Short answer

When designing collaborative systems, actively cultivate a sense of shared purpose and identity at the system level to encourage open information flow between all participating teams.

Field
Innovation & Design
Source
Academy of Management Journal (2019)
Method
Experimental simulation and vignette study
Sample
84 teams (Study 1)
Evidence
Strong effect

When teams prioritize their own identity over the overarching system's identity, they tend to share less information with teams that are system-focused, negatively impacting overall performance. This innovation & design research insight is drawn from a 2019 study published in Academy of Management Journal. Using Experimental simulation and vignette study with 84 teams (Study 1), researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: When designing collaborative systems, actively cultivate a sense of shared purpose and identity at the system level to encourage open information flow between all participating teams.

Study
Innovation & DesignHigh ImpactStrong effect

Team identity focus significantly impacts inter-team information sharing and performance.

When teams prioritize their own identity over the overarching system's identity, they tend to share less information with teams that are system-focused, negatively impacting overall performance.

Academy of Management Journal · 2019

01

Key Findings

  • 01Team-focused teams shared less information with system-focused teams compared to other team-focused teams.
  • 02System-focused teams shared information equally with all other teams.
  • 03Interteam information sharing positively predicted interteam performance.
02

Application

Design takeaway

When designing collaborative systems, actively cultivate a sense of shared purpose and identity at the system level to encourage open information flow between all participating teams.

How to apply

In a design project involving multiple specialized teams, implement regular cross-team meetings and shared goal-setting sessions that emphasize the project's overall objectives rather than individual team deliverables.

Project actions

  • 01When working in a group project, make sure everyone understands and feels connected to the overall goal, not just their part.
  • 02Encourage open communication channels between all sub-teams or individuals working on different aspects of a design.
03

Method & Evidence

AimHow do differences in team identity focus (team vs. system) affect information sharing and performance within multiteam systems?
MethodExperimental simulation and vignette study
ProcedureThree studies were conducted. Study 1 involved manipulating team identity focus in a computer strategy simulation with 84 teams. Study 2 used vignettes to test motivational assumptions. Study 3 employed a simulation based on Study 1's results to explore system composition effects.
Sample84 teams (Study 1)
ContextMultiteam systems, organizational collaboration, knowledge management

Variables

IVTeam identity focus (team-focused vs. system-focused)
DVInterteam information sharing, interteam performance
CVTask complexity, multiteam system size, simulation environment
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Experimental control allows for clear causal inferences.
  • +Multiple studies provide converging evidence for the findings.

Limitations

The artificial nature of a controlled experiment might not fully represent the nuances of real-world team interactions and motivations.

Reliability & validity

The use of a simulation and vignette study provides a controlled environment, enhancing internal validity. However, external validity might be limited due to the artificial setting. Reliability would depend on the consistency of the simulation and participant responses.

Think critically

How might the nature of the design task itself (e.g., highly interdependent vs. modular) influence the impact of identity asymmetries on information sharing?

05

Design Principles

"Foster a unified system identity to optimize inter-team communication and performance in collaborative endeavors."

In complex design projects involving multiple teams, understanding how team identity influences collaboration is crucial. This research highlights that fostering a shared system identity can lead to more effective information exchange and better project outcomes.

06

What This Means for Your Design

If teams in a big project only care about their own team's success and not the whole project, they won't share information as well with other teams, and the whole project will suffer.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Reference this study when discussing how team dynamics and communication strategies impact the success of a collaborative design project.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

Paragraph starter

Research indicates that in collaborative environments, the focus of a team's identity significantly influences information exchange and overall performance. When teams prioritize their own identity over the overarching system's identity, they tend to share less information with system-focused teams, which can hinder project success. Therefore, fostering a unified system identity is crucial for effective collaboration in design projects.

09

Source

Academy of Management Journal

Identity Asymmetries: An Experimental Investigation of Social Identity and Information Exchange in Multiteam Systems

journal · 2019

View source

Questions About This Research

What does the research say about team identity focus significantly impacts inter-team information sharing and performance?
When designing collaborative systems, actively cultivate a sense of shared purpose and identity at the system level to encourage open information flow between all participating teams. Evidence: Academy of Management Journal (2019).
Why does "Team identity focus significantly impacts inter-team information sharing and performance." matter for design?
In complex design projects involving multiple teams, understanding how team identity influences collaboration is crucial. This research highlights that fostering a shared system identity can lead to more effective information exchange and better project outcomes.
How can designers apply this research?
When designing collaborative systems, actively cultivate a sense of shared purpose and identity at the system level to encourage open information flow between all participating teams.
What were the main findings?
Team-focused teams shared less information with system-focused teams compared to other team-focused teams.. System-focused teams shared information equally with all other teams.. Interteam information sharing positively predicted interteam performance.
What research method was used?
Experimental simulation and vignette study with 84 teams (Study 1).
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2019 journal from Academy of Management Journal.
What should I do differently in my next project?
In a design project involving multiple specialized teams, implement regular cross-team meetings and shared goal-setting sessions that emphasize the project's overall objectives rather than individual team deliverables.
What are the limitations?
The findings are based on simulated environments and may not fully capture the complexities of real-world organizational dynamics. The specific nature of the task in the simulation might influence the results.