Short answer

When designing systems or protocols for emergency medical interventions, consider empowering advanced practice providers with the autonomy and tools to perform procedures like procedural sedation, as they demonstrate high efficacy and safety.

Field
Human Factors
Source
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (2024)
Method
Retrospective observational study
Sample
157 administrations of propofol (135 for PSA, 22 for sedation)
Evidence
Strong effect

Advanced practice providers (APPs) can effectively and safely administer procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) for conditions like musculoskeletal trauma, achieving high success rates and managing adverse events independently. This human factors research insight is drawn from a 2024 study published in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. Using Retrospective observational study with 157 administrations of propofol (135 for PSA, 22 for sedation), researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: When designing systems or protocols for emergency medical interventions, consider empowering advanced practice providers with the autonomy and tools to perform procedures like procedural sedation, as they demonstrate high efficacy and safety.

Study
Human FactorsRecentStrong effect

Advanced practice providers achieve 91% success rate in procedural sedation for musculoskeletal trauma.

Advanced practice providers (APPs) can effectively and safely administer procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) for conditions like musculoskeletal trauma, achieving high success rates and managing adverse events independently.

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · 2024

01

Key Findings

  • 01Advanced practice providers administered propofol 157 times for procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) or general sedation.
  • 02The most common indication was musculoskeletal trauma (e.g., fracture care, joint dislocation reduction).
  • 03The predetermined goal of the intervention was achieved in 91% of cases.
  • 0412 adverse events were documented, all successfully resolved by the APP, with no severe outcomes like laryngospasm, airway obstruction, anaphylaxis, unexpected hospitalization, or death.
02

Application

Design takeaway

When designing systems or protocols for emergency medical interventions, consider empowering advanced practice providers with the autonomy and tools to perform procedures like procedural sedation, as they demonstrate high efficacy and safety.

How to apply

Evaluate the potential for expanding the scope of practice for skilled healthcare professionals in your design context, ensuring adequate training and safety protocols are in place.

Project actions

  • 01Consider how different roles within a team contribute to a successful outcome.
  • 02Investigate the safety and effectiveness of procedures performed by non-traditional practitioners.
03

Method & Evidence

AimTo understand the circumstances, patient characteristics, and safety outcomes of procedural sedation and analgesia administered by advanced practice providers in an emergency medical service context.
MethodRetrospective observational study
ProcedureResearchers reviewed medical records of ambulance runs where advanced practice providers administered propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia or general sedation between January 2019 and December 2022. They analyzed patient demographics, the reasons for sedation, the success of the intervention, and any documented adverse events.
Sample157 administrations of propofol (135 for PSA, 22 for sedation)
ContextEmergency Medical Services (EMS) in the Netherlands

Variables

IVRole of the practitioner (APP)
DVSuccess rate of PSA, incidence and severity of adverse events
CVPatient condition (musculoskeletal trauma), type of sedative (propofol), prehospital setting
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Provides real-world data on APP performance in a critical care setting.
  • +Focuses on a specific, common indication for PSA (musculoskeletal trauma).

Limitations

The data comes from past records, so it might not capture every detail, and the findings are specific to the Dutch EMS system.

Reliability & validity

Reliability is moderate due to retrospective data collection; validity is moderate as it reflects real-world practice but may have confounding factors.

Think critically

To what extent can the success of APPs in this study be attributed to their specific training versus the inherent safety of the procedures and patient population studied?

05

Design Principles

"Empowerment of skilled practitioners within defined protocols leads to efficient and safe patient care."

This research highlights the potential for expanding the scope of practice for highly trained non-physician clinicians in emergency settings. It demonstrates that with appropriate training and authorization, APPs can independently manage complex procedures, improving patient care efficiency and potentially reducing reliance on physician-staffed services.

06

What This Means for Your Design

Doctors who aren't fully qualified doctors (called advanced practice providers) can give patients medicine to make them sleepy and less pained for medical procedures, and they do a really good job most of the time, especially for broken bones or dislocated joints.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Reference this study when discussing the role of different practitioners in delivering medical care or when evaluating the safety and efficacy of specific medical procedures.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

Paragraph starter

This research demonstrates that advanced practice providers (APPs) can effectively and safely administer procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) in prehospital emergency settings. In a retrospective study of 157 administrations, APPs achieved their procedural goals in 91% of cases, primarily for musculoskeletal trauma, with all documented adverse events being minor and successfully managed by the APP. This suggests that empowering trained APPs with expanded scope of practice can lead to efficient and safe patient care.

09

Source

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

Procedural sedation by advanced practice providers in the emergency medical service in the Netherlands: a retrospective study

journal · 2024

View source

Questions About This Research

What does the research say about advanced practice providers achieve 91% success rate in procedural sedation for musculoskeletal trauma?
When designing systems or protocols for emergency medical interventions, consider empowering advanced practice providers with the autonomy and tools to perform procedures like procedural sedation, as they demonstrate high efficacy and safety. Evidence: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (2024).
Why does "Advanced practice providers achieve 91% success rate in procedural sedation for musculoskeletal trauma." matter for design?
This research highlights the potential for expanding the scope of practice for highly trained non-physician clinicians in emergency settings. It demonstrates that with appropriate training and authorization, APPs can independently manage complex procedures, improving patient care efficiency and potentially reducing reliance on physician-staffed services.
How can designers apply this research?
When designing systems or protocols for emergency medical interventions, consider empowering advanced practice providers with the autonomy and tools to perform procedures like procedural sedation, as they demonstrate high efficacy and safety.
What were the main findings?
Advanced practice providers administered propofol 157 times for procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) or general sedation.. The most common indication was musculoskeletal trauma (e.g., fracture care, joint dislocation reduction).. The predetermined goal of the intervention was achieved in 91% of cases.. 12 adverse events were documented, all successfully resolved by the APP, with no severe outcomes like laryngospasm, airway obstruction, anaphylaxis, unexpected hospitalization, or death.
What research method was used?
Retrospective observational study with 157 administrations of propofol (135 for PSA, 22 for sedation).
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2024 journal from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine.
What should I do differently in my next project?
Evaluate the potential for expanding the scope of practice for skilled healthcare professionals in your design context, ensuring adequate training and safety protocols are in place.
What are the limitations?
The study is retrospective, relying on existing documentation, and conducted in a specific geographical region, which may limit generalizability.