Short answer

Designers and researchers involved in site investigation must precisely define excavation parameters, such as depth, to ensure comprehensive data retrieval.

Field
Human Factors
Source
Index of Texas Archaeology Open Access Grey Literature from the Lone Star State (2011)
Method
Archaeological excavation and data analysis
Sample
50.5 m³ (144 m²)
Evidence
Strong effect

The depth of excavation in archaeological digs directly influences the quantity and quality of cultural data that can be recovered. This human factors research insight is drawn from a 2011 study published in Index of Texas Archaeology Open Access Grey Literature from the Lone Star State. Using Archaeological excavation and data analysis with 50.5 m³ (144 m²), researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: Designers and researchers involved in site investigation must precisely define excavation parameters, such as depth, to ensure comprehensive data retrieval.

Study
Human FactorsHigh ImpactStrong effect

Excavation depth significantly impacts archaeological data recovery efficiency

The depth of excavation in archaeological digs directly influences the quantity and quality of cultural data that can be recovered.

Index of Texas Archaeology Open Access Grey Literature from the Lone Star State · 2011

01

Key Findings

  • 01Mechanical removal of 30-60 cm of sediment was necessary to access the target cultural horizon.
  • 02Excavations focused on areas with previously documented high concentrations of cultural activities.
02

Application

Design takeaway

Designers and researchers involved in site investigation must precisely define excavation parameters, such as depth, to ensure comprehensive data retrieval.

How to apply

When planning any form of site investigation or data retrieval, conduct preliminary research or surveys to estimate the depth of the target material or feature, and adjust excavation plans accordingly.

Project actions

  • 01When designing an experiment that involves uncovering something, consider how the depth of your intervention might affect what you find.
  • 02If your project involves retrieving information from a specific layer or level, clearly define how you will access it and why that depth is important.
03

Method & Evidence

AimTo determine the relationship between excavation depth and the success of data recovery for Late Archaic components.
MethodArchaeological excavation and data analysis
ProcedureExcavations were conducted in targeted zones identified as having high concentrations of cultural activities. Sediment was mechanically removed to a depth of 30-60 cm to access buried cultural materials in an A horizon, with specific block excavations (North and South) performed to recover artifacts and features.
Sample50.5 m³ (144 m²)
ContextArchaeological data recovery for a proposed bridge replacement project in Young County, Texas.

Variables

IVExcavation depth
DVQuantity and quality of recovered cultural data
CVSite stratigraphy, soil type, cultural material density
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Focused on a specific archaeological context.
  • +Employed systematic excavation techniques.

Limitations

The specific soil type and site conditions in this study might differ from your own project, affecting how depth influences data recovery.

Reliability & validity

The study's reliability is supported by systematic excavation, but validity might be influenced by the specific site conditions and the interpretation of 'cultural data'.

Think critically

How might the *method* of excavation (e.g., mechanical vs. manual) interact with the *depth* to influence the *type* of data recovered?

05

Design Principles

"Depth-informed data retrieval: The effectiveness of data recovery is maximized when excavation depth is precisely calibrated to the location of relevant cultural strata."

Understanding how excavation depth affects data recovery is crucial for optimizing research methodologies in cultural resource management and historical investigations. It informs decisions about resource allocation, time management, and the potential for bias in findings based on accessibility of different strata.

06

What This Means for Your Design

Digging deeper in the right places helps you find more important old stuff.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Reference this study when discussing how the depth of your testing or data collection method influenced the quality or quantity of your findings.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

Paragraph starter

The effectiveness of data recovery in archaeological investigations is significantly influenced by excavation depth, as demonstrated by studies where specific depths (e.g., 30-60 cm) were required to access critical cultural strata. This highlights the importance of precisely calibrating excavation parameters to the expected stratigraphy of a site to ensure comprehensive data retrieval and avoid biased findings.

09

Source

Index of Texas Archaeology Open Access Grey Literature from the Lone Star State

Root-Be-Gone (41YN452): Data Recovery of Late Archaic Components in Young County, Texas Vol I

journal · 2011

View source

Questions About This Research

What does the research say about excavation depth significantly impacts archaeological data recovery efficiency?
Designers and researchers involved in site investigation must precisely define excavation parameters, such as depth, to ensure comprehensive data retrieval. Evidence: Index of Texas Archaeology Open Access Grey Literature from the Lone Star State (2011).
Why does "Excavation depth significantly impacts archaeological data recovery efficiency" matter for design?
Understanding how excavation depth affects data recovery is crucial for optimizing research methodologies in cultural resource management and historical investigations. It informs decisions about resource allocation, time management, and the potential for bias in findings based on accessibility of different strata.
How can designers apply this research?
Designers and researchers involved in site investigation must precisely define excavation parameters, such as depth, to ensure comprehensive data retrieval.
What were the main findings?
Mechanical removal of 30-60 cm of sediment was necessary to access the target cultural horizon.. Excavations focused on areas with previously documented high concentrations of cultural activities.
What research method was used?
Archaeological excavation and data analysis with 50.5 m³ (144 m²).
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2011 journal from Index of Texas Archaeology Open Access Grey Literature from the Lone Star State.
What should I do differently in my next project?
When planning any form of site investigation or data retrieval, conduct preliminary research or surveys to estimate the depth of the target material or feature, and adjust excavation plans accordingly.
What are the limitations?
The study focused on a specific site and time period, and findings may not be universally applicable to all archaeological contexts.