Short answer
Focus innovation efforts on intrinsic R&D and strategic market positioning rather than solely relying on business method patents for competitive advantage in financial services.
- Field
- Innovation & Markets
- Source
- Contemporary Economic Policy (2010)
- Method
- Econometric analysis using new indicators of R&D intensity derived from occupational data, supplemented by a review of legal decisions and legislative proposals.
- Evidence
- Mixed findings
Despite a significant number of business method patents being granted annually, they have not demonstrably increased research and development intensity within the U.S. financial services sector. This innovation & markets research insight is drawn from a 2010 study published in Contemporary Economic Policy. Using Econometric analysis using new indicators of r&d intensity derived from occupational data, supplemented by a review of legal decisions and legislative proposals., researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: Focus innovation efforts on intrinsic R&D and strategic market positioning rather than solely relying on business method patents for competitive advantage in financial services.
Business Method Patents Show Limited Impact on Financial Services Innovation
Despite a significant number of business method patents being granted annually, they have not demonstrably increased research and development intensity within the U.S. financial services sector.
Contemporary Economic Policy · 2010
Key Findings
- 01The financial sector's R&D intensity, when measured by occupational composition, is higher than official statistics suggest but lower than the broader private economy.
- 02There is no clear trend in R&D intensity across financial industries, and business method patents do not show an obvious positive effect on this intensity.
- 03Factors like heavy IT reliance, standard-setting importance, and network effects suggest potential future impacts of the patent system on financial services, similar to the electronics sector.
Application
Design takeaway
Focus innovation efforts on intrinsic R&D and strategic market positioning rather than solely relying on business method patents for competitive advantage in financial services.
How to apply
When developing new financial products or services, consider how intellectual property protection aligns with broader R&D investment and market strategy, and stay informed about legal precedents.
Project actions
- 01When researching innovation in a sector, look beyond official statistics for alternative measures.
- 02Consider how legal and regulatory changes can impact the effectiveness of innovation strategies.
Method & Evidence
Variables
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- +Development of new indicators for R&D intensity.
- +Consideration of legal and market dynamics beyond simple patent counts.
Limitations
The study relies on indirect measures of R&D intensity and does not directly measure the impact of specific patents on specific innovations.
Reliability & validity
Reliability is supported by the use of established economic indicators and a review of legal precedents. Validity is enhanced by the novel R&D intensity measures, though their direct correlation with patent impact remains a subject for further investigation.
Think critically
If business method patents aren't driving innovation in finance, what other factors are more critical, and how can designers leverage those factors?
Design Principles
"Innovation is driven by a confluence of technological adoption, market structure, and strategic intellectual property management, not solely by patent acquisition."
This insight challenges the assumption that patenting automatically drives innovation. For designers and strategists in financial services, it suggests that focusing solely on patent acquisition may not be the most effective route to fostering genuine R&D and competitive advantage. Understanding the nuances of intellectual property and its actual impact is crucial for strategic decision-making.
What This Means for Your Design
Getting a patent for a business idea in finance hasn't really made the industry more innovative yet, even though lots of these patents are being given out. But, because finance uses so much technology, patents might become more important later.
How to use in your project
- 1.Use this research to justify why focusing on user needs and functional innovation might be more impactful than solely pursuing patentable ideas in certain sectors.
- 2.Reference the findings when discussing the limitations or potential future impacts of intellectual property in your design process.
Add to My Project
Quick Cite
Paragraph starter
Research indicates that while business method patents are prevalent in the financial services sector, their direct impact on increasing R&D intensity has been limited. This suggests that design projects should prioritize user-centered innovation and functional improvements over a sole focus on patent acquisition, especially given the sector's heavy reliance on technology and evolving legal landscape.
Source
Contemporary Economic Policy
BUSINESS METHOD PATENTS AND U.S. FINANCIAL SERVICES
journal · 2010
View sourceQuestions About This Research
- What does the research say about business method patents show limited impact on financial services innovation?
- Focus innovation efforts on intrinsic R&D and strategic market positioning rather than solely relying on business method patents for competitive advantage in financial services. Evidence: Contemporary Economic Policy (2010).
- Why does "Business Method Patents Show Limited Impact on Financial Services Innovation" matter for design?
- This insight challenges the assumption that patenting automatically drives innovation. For designers and strategists in financial services, it suggests that focusing solely on patent acquisition may not be the most effective route to fostering genuine R&D and competitive advantage. Understanding the nuances of intellectual property and its actual impact is crucial for strategic decision-making.
- How can designers apply this research?
- Focus innovation efforts on intrinsic R&D and strategic market positioning rather than solely relying on business method patents for competitive advantage in financial services.
- What were the main findings?
- The financial sector's R&D intensity, when measured by occupational composition, is higher than official statistics suggest but lower than the broader private economy.. There is no clear trend in R&D intensity across financial industries, and business method patents do not show an obvious positive effect on this intensity.. Factors like heavy IT reliance, standard-setting importance, and network effects suggest potential future impacts of the patent system on financial services, similar to the electronics sector.
- What research method was used?
- Econometric analysis using new indicators of R&D intensity derived from occupational data, supplemented by a review of legal decisions and legislative proposals..
- How strong is the evidence?
- Evidence strength is rated Mixed findings, based on a 2010 journal from Contemporary Economic Policy.
- What should I do differently in my next project?
- When developing new financial products or services, consider how intellectual property protection aligns with broader R&D investment and market strategy, and stay informed about legal precedents.
- What are the limitations?
- The study's R&D intensity indicators are based on occupational composition, which may not perfectly capture all forms of R&D investment. The analysis is primarily correlational, making definitive causal links challenging.