Integrate Survivability into System Development for Enhanced Resilience
Survivability must be a core consideration throughout the entire system development lifecycle, not an afterthought, to effectively mitigate risks in networked systems.
Academic Publication · 2002
Key Findings
- 01Current life-cycle models treat survivability as an add-on, leading to inadequate risk mitigation.
- 02Survivability goals and methods need to be addressed at every phase of the development lifecycle.
- 03A dedicated survivability-focused life-cycle model can improve system resilience.
Application
Design takeaway
Incorporate survivability planning and execution into every stage of the design and development process, from initial concept to ongoing maintenance.
How to apply
When designing any networked system, map out how survivability will be addressed in requirements gathering, design, implementation, testing, and deployment phases.
Project actions
- 01Consider potential failure points and recovery strategies for your design.
- 02Research security best practices relevant to your product's context.
Method & Evidence
Variables
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- +Provides a foundational conceptual model for survivability integration.
- +Emphasizes a proactive, lifecycle-wide approach to system resilience.
Limitations
It can be challenging to fully simulate all possible failure scenarios in a typical design project.
Reliability & validity
The conceptual nature of the model limits direct assessment of reliability and validity without empirical testing. The validity would depend on how well the proposed lifecycle addresses real-world survivability challenges.
Think critically
To what extent can 'survivability' be quantified and measured as a design attribute?
Design Principles
"Survivability by Design: Integrate resilience and security considerations from the earliest stages of product development."
Modern interconnected systems face significant security threats. By embedding survivability principles from the outset, design teams can build more robust and resilient products that can withstand and recover from compromises, ensuring continued operation and user trust.
What This Means for Your Design
To make sure your product can survive attacks or failures, you need to think about safety and recovery from the very beginning, not just add it on later.
How to use in your project
- 1.Reference this research when discussing the importance of integrating security and resilience into your design process.
- 2.Use the concept of a 'survivability lifecycle' to justify your design decisions related to robustness and failure management.
Add to My Project
Quick Cite
(2002). Life-Cycle Models for Survivable Systems. Academic Publication. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada407793 Retrieved from https://designdex.org/study/390a7d76-7c17-49c3-9497-45b593a8c4ee/integrate-survivability-into-system-development-for-enhanced-resilience
Paragraph starter
The integration of survivability throughout the system development lifecycle is paramount for creating resilient networked systems. As highlighted by Linger et al. (2002), treating survivability as an add-on feature rather than a core requirement leads to significant vulnerabilities. Therefore, design decisions must proactively address potential threats and failure modes from the initial concept phase through to deployment and ongoing maintenance, ensuring the system can withstand and recover from compromises.
Source
Questions about this research
- What does the research say about integrate survivability into system development for enhanced resilience?
- Incorporate survivability planning and execution into every stage of the design and development process, from initial concept to ongoing maintenance. Evidence: Academic Publication (2002).
- Why does "Integrate Survivability into System Development for Enhanced Resilience" matter for design?
- Modern interconnected systems face significant security threats. By embedding survivability principles from the outset, design teams can build more robust and resilient products that can withstand and recover from compromises, ensuring continued operation and user trust.
- How can designers apply this research?
- Incorporate survivability planning and execution into every stage of the design and development process, from initial concept to ongoing maintenance.
- What were the main findings?
- Current life-cycle models treat survivability as an add-on, leading to inadequate risk mitigation.. Survivability goals and methods need to be addressed at every phase of the development lifecycle.. A dedicated survivability-focused life-cycle model can improve system resilience.
- What research method was used?
- Conceptual Framework Development.
- How strong is the evidence?
- Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2002 journal from Academic Publication.
- What should I do differently in my next project?
- When designing any networked system, map out how survivability will be addressed in requirements gathering, design, implementation, testing, and deployment phases.
- What are the limitations?
- The proposed model is conceptual and requires empirical validation across diverse system types.
- Is there evidence that survivability affects design outcomes?
- Existing development processes often neglect survivability until late in the project, making it difficult and costly to implement effectively. A new approach is needed where survivability is a fundamental requirement from conception through deployment and maintenance. Modern interconnected systems face significant secu Source: Academic Publication (2002).
- Where does this development research apply?
- Information Technology and Systems Engineering It sits within commercial production research on designdex.org.
Related research topics
survivability design research · evidence on survivability · does survivability improve design outcomes · development studies for designers · survivability and development findings · commercial production research evidence