Study
Classic DesignHigh ImpactModerate effect

Art Expertise Moderates Aesthetic Judgments, Not Core Emotional Responses

While art experts may offer more nuanced aesthetic evaluations, the fundamental emotional impact of art appears to be relatively consistent across individuals, regardless of their training.

PLoS ONE · 2015

01

Key Findings

  • 01Art experts rated artworks higher on aesthetic facets (beauty, desire) than novices.
  • 02No significant group differences were found in affective evaluations (valence, arousal).
  • 03Brief art training had a small positive effect on preference ratings for novices.
02

Application

Design takeaway

Focus on creating designs that elicit strong, fundamental emotional responses, as these are less dependent on user expertise, while also considering how to provide context or education to deepen appreciation for more complex aesthetic qualities.

How to apply

When designing, prioritize the core emotional experience. For products or experiences with complex aesthetic features, consider providing accessible information or tutorials to enhance user understanding and appreciation.

Project actions

  • 01When evaluating user responses to your design, differentiate between emotional reactions and reasoned aesthetic judgments.
  • 02Consider if your design's appeal relies heavily on specialized knowledge or if its core appeal is more universal.
03

Method & Evidence

AimTo investigate how art expertise and training influence emotional and preference judgments of representational and abstract artworks.
MethodExperimental study with comparative groups
ProcedureParticipants, including art novices and experts, rated a collection of abstract artworks and portraits in both laboratory and museum settings. A subset of novices received brief art historical training before a second rating session.
Sample60 participants (40 novices, 20 experts)
ContextArt appreciation and perception

Variables

IV["Art expertise (expert vs. novice)","Training (trained vs. untrained novices)"]
DV["Aesthetic judgments (beauty, wanting)","Affective evaluations (valence, arousal)","Preference ratings"]
CV["Artworks presented (abstract vs. representational)","Setting (laboratory vs. museum)","Number of sessions"]
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Inclusion of both novice and expert groups provides a clear comparison.
  • +Testing in both lab and museum settings adds ecological validity.

Limitations

The specific type of art and the brevity of the training might not reflect all design contexts. The definition of 'expertise' can also be subjective.

Reliability & validity

The study's reliability could be supported by the use of standardized rating scales and multiple artworks. Validity is enhanced by comparing different settings and including both novices and experts.

Think critically

To what extent do the findings on art appreciation translate to the appreciation of functional designs, where utility might be a more dominant factor than pure aesthetics?

05

Design Principles

"Emotional impact is a primary driver of engagement, with aesthetic refinement being a secondary, expertise-dependent layer."

Understanding how expertise influences perception is crucial for designers aiming to evoke specific emotional responses or create universally appreciated aesthetics. It suggests that while technical knowledge can refine appreciation, the core affective experience of a design might be more broadly accessible.

06

What This Means for Your Design

People who know a lot about art might say they like it more in certain ways, but everyone feels pretty much the same basic emotions when looking at it. A little bit of learning about art can make people like it a bit more.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Use this study to justify why you are measuring both emotional responses (e.g., using a Likert scale for 'excitement') and aesthetic preferences (e.g., asking users to rate 'beauty' or 'desirability') in your user testing.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

(2015). The Influence of Art Expertise and Training on Emotion and Preference Ratings for Representational and Abstract Artworks. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134241 Retrieved from https://designdex.org/study/3ae53f32-706b-4ef7-88ce-5a1cdffcda2e/art-expertise-moderates-aesthetic-judgments-not-core-emotional-responses

Paragraph starter

This study by van Paasschen et al. (2015) suggests that while art experts may exhibit higher ratings for aesthetic qualities like beauty, the fundamental emotional responses (valence and arousal) to artworks are largely consistent across expertise levels. This implies that for design projects, focusing on universally resonant emotional impacts is key, while acknowledging that specialized knowledge can refine aesthetic appreciation.

09

Source

PLoS ONE

The Influence of Art Expertise and Training on Emotion and Preference Ratings for Representational and Abstract Artworks

journal · 2015

View source

Questions about this research

What does the research say about art expertise moderates aesthetic judgments, not core emotional responses?
Focus on creating designs that elicit strong, fundamental emotional responses, as these are less dependent on user expertise, while also considering how to provide context or education to deepen appreciation for more complex aesthetic qualities. Evidence: PLoS ONE (2015).
Why does "Art Expertise Moderates Aesthetic Judgments, Not Core Emotional Responses" matter for design?
Understanding how expertise influences perception is crucial for designers aiming to evoke specific emotional responses or create universally appreciated aesthetics. It suggests that while technical knowledge can refine appreciation, the core affective experience of a design might be more broadly accessible.
How can designers apply this research?
Focus on creating designs that elicit strong, fundamental emotional responses, as these are less dependent on user expertise, while also considering how to provide context or education to deepen appreciation for more complex aesthetic qualities.
What were the main findings?
Art experts rated artworks higher on aesthetic facets (beauty, desire) than novices.. No significant group differences were found in affective evaluations (valence, arousal).. Brief art training had a small positive effect on preference ratings for novices.
What research method was used?
Experimental study with comparative groups with 60 participants (40 novices, 20 experts).
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Moderate effect, based on a 2015 journal from PLoS ONE.
What should I do differently in my next project?
When designing, prioritize the core emotional experience. For products or experiences with complex aesthetic features, consider providing accessible information or tutorials to enhance user understanding and appreciation.
What are the limitations?
The study focused on visual art, and the 'training' was brief and specific to art history. Generalizability to other design disciplines or more extensive training may vary.
Is there evidence that emotional responses affects design outcomes?
Experts appreciate art more in terms of beauty and desirability, but both experts and novices experience similar core emotions (valence and arousal) when viewing art. Basic training can slightly improve novice preference. Understanding how expertise influences perception is crucial for designers aiming to evoke specifi Source: PLoS ONE (2015).
Where does this art expertise research apply?
Art appreciation and perception It sits within classic design research on designdex.org.

Related research topics

emotional responses design research · evidence on emotional responses · does emotional responses improve design outcomes · art expertise studies for designers · emotional responses and art expertise findings · classic design research evidence