Short answer

When developing guidelines or policies that require broad acceptance and practical application, actively involve diverse stakeholders through co-creation methods.

Field
User-Centred Design
Source
Accountability in Research (2022)
Method
Case study and qualitative analysis of co-creation processes.
Evidence
Strong effect

Employing co-creation methods in the development of research integrity guidelines ensures broader stakeholder buy-in and leads to more practical and implementable outcomes. This user-centred design research insight is drawn from a 2022 study published in Accountability in Research. Using Case study and qualitative analysis of co-creation processes., researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: When developing guidelines or policies that require broad acceptance and practical application, actively involve diverse stakeholders through co-creation methods.

Study
User-Centred DesignHigh ImpactStrong effect

Co-creation enhances research integrity guideline development by integrating diverse stakeholder perspectives.

Employing co-creation methods in the development of research integrity guidelines ensures broader stakeholder buy-in and leads to more practical and implementable outcomes.

Accountability in Research · 2022

01

Key Findings

  • 01Co-creation methods facilitate the inclusion of diverse perspectives in guideline development.
  • 02The process involves preparation, participant sensitization, workshop facilitation, and data analysis.
  • 03Co-creation can lead to more implementable guidelines when followed by revision working groups.
  • 04Stakeholder engagement is a key strength of co-creation.
02

Application

Design takeaway

When developing guidelines or policies that require broad acceptance and practical application, actively involve diverse stakeholders through co-creation methods.

How to apply

When tasked with creating a new set of user guidelines, a community standard, or an ethical framework, plan a series of workshops or collaborative sessions involving all key user groups and decision-makers.

Project actions

  • 01Clearly define the scope and objectives of your co-creation process.
  • 02Carefully select and prepare your participants to ensure diverse and informed input.
03

Method & Evidence

AimHow can co-creation methods be effectively utilized for the development of research integrity guidelines, and what are the benefits and considerations for their application?
MethodCase study and qualitative analysis of co-creation processes.
ProcedureThe study involved preparing aims and design for co-creation, sensitizing participants, organizing and facilitating workshops, analyzing data, and translating findings into guidelines. The resulting guidelines were presented as the outcome, and reflections were made on the rationale and timing for using co-creation.
ContextDevelopment of research integrity guidelines.

Variables

IVUse of co-creation methods in guideline development.
DVQuality, implementability, and stakeholder acceptance of research integrity guidelines.
CVNature of the guidelines being developed, composition of the stakeholder group.
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Provides a structured approach to co-creation for guideline development.
  • +Emphasizes the importance of stakeholder inclusion.

Limitations

The success of co-creation can be highly dependent on the facilitator's skills and the willingness of participants to engage constructively.

Reliability & validity

The study's findings on the benefits of co-creation are supported by the detailed procedural description and reflection on the 'why' and 'when', suggesting good internal validity for the described process. However, generalizability to all guideline development contexts may be limited, affecting external validity.

Think critically

To what extent can co-creation be scaled for very large or geographically dispersed stakeholder groups, and what digital tools might best support this?

05

Design Principles

"Involve diverse stakeholders through co-creation to ensure the relevance and implementability of developed guidelines."

In design practice, particularly in fields with ethical considerations like research, involving a wide range of stakeholders from the outset is crucial for creating guidelines that are not only comprehensive but also readily adopted and effective. This approach moves beyond top-down policy creation to a more collaborative and user-centric model.

06

What This Means for Your Design

When making rules or guidelines for a group, it's best to ask everyone involved what they think and work together to create them, rather than just having one person decide.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Reference this study when explaining the rationale for using participatory design methods or stakeholder workshops in your design project.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

Paragraph starter

The development of effective design guidelines necessitates the integration of diverse perspectives, as highlighted by research employing co-creation methods. By actively involving stakeholders in the guideline creation process, designers can foster greater buy-in and ensure that the resulting guidelines are practical and implementable, moving beyond a top-down approach to policy development.

09

Source

Accountability in Research

Using co-creation methods for research integrity guideline development – how, what, why and when?

journal · 2022

View source

Questions About This Research

What does the research say about co-creation enhances research integrity guideline development by integrating diverse stakeholder perspectives?
When developing guidelines or policies that require broad acceptance and practical application, actively involve diverse stakeholders through co-creation methods. Evidence: Accountability in Research (2022).
Why does "Co-creation enhances research integrity guideline development by integrating diverse stakeholder perspectives." matter for design?
In design practice, particularly in fields with ethical considerations like research, involving a wide range of stakeholders from the outset is crucial for creating guidelines that are not only comprehensive but also readily adopted and effective. This approach moves beyond top-down policy creation to a more collaborative and user-centric model.
How can designers apply this research?
When developing guidelines or policies that require broad acceptance and practical application, actively involve diverse stakeholders through co-creation methods.
What were the main findings?
Co-creation methods facilitate the inclusion of diverse perspectives in guideline development.. The process involves preparation, participant sensitization, workshop facilitation, and data analysis.. Co-creation can lead to more implementable guidelines when followed by revision working groups.. Stakeholder engagement is a key strength of co-creation.
What research method was used?
Case study and qualitative analysis of co-creation processes..
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2022 journal from Accountability in Research.
What should I do differently in my next project?
When tasked with creating a new set of user guidelines, a community standard, or an ethical framework, plan a series of workshops or collaborative sessions involving all key user groups and decision-makers.
What are the limitations?
The study's findings are based on a specific experience with research integrity guidelines and may require adaptation for other domains. The effectiveness of co-creation can depend on the specific facilitation and participant engagement.