Short answer

Integrate sustainability into the design and operation of research facilities to minimize their environmental impact and align with global climate goals.

Field
Resource Management
Source
FEBS Letters (2020)
Method
Literature review and synthesis
Evidence
Strong effect

The global scientific research sector, encompassing millions of laboratories, consumes substantial energy and resources, contributing significantly to climate change. This resource management research insight is drawn from a 2020 study published in FEBS Letters. Using Literature review and synthesis, researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: Integrate sustainability into the design and operation of research facilities to minimize their environmental impact and align with global climate goals.

Study
Resource ManagementHigh ImpactStrong effect

Laboratory Operations Contribute Significantly to Global Carbon Emissions

The global scientific research sector, encompassing millions of laboratories, consumes substantial energy and resources, contributing significantly to climate change.

FEBS Letters · 2020

01

Key Findings

  • 01Laboratories typically use 5-10 times more energy per square meter than office buildings.
  • 02The global pharmaceutical industry had a carbon emission intensity 55% higher than the automotive industry in 2015.
  • 03Healthcare (including laboratories) accounted for 4.4% of total global emissions in 2019, equivalent to 2 gigatons of CO2.
02

Application

Design takeaway

Integrate sustainability into the design and operation of research facilities to minimize their environmental impact and align with global climate goals.

How to apply

When designing or retrofitting laboratory spaces, consider lifecycle assessments of materials, energy-efficient HVAC systems, and waste reduction strategies. Advocate for institutional policies that support sustainable laboratory practices.

Project actions

  • 01When researching a product or system, consider its energy consumption and waste generation.
  • 02Investigate how different materials and manufacturing processes impact the environment.
  • 03Explore ways to design for longevity and repairability to reduce the need for replacement.
03

Method & Evidence

AimWhat are the environmental impacts of global scientific research operations, and what strategies can scientists and policymakers implement to reduce these impacts?
MethodLiterature review and synthesis
ProcedureThe authors reviewed existing literature to quantify the environmental footprint of scientific research, particularly focusing on energy consumption and carbon emissions, and proposed actionable strategies for scientists and policymakers.
ContextScientific research laboratories (academic, clinical, pharmaceutical development)

Variables

IVLaboratory operational practices, energy consumption, resource use
DVEnvironmental impact, carbon emissions, climate change contribution
CVType of research conducted, size of laboratory, geographical location
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Highlights a critical but often overlooked area of environmental impact.
  • +Provides actionable recommendations for both scientists and policymakers.

Limitations

It can be challenging to accurately quantify the exact environmental impact of a specific laboratory or research activity without detailed data.

Reliability & validity

The findings are based on a synthesis of existing research, so reliability and validity depend on the quality of the original studies. The broad scope may limit the specificity of conclusions.

Think critically

To what extent can the pursuit of scientific advancement be decoupled from significant environmental costs, and what are the ethical responsibilities of researchers and designers in this context?

05

Design Principles

"Minimize the environmental footprint of research infrastructure and operations through efficient resource management and sustainable practices."

Understanding the environmental footprint of research activities is crucial for developing sustainable practices. By optimizing resource use and operational efficiency, the scientific community can mitigate its impact on climate change and potentially free up research funding.

06

What This Means for Your Design

Science labs use a lot of energy and create pollution, which makes climate change worse. Scientists and people who make rules need to find ways to make labs more eco-friendly.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Use this research to justify the importance of minimizing environmental impact in your design project.
  • 2.Refer to the statistics on laboratory energy consumption to highlight the need for sustainable design solutions.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

Paragraph starter

The environmental impact of scientific research, particularly in laboratory settings, is substantial, with significant contributions to energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. This underscores the critical need for design interventions that prioritize resource efficiency and sustainability within research operations.

09

Source

FEBS Letters

Connections between laboratory research and climate change: what scientists and policy makers can do to reduce environmental impacts

journal · 2020

View source

Questions About This Research

What does the research say about laboratory operations contribute significantly to global carbon emissions?
Integrate sustainability into the design and operation of research facilities to minimize their environmental impact and align with global climate goals. Evidence: FEBS Letters (2020).
Why does "Laboratory Operations Contribute Significantly to Global Carbon Emissions" matter for design?
Understanding the environmental footprint of research activities is crucial for developing sustainable practices. By optimizing resource use and operational efficiency, the scientific community can mitigate its impact on climate change and potentially free up research funding.
How can designers apply this research?
Integrate sustainability into the design and operation of research facilities to minimize their environmental impact and align with global climate goals.
What were the main findings?
Laboratories typically use 5-10 times more energy per square meter than office buildings.. The global pharmaceutical industry had a carbon emission intensity 55% higher than the automotive industry in 2015.. Healthcare (including laboratories) accounted for 4.4% of total global emissions in 2019, equivalent to 2 gigatons of CO2.
What research method was used?
Literature review and synthesis.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2020 journal from FEBS Letters.
What should I do differently in my next project?
When designing or retrofitting laboratory spaces, consider lifecycle assessments of materials, energy-efficient HVAC systems, and waste reduction strategies. Advocate for institutional policies that support sustainable laboratory practices.
What are the limitations?
The study relies on synthesized data from various sources, and specific emission figures may vary depending on the methodology and scope of the original studies.