Study
User-Centred DesignHigh ImpactStrong effect

Interactive Digital Interfaces Designed by Students Achieve High Usability Ratings

Student-developed interactive digital interfaces, created using Figma within a structured course, were predominantly evaluated as highly usable by both students and instructors.

Journal of Computer and Education Research · 2022

01

Key Findings

  • 01The majority of student-designed mobile application and website interfaces were assessed as 'good usable'.
  • 02A significant portion of the interfaces were rated as 'excellent usable'.
02

Application

Design takeaway

Emphasize hands-on experience with industry-standard tools like Figma and incorporate structured evaluation methods within design education to ensure the development of usable interfaces.

How to apply

Incorporate user-centered design principles and usability testing methodologies into design education programs, utilizing accessible tools like Figma.

Project actions

  • 01Clearly define the usability criteria you will use to evaluate your design.
  • 02Document your design process, including any challenges and how you addressed them.
03

Method & Evidence

AimTo evaluate the usability of interactive digital interfaces developed by students in a 'Digital Interface Design' course and to understand their experiences during the development process.
MethodCase Study
ProcedureStudents participated in an eight-week 'Digital Interface Design' course, developing interactive mobile application or website interfaces using Figma. Following the development period, both student-created works and their overall experiences were evaluated by students and the lecturer using qualitative (content analysis) and quantitative (descriptive analysis) methods.
Sample57 participants
ContextHigher education digital interface design course

Variables

IVDesign process and tool usage (Figma)
DVUsability ratings of developed interfaces
CVCourse structure, duration of implementation (8 weeks)
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Direct evaluation of student work within an academic context.
  • +Use of both qualitative and quantitative data for a comprehensive analysis.

Limitations

The usability of designs created by students might differ from those created by experienced professionals. The specific software used can also influence outcomes.

Reliability & validity

The study's validity is supported by the use of multiple evaluation methods (qualitative and quantitative) and instructor/student perspectives. Reliability could be enhanced by using standardized usability testing protocols and a larger, more diverse sample.

Think critically

How might the usability of student-designed interfaces differ from those created by experienced professionals, and what factors contribute to this difference?

05

Design Principles

"Usability can be effectively cultivated through structured design education and practical application."

This research highlights that educational environments can effectively foster the development of usable digital interfaces. It suggests that pedagogical approaches focusing on interactive design processes, even with student designers, can yield products that meet user expectations for functionality and ease of use.

06

What This Means for Your Design

Students who learned to design digital interfaces using tools like Figma in a class project created interfaces that most people found easy to use.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Reference this study when discussing the importance of usability in your own design project and how educational settings can foster it.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

(2022). Students' Experiences and Usability Evaluation in Interactive Digital Interface Development Process. Journal of Computer and Education Research. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1109158 Retrieved from https://designdex.org/study/2d968d5a-5859-4042-9fda-d67e9a14de35/interactive-digital-interfaces-designed-by-students-achieve-high-usability-ratings

Paragraph starter

Research indicates that interactive digital interfaces developed within structured educational settings, such as the 'Digital Interface Design' course studied by Tepe (2022), can achieve high levels of usability. This suggests that focusing on practical application with tools like Figma and incorporating evaluation methods can lead to student-designed products that are both functional and user-friendly, a key consideration for any design project aiming for user adoption.

09

Source

Journal of Computer and Education Research

Students' Experiences and Usability Evaluation in Interactive Digital Interface Development Process

journal · 2022

View source

Questions about this research

What does the research say about interactive digital interfaces designed by students achieve high usability ratings?
Emphasize hands-on experience with industry-standard tools like Figma and incorporate structured evaluation methods within design education to ensure the development of usable interfaces. Evidence: Journal of Computer and Education Research (2022).
Why does "Interactive Digital Interfaces Designed by Students Achieve High Usability Ratings" matter for design?
This research highlights that educational environments can effectively foster the development of usable digital interfaces. It suggests that pedagogical approaches focusing on interactive design processes, even with student designers, can yield products that meet user expectations for functionality and ease of use.
How can designers apply this research?
Emphasize hands-on experience with industry-standard tools like Figma and incorporate structured evaluation methods within design education to ensure the development of usable interfaces.
What were the main findings?
The majority of student-designed mobile application and website interfaces were assessed as 'good usable'.. A significant portion of the interfaces were rated as 'excellent usable'.
What research method was used?
Case Study with 57 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2022 journal from Journal of Computer and Education Research.
What should I do differently in my next project?
Incorporate user-centered design principles and usability testing methodologies into design education programs, utilizing accessible tools like Figma.
What are the limitations?
The study focused on student designers and a specific tool (Figma), which may limit generalizability to professional design contexts or other tools. The 'convenient sampling' method might introduce bias.
Is there evidence that interactive digital affects design outcomes?
Student projects in interactive digital interface design were found to be highly usable, with most receiving 'good' or 'excellent' ratings. This research highlights that educational environments can effectively foster the development of usable digital interfaces. It suggests that pedagogical approaches focusing on inte Source: Journal of Computer and Education Research (2022).
Where does this digital interfaces research apply?
Higher education digital interface design course It sits within user-centred design research on designdex.org.

Related research topics

interactive digital design research · evidence on interactive digital · does interactive digital improve design outcomes · digital interfaces studies for designers · interactive digital and digital interfaces findings · user-centred design research evidence