Short answer

Embrace technological innovation, but proactively design for workforce adaptation and support.

Field
Innovation & Design
Source
Technological Forecasting and Social Change (2023)
Method
Systematic Literature Review
Evidence
Strong effect

Empirical evidence over four decades suggests that while technology may displace some jobs, it ultimately creates or restores more employment opportunities. This innovation & design research insight is drawn from a 2023 study published in Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Using Systematic literature review, researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: Embrace technological innovation, but proactively design for workforce adaptation and support.

Study
Innovation & DesignRecentStrong effect

Technological Advancement Creates More Jobs Than It Displaces

Empirical evidence over four decades suggests that while technology may displace some jobs, it ultimately creates or restores more employment opportunities.

Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 2023

01

Key Findings

  • 01The labor-displacing effects of technology are generally offset by compensating mechanisms that create or reinstate labor.
  • 02This pattern holds true for most technology types, indicating that widespread technology-driven unemployment is not empirically supported.
  • 03Blue-collar workers have experienced adverse effects from technological change, necessitating upskilling and reskilling strategies.
02

Application

Design takeaway

Embrace technological innovation, but proactively design for workforce adaptation and support.

How to apply

When developing new technologies, consider the potential for job creation and displacement, and plan for training programs to help workers adapt to new roles.

Project actions

  • 01When researching the impact of your design, look for evidence of job creation or displacement.
  • 02Consider how your design might affect different types of workers and what support they might need.
03

Method & Evidence

AimTo systematically review the empirical literature on the impact of technological change on employment over the past four decades.
MethodSystematic Literature Review
ProcedureThe researchers conducted a comprehensive review of empirical studies published over the last 40 years, categorizing technologies into ICT, robots, innovation, TFP-style, and others, to analyze their effects on employment.
ContextEconomics and the impact of technological change on labor markets.

Variables

IVTechnological change (categories: ICT, Robots, Innovation, TFP-style, Other)
DVEmployment levels (job creation, job displacement, net employment)
CVTime period (past four decades), economic context, policy interventions (implied)
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Systematic approach ensures comprehensive coverage of empirical literature.
  • +Categorization of technologies allows for nuanced analysis.
  • +Focus on empirical evidence provides a strong foundation for conclusions.

Limitations

The study is a literature review, so its findings depend on the quality and scope of the original empirical studies. It might not fully account for rapidly emerging technologies.

Reliability & validity

The reliability of the findings is supported by the systematic review methodology. Validity is high within the scope of empirical studies reviewed, but may be limited by the heterogeneity of methodologies in the original papers and the evolving nature of technology.

Think critically

How might the specific nature of a technology (e.g., AI vs. robotics) influence its net effect on job creation versus displacement, and are there specific design considerations that could amplify positive outcomes?

05

Design Principles

"Technological innovation should be coupled with strategies for human capital development to ensure equitable distribution of benefits."

This insight challenges common anxieties about technology-driven unemployment, providing a more nuanced perspective for strategic planning in product development and workforce management. Designers and engineers can approach innovation with greater confidence, understanding that technological progress often leads to net job growth.

06

What This Means for Your Design

New technology usually creates more jobs than it takes away, but some workers might need new skills.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Use this research to support claims about the net employment effects of technological advancements in your design project's context.
  • 2.Reference this study when discussing the socio-economic implications of your proposed design solution.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

Paragraph starter

This systematic literature review by Hötte, Somers, and Theodorakopoulos (2023) provides empirical evidence that technological advancements, across various categories like ICT and robotics, tend to create more jobs than they displace. While acknowledging adverse impacts on certain worker groups, the overarching finding suggests that anxieties about widespread technology-driven unemployment are not empirically grounded, highlighting the importance of focusing on adaptive strategies like upskilling and reskilling.

09

Source

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Technology and jobs: A systematic literature review

journal · 2023

View source

Questions About This Research

What does the research say about technological advancement creates more jobs than it displaces?
Embrace technological innovation, but proactively design for workforce adaptation and support. Evidence: Technological Forecasting and Social Change (2023).
Why does "Technological Advancement Creates More Jobs Than It Displaces" matter for design?
This insight challenges common anxieties about technology-driven unemployment, providing a more nuanced perspective for strategic planning in product development and workforce management. Designers and engineers can approach innovation with greater confidence, understanding that technological progress often leads to net job growth.
How can designers apply this research?
Embrace technological innovation, but proactively design for workforce adaptation and support.
What were the main findings?
The labor-displacing effects of technology are generally offset by compensating mechanisms that create or reinstate labor.. This pattern holds true for most technology types, indicating that widespread technology-driven unemployment is not empirically supported.. Blue-collar workers have experienced adverse effects from technological change, necessitating upskilling and reskilling strategies.
What research method was used?
Systematic Literature Review.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2023 journal from Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
What should I do differently in my next project?
When developing new technologies, consider the potential for job creation and displacement, and plan for training programs to help workers adapt to new roles.
What are the limitations?
The review focuses on empirical literature and may not capture all theoretical perspectives or future technological impacts. The adverse effects on blue-collar workers highlight a need for specific interventions.