence
- Moderate effect
Multinational corporations can significantly enhance global resilience by collaborating on complex, interconnected systems. This innovation & design research insight is drawn from a 2014 study published in Amsterdam University Press eBooks. Using Conceptual analysis and collaborative research initiative., researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: When designing for complex systems, actively seek opportunities to collaborate with other organizations, even across different sectors, to build greater resilience.
Corporate Collaboration Drives Systemic Resilience
Multinational corporations can significantly enhance global resilience by collaborating on complex, interconnected systems.
Amsterdam University Press eBooks · 2014
Key Findings
- 01Multinational corporations possess the resources, reach, and information-processing capabilities to significantly impact global resilience.
- 02Collaboration among corporations is crucial for developing and implementing resilient systems.
- 03An 'enlightened self-interest' can drive corporate engagement in building a more resilient world.
Application
Design takeaway
When designing for complex systems, actively seek opportunities to collaborate with other organizations, even across different sectors, to build greater resilience.
How to apply
In your design project, identify a complex problem (e.g., waste reduction, sustainable energy) and brainstorm how different types of companies could collaborate to create a more resilient solution.
Project actions
- 01Consider the 'big picture' of how your design fits into larger systems.
- 02Think about who else could be involved in making your design more successful and resilient.
Method & Evidence
Variables
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- +Focuses on the unique capabilities of multinational corporations.
- +Emphasizes the necessity of collaboration for systemic resilience.
Limitations
This research focuses on large corporations; smaller businesses or non-profits might have different approaches to resilience.
Reliability & validity
The findings are based on a conceptual exploration and collaborative initiative rather than empirical testing, making direct measures of reliability and validity challenging. The strength lies in the expert perspectives of the participating corporations.
Think critically
To what extent can 'enlightened self-interest' truly drive meaningful, long-term corporate collaboration on resilience, or are external regulations and pressures more critical?
Design Principles
"Systemic collaboration is a key strategy for enhancing resilience in interconnected global challenges."
This research highlights the potential for large organizations to leverage their resources and influence to address systemic challenges like climate change and resource scarcity. By working together, corporations can move beyond individual efforts to create more robust and adaptable systems for the future.
What This Means for Your Design
Big companies can help make the world more stable and ready for problems like climate change if they work together.
How to use in your project
- 1.Reference this research when discussing the importance of collaboration and systemic thinking in your design project's context or evaluation.
Add to My Project
Quick Cite
Paragraph starter
The research by Kupers (2014) highlights the significant role multinational corporations can play in fostering global resilience through collaboration. This perspective is valuable for understanding how interconnected systems, such as food, water, and energy, can be made more robust by leveraging the resources and influence of major industry players working in concert.
Source
Amsterdam University Press eBooks
Turbulence: A Corporate Perspective on Collaborating for Resilience
journal · 2014
View sourceQuestions About This Research
- What does the research say about corporate collaboration drives systemic resilience?
- When designing for complex systems, actively seek opportunities to collaborate with other organizations, even across different sectors, to build greater resilience. Evidence: Amsterdam University Press eBooks (2014).
- Why does "Corporate Collaboration Drives Systemic Resilience" matter for design?
- This research highlights the potential for large organizations to leverage their resources and influence to address systemic challenges like climate change and resource scarcity. By working together, corporations can move beyond individual efforts to create more robust and adaptable systems for the future.
- How can designers apply this research?
- When designing for complex systems, actively seek opportunities to collaborate with other organizations, even across different sectors, to build greater resilience.
- What were the main findings?
- Multinational corporations possess the resources, reach, and information-processing capabilities to significantly impact global resilience.. Collaboration among corporations is crucial for developing and implementing resilient systems.. An 'enlightened self-interest' can drive corporate engagement in building a more resilient world.
- What research method was used?
- Conceptual analysis and collaborative research initiative..
- How strong is the evidence?
- Evidence strength is rated Moderate effect, based on a 2014 journal from Amsterdam University Press eBooks.
- What should I do differently in my next project?
- In your design project, identify a complex problem (e.g., waste reduction, sustainable energy) and brainstorm how different types of companies could collaborate to create a more resilient solution.
- What are the limitations?
- The perspective is primarily corporate, and may not fully capture the nuances of other stakeholder contributions or potential conflicts.