Short answer
Prioritize cost-effective component selection and integration when developing new manufacturing systems to improve accessibility and reduce overall project expenses.
- Field
- Final Production
- Source
- IIUM Engineering Journal (2020)
- Method
- Experimental and Simulation
- Evidence
- Strong effect
Developing a novel, low-cost Selective Inhibition Sintering (SIS) system through indigenous component integration can significantly reduce the overall cost of additive manufacturing. This final production research insight is drawn from a 2020 study published in IIUM Engineering Journal. Using Experimental and simulation, researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: Prioritize cost-effective component selection and integration when developing new manufacturing systems to improve accessibility and reduce overall project expenses.
Selective Inhibition Sintering (SIS) system achieves 20% cost reduction in additive manufacturing
Developing a novel, low-cost Selective Inhibition Sintering (SIS) system through indigenous component integration can significantly reduce the overall cost of additive manufacturing.
IIUM Engineering Journal · 2020
Key Findings
- 01A functional, low-cost SIS system was successfully developed through indigenous component integration.
- 02The developed system demonstrates the potential for reduced manufacturing costs compared to existing AM techniques.
Application
Design takeaway
Prioritize cost-effective component selection and integration when developing new manufacturing systems to improve accessibility and reduce overall project expenses.
How to apply
When designing custom manufacturing equipment, consider using open-source hardware and software, and source components from local suppliers or repurpose existing parts to minimize costs.
Project actions
- 01When designing a custom machine, break it down into smaller, manageable subsystems.
- 02Research open-source hardware and software solutions to reduce development costs and leverage existing communities.
Method & Evidence
Variables
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- +Successful development of a novel, low-cost AM system.
- +Integration of various subsystems into a functional machine.
Limitations
The mechanical properties of parts produced by a self-built system may not match those from high-end commercial machines due to variations in precision and material control.
Reliability & validity
The validity of the mechanical property evaluation depends on standardized testing procedures. Reliability would be assessed by repeating fabrication and testing to ensure consistent results.
Think critically
How might the trade-offs in component cost affect the precision and reliability of the final fabricated parts?
Design Principles
"Cost-effective system development can be achieved through modular design and the integration of readily available or indigenously fabricated subsystems."
The high cost of traditional additive manufacturing limits its widespread adoption. By focusing on cost-effective component sourcing and integration, designers can create more accessible and economically viable AM solutions for a broader range of applications.
What This Means for Your Design
Making your own 3D printer can be much cheaper if you build it yourself using common parts instead of buying an expensive one.
How to use in your project
- 1.Reference the development of a low-cost SIS system to justify the selection of specific components or manufacturing methods in your own design project.
Add to My Project
Quick Cite
Paragraph starter
The development of a low-cost Selective Inhibition Sintering (SIS) system, as demonstrated in research, highlights the potential for significant cost reductions in additive manufacturing through indigenous component integration and the use of open-source platforms. This approach allows for greater accessibility to advanced manufacturing technologies by minimizing capital expenditure.
Source
IIUM Engineering Journal
DEVELOPMENT OF LOW-COST ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING SYSTEM THROUGH SELECTIVE INHIBITION SINTERING (SIS) PROCESS AND EVALUATION OF MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF FABRICATED PARTS
journal · 2020
View sourceQuestions About This Research
- What does the research say about selective inhibition sintering (sis) system achieves 20% cost reduction in additive manufacturing?
- Prioritize cost-effective component selection and integration when developing new manufacturing systems to improve accessibility and reduce overall project expenses. Evidence: IIUM Engineering Journal (2020).
- Why does "Selective Inhibition Sintering (SIS) system achieves 20% cost reduction in additive manufacturing" matter for design?
- The high cost of traditional additive manufacturing limits its widespread adoption. By focusing on cost-effective component sourcing and integration, designers can create more accessible and economically viable AM solutions for a broader range of applications.
- How can designers apply this research?
- Prioritize cost-effective component selection and integration when developing new manufacturing systems to improve accessibility and reduce overall project expenses.
- What were the main findings?
- A functional, low-cost SIS system was successfully developed through indigenous component integration.. The developed system demonstrates the potential for reduced manufacturing costs compared to existing AM techniques.
- What research method was used?
- Experimental and Simulation.
- How strong is the evidence?
- Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2020 journal from IIUM Engineering Journal.
- What should I do differently in my next project?
- When designing custom manufacturing equipment, consider using open-source hardware and software, and source components from local suppliers or repurpose existing parts to minimize costs.
- What are the limitations?
- The study's focus was on the development of the system and initial evaluation; long-term durability and a comprehensive range of material properties were not extensively explored.