Short answer
Prioritize the design of agricultural systems that can withstand environmental shocks while maximizing economic returns, even in high-risk zones.
- Field
- Resource Management
- Source
- Agro Ekonomi (2023)
- Method
- Quantitative analysis using R/C ratio for feasibility and risk assessment.
- Sample
- 163 farmers
- Evidence
- Strong effect
Despite the inherent risks of volcanic activity, chili cultivation in disaster-prone areas surrounding Mount Merapi demonstrates economic viability, with higher income potential in zones closer to the disaster center. This resource management research insight is drawn from a 2023 study published in Agro Ekonomi. Using Quantitative analysis using r/c ratio for feasibility and risk assessment. with 163 farmers, researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: Prioritize the design of agricultural systems that can withstand environmental shocks while maximizing economic returns, even in high-risk zones.
Chili farming in disaster-prone zones offers moderate to high feasibility and manageable risks.
Despite the inherent risks of volcanic activity, chili cultivation in disaster-prone areas surrounding Mount Merapi demonstrates economic viability, with higher income potential in zones closer to the disaster center.
Agro Ekonomi · 2023
Key Findings
- 01Chili farming is feasible across all four disaster-prone zones, with R/C ratios ranging from 2.40 (Zone I) to 1.16 (Zone IV).
- 02Zone I, despite having the highest disaster risk, yielded the highest income and lowest production risk.
- 03Zone IV, the farthest zone, had the lowest costs, revenue, and income.
Application
Design takeaway
Prioritize the design of agricultural systems that can withstand environmental shocks while maximizing economic returns, even in high-risk zones.
How to apply
When designing agricultural solutions for regions prone to natural disasters, consider the specific economic activities and their risk profiles to ensure the proposed designs are both practical and beneficial.
Project actions
- 01Consider the environmental context of your design project and how natural forces might impact its success.
- 02Analyze the economic feasibility of your design, especially if it's intended for challenging or resource-scarce environments.
Method & Evidence
Variables
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- +Directly addresses the economic viability of agriculture in a high-risk environment.
- +Provides quantitative data on costs, income, and feasibility across different risk zones.
Limitations
The study's findings are specific to chili farming in the Mount Merapi region and may not apply universally to other crops or disaster types.
Reliability & validity
The study uses a quantitative approach with a reasonable sample size, enhancing its reliability. Validity is supported by the use of established economic analysis methods (R/C ratio).
Think critically
How might the design of agricultural infrastructure be adapted to not only withstand volcanic hazards but also to enhance the economic benefits observed in Zone I?
Design Principles
"Resilience in design accounts for environmental hazards to ensure sustained functionality and economic viability."
This research provides critical insights for designers and engineers involved in agricultural technology and disaster preparedness. Understanding the economic resilience of farming in hazardous environments can inform the development of more robust and adaptable agricultural systems, as well as risk mitigation strategies.
What This Means for Your Design
Even though it's dangerous, growing chilies near a volcano can still make money, and the closer you are to the danger, the more money you might make, with less risk to your crops.
How to use in your project
- 1.Use this study to justify the economic viability of a design solution in a challenging environment, or to inform risk assessment for a new product.
Add to My Project
Quick Cite
Paragraph starter
This research highlights the feasibility and economic benefits of chili farming in disaster-prone areas, demonstrating that even in high-risk environments, well-managed agricultural practices can yield significant income and manageable risks, offering a model for sustainable livelihoods in vulnerable regions.
Source
Agro Ekonomi
Feasibility and Risks of Chili Farming in Disaster-Prone Areas of Mount Merapi, Indonesia
journal · 2023
View sourceQuestions About This Research
- What does the research say about chili farming in disaster-prone zones offers moderate to high feasibility and manageable risks?
- Prioritize the design of agricultural systems that can withstand environmental shocks while maximizing economic returns, even in high-risk zones. Evidence: Agro Ekonomi (2023).
- Why does "Chili farming in disaster-prone zones offers moderate to high feasibility and manageable risks." matter for design?
- This research provides critical insights for designers and engineers involved in agricultural technology and disaster preparedness. Understanding the economic resilience of farming in hazardous environments can inform the development of more robust and adaptable agricultural systems, as well as risk mitigation strategies.
- How can designers apply this research?
- Prioritize the design of agricultural systems that can withstand environmental shocks while maximizing economic returns, even in high-risk zones.
- What were the main findings?
- Chili farming is feasible across all four disaster-prone zones, with R/C ratios ranging from 2.40 (Zone I) to 1.16 (Zone IV).. Zone I, despite having the highest disaster risk, yielded the highest income and lowest production risk.. Zone IV, the farthest zone, had the lowest costs, revenue, and income.
- What research method was used?
- Quantitative analysis using R/C ratio for feasibility and risk assessment. with 163 farmers.
- How strong is the evidence?
- Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2023 journal from Agro Ekonomi.
- What should I do differently in my next project?
- When designing agricultural solutions for regions prone to natural disasters, consider the specific economic activities and their risk profiles to ensure the proposed designs are both practical and beneficial.
- What are the limitations?
- The study focuses on chili farming and may not be generalizable to all agricultural practices. The risk assessment primarily considers production and income risks, not the direct impact of disaster events on infrastructure or farmer safety.