Study
Resource ManagementHigh ImpactStrong effect

A Structured Framework for Measuring Industrial Symbiosis Success

A comprehensive taxonomy of indicators provides a clear methodology for assessing the environmental, economic, and social benefits of industrial symbiosis strategies.

Resources Conservation and Recycling · 2020

01

Key Findings

  • 01Industrial symbiosis indicators can be categorized based on what they measure (e.g., resource flows, economic gains, social impacts), where they are applied (e.g., firm level, network level, regional level), and how they are quantified (e.g., quantitative metrics, qualitative assessments).
  • 02A structured approach to indicator selection and measurement is essential for accurately assessing the benefits and challenges of industrial symbiosis.
02

Application

Design takeaway

Adopt a structured approach to selecting and measuring indicators for industrial symbiosis, ensuring alignment with project goals and a holistic assessment of environmental, economic, and social impacts.

How to apply

When designing or evaluating an industrial symbiosis project, use the proposed taxonomy to identify and track relevant indicators across resource flows, economic performance, and social contributions.

Project actions

  • 01When researching industrial symbiosis, consider using a framework like this to organize your findings on how it's measured.
  • 02Think about how you can measure the success of your own design project using similar categories of indicators.
03

Method & Evidence

AimWhat are the key indicators for measuring industrial symbiosis, where should they be applied, and how can they be effectively quantified?
MethodLiterature Review and Taxonomy Development
ProcedureThe authors conducted a thorough review of existing literature on industrial symbiosis indicators. Based on this review, they developed a structured taxonomy to categorize these indicators according to their purpose, scope, and measurement methodology.
ContextIndustrial Ecology and Sustainable Business Practices
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Provides a clear and organized structure for a complex topic.
  • +Based on a comprehensive review of existing research.

Limitations

It can be challenging to find consistent data for all the proposed indicators, and some aspects of industrial symbiosis might be difficult to quantify precisely.

Reliability & validity

The reliability of the taxonomy lies in its systematic categorization, while its validity is supported by its foundation in a broad literature review. However, the practical application and interpretation of specific indicators can introduce variability.

Think critically

How might the 'how to measure' aspect of this taxonomy be influenced by the technological capabilities and data infrastructure available to different organizations?

05

Design Principles

"Systematic measurement and evaluation are fundamental to optimizing complex systems like industrial symbiosis."

Understanding and quantifying the impact of industrial symbiosis is crucial for its effective implementation and widespread adoption. This framework helps designers and businesses identify the most relevant metrics to track progress and demonstrate value, leading to more informed decision-making and optimized resource utilization.

06

What This Means for Your Design

This research helps us understand how to measure if industrial symbiosis is working by giving us a clear way to choose what to measure, where to measure it, and how to measure it.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Reference this taxonomy when discussing the methods used to evaluate the environmental or economic benefits of your design solution.
  • 2.Use the categories (what, where, how) to structure your own data collection and analysis for measuring sustainability.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

(2020). What, where, and how measuring industrial symbiosis: A reasoned taxonomy of relevant indicators. Resources Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104799 Retrieved from https://designdex.org/study/57062391-3771-4939-9210-a234ab0f1679/a-structured-framework-for-measuring-industrial-symbiosis-success

Paragraph starter

The research by Fraccascia and Giannoccaro (2020) offers a valuable taxonomy for measuring industrial symbiosis, categorizing indicators by 'what' to measure, 'where' to measure, and 'how' to measure. This structured approach is essential for comprehensively evaluating the environmental, economic, and social benefits of such initiatives, providing a robust framework for data collection and analysis in design projects focused on resource efficiency and circularity.

09

Source

Resources Conservation and Recycling

What, where, and how measuring industrial symbiosis: A reasoned taxonomy of relevant indicators

journal · 2020

View source

Questions about this research

What does the research say about a structured framework for measuring industrial symbiosis success?
Adopt a structured approach to selecting and measuring indicators for industrial symbiosis, ensuring alignment with project goals and a holistic assessment of environmental, economic, and social impacts. Evidence: Resources Conservation and Recycling (2020).
Why does "A Structured Framework for Measuring Industrial Symbiosis Success" matter for design?
Understanding and quantifying the impact of industrial symbiosis is crucial for its effective implementation and widespread adoption. This framework helps designers and businesses identify the most relevant metrics to track progress and demonstrate value, leading to more informed decision-making and optimized resource utilization.
How can designers apply this research?
Adopt a structured approach to selecting and measuring indicators for industrial symbiosis, ensuring alignment with project goals and a holistic assessment of environmental, economic, and social impacts.
What were the main findings?
Industrial symbiosis indicators can be categorized based on what they measure (e.g., resource flows, economic gains, social impacts), where they are applied (e.g., firm level, network level, regional level), and how they are quantified (e.g., quantitative metrics, qualitative assessments).. A structured approach to indicator selection and measurement is essential for accurately assessing the benefits and challenges of industrial symbiosis.
What research method was used?
Literature Review and Taxonomy Development.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2020 journal from Resources Conservation and Recycling.
What should I do differently in my next project?
When designing or evaluating an industrial symbiosis project, use the proposed taxonomy to identify and track relevant indicators across resource flows, economic performance, and social contributions.
What are the limitations?
The effectiveness of the taxonomy depends on the availability and quality of data for the chosen indicators. Different contexts may require adaptation of the proposed indicator categories.
Is there evidence that industrial symbiosis affects design outcomes?
The research provides a clear system for choosing and using indicators to measure the success of industrial symbiosis, covering what to measure, where to measure it, and how to measure it. Understanding and quantifying the impact of industrial symbiosis is crucial for its effective implementation and widespread adoptio Source: Resources Conservation and Recycling (2020).
Where does this measuring industrial research apply?
Industrial Ecology and Sustainable Business Practices It sits within resource management research on designdex.org.

Related research topics

industrial symbiosis design research · evidence on industrial symbiosis · does industrial symbiosis improve design outcomes · measuring industrial studies for designers · industrial symbiosis and measuring industrial findings · resource management research evidence