Short answer
Integrate a framework that explicitly acknowledges and utilizes the five identified shared evidence practices (stakeholder, process, problem, effect, solution-driven) throughout the eHealth development lifecycle.
- Field
- User-Centred Design
- Source
- Proceedings of the Design Society (2023)
- Method
- Qualitative research using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis.
- Sample
- 8 participants
- Evidence
- Moderate effect
Identifying shared evidence practices between healthcare and design professionals can bridge disciplinary gaps and foster a more cohesive approach to eHealth system development. This user-centred design research insight is drawn from a 2023 study published in Proceedings of the Design Society. Using Qualitative research using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis. with 8 participants, researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: Integrate a framework that explicitly acknowledges and utilizes the five identified shared evidence practices (stakeholder, process, problem, effect, solution-driven) throughout the eHealth development lifecycle.
Aligning Healthcare and Design Evidence Practices for Enhanced eHealth Development
Identifying shared evidence practices between healthcare and design professionals can bridge disciplinary gaps and foster a more cohesive approach to eHealth system development.
Proceedings of the Design Society · 2023
Key Findings
- 01Healthcare and design professionals share five core evidence practices: stakeholder-driven, process-driven, problem-driven, effect-driven, and solution-driven.
- 02Epistemological differences exist between the fields, but shared practices offer a foundation for mutual understanding.
- 03Alignment of development and research practices is crucial for successful eHealth outcomes.
Application
Design takeaway
Integrate a framework that explicitly acknowledges and utilizes the five identified shared evidence practices (stakeholder, process, problem, effect, solution-driven) throughout the eHealth development lifecycle.
How to apply
When developing eHealth solutions, facilitate workshops where design and healthcare teams can map out their respective evidence practices, identifying overlaps and areas for synergy.
Project actions
- 01When researching a design problem, consider how different stakeholders (e.g., users, developers, clinicians) might define and use 'evidence'.
- 02Reflect on your own design process: is it driven by the problem, the solution, the user, the process, or the expected outcome? How does this align with potential end-users' perspectives?
Method & Evidence
Variables
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- +Focuses on the critical interdisciplinary aspect of eHealth development.
- +Identifies concrete shared practices that can guide collaboration.
Limitations
The findings are based on a small number of interviews, so they might not represent all healthcare and design professionals. The context is specific to eHealth, so it may not apply directly to other design fields.
Reliability & validity
The use of reflexive thematic analysis aims for rigor in qualitative data interpretation. However, the small sample size and subjective nature of interviews may impact generalizability and reliability.
Think critically
To what extent do the identified 'shared' evidence practices truly represent a deep epistemological alignment, or are they merely superficial similarities in terminology?
Design Principles
"Foster interdisciplinary collaboration by identifying and leveraging common evidence-based practices."
Effective eHealth systems require a deep understanding of both user needs (healthcare) and design principles. Recognizing commonalities in how these fields approach evidence can lead to more user-centric and impactful digital health solutions.
What This Means for Your Design
People who make healthcare technology and people who design it often think about 'evidence' in similar ways, even if they use different words. Finding these common ways of thinking can help them work together better.
How to use in your project
- 1.Use the identified shared evidence practices as a framework to analyze the needs and perspectives of different stakeholders in your design project.
- 2.Discuss how your design process aligns with or deviates from these evidence-based approaches.
Add to My Project
Quick Cite
Paragraph starter
This research highlights that professionals in healthcare and design share common evidence practices, such as being stakeholder-driven, process-driven, problem-driven, effect-driven, and solution-driven. Recognizing these shared approaches is crucial for fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and developing effective eHealth systems, suggesting that design projects should actively seek to integrate and align evidence from diverse professional perspectives.
Source
Proceedings of the Design Society
EXPLORING HEALTH AND DESIGN EVIDENCE PRACTICES IN EHEALTH SYSTEMS’ DEVELOPMENT
journal · 2023
View sourceQuestions About This Research
- What does the research say about aligning healthcare and design evidence practices for enhanced ehealth development?
- Integrate a framework that explicitly acknowledges and utilizes the five identified shared evidence practices (stakeholder, process, problem, effect, solution-driven) throughout the eHealth development lifecycle. Evidence: Proceedings of the Design Society (2023).
- Why does "Aligning Healthcare and Design Evidence Practices for Enhanced eHealth Development" matter for design?
- Effective eHealth systems require a deep understanding of both user needs (healthcare) and design principles. Recognizing commonalities in how these fields approach evidence can lead to more user-centric and impactful digital health solutions.
- How can designers apply this research?
- Integrate a framework that explicitly acknowledges and utilizes the five identified shared evidence practices (stakeholder, process, problem, effect, solution-driven) throughout the eHealth development lifecycle.
- What were the main findings?
- Healthcare and design professionals share five core evidence practices: stakeholder-driven, process-driven, problem-driven, effect-driven, and solution-driven.. Epistemological differences exist between the fields, but shared practices offer a foundation for mutual understanding.. Alignment of development and research practices is crucial for successful eHealth outcomes.
- What research method was used?
- Qualitative research using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis. with 8 participants.
- How strong is the evidence?
- Evidence strength is rated Moderate effect, based on a 2023 journal from Proceedings of the Design Society.
- What should I do differently in my next project?
- When developing eHealth solutions, facilitate workshops where design and healthcare teams can map out their respective evidence practices, identifying overlaps and areas for synergy.
- What are the limitations?
- The study involved a small sample size from specific professional backgrounds, which may limit the generalizability of findings to broader healthcare and design contexts.