User Involvement in Exoskeleton Development Lags Behind Consensus on Importance
While experts agree on the necessity of user-centered design for lower limb exoskeletons, standardized frameworks for its implementation and evaluation are notably absent.
Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · 2020
Key Findings
- 01A high percentage of respondents involve users in the development process, particularly during initial and iterative design phases.
- 02A wide array of methods and metrics are employed for user feedback and device testing, though some may lack validated measures.
- 03Standardization is lacking in guidelines for exoskeleton safety testing.
- 04Differences exist in user involvement strategies between clinicians and engineers.
Application
Design takeaway
Design teams should actively seek to establish and adhere to standardized user-centered design processes, incorporating validated testing methods and fostering interdisciplinary communication to ensure the development of effective and safe wearable robotic exoskeletons.
How to apply
When designing complex assistive devices like exoskeletons, proactively research and adopt established user-centered design methodologies and validation protocols. Document the rationale for chosen methods and any deviations from standard practices.
Project actions
- 01When designing, clearly define how you will involve users at each stage.
- 02Justify the methods you choose for user feedback and testing, referencing established practices where possible.
Method & Evidence
Variables
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- +Addresses a critical and timely topic in assistive technology design.
- +Involves a substantial number of experts in the field.
Limitations
The survey responses might be influenced by what experts believe is the 'right' answer, rather than their actual day-to-day practices.
Reliability & validity
The reliability of the survey responses depends on the honesty and accuracy of the experts' self-assessments. Validity is supported by the large sample size and the focus on a specific domain, but the lack of standardized methods makes direct comparison of practices challenging.
Think critically
To what extent does the lack of standardized user-centered design frameworks in exoskeleton development contribute to the slow adoption or failure of these technologies in real-world applications?
Design Principles
"Standardized user-centered design frameworks are essential for the consistent development of effective and safe assistive technologies."
This gap highlights a critical challenge in the design of assistive and augmentative technologies. Without standardized approaches, the effectiveness and safety of these complex devices may be compromised, leading to suboptimal user experiences and potentially hindering widespread adoption.
What This Means for Your Design
Even though people building exoskeletons know they should ask users what they want, they don't all do it the same way, and there aren't clear rules for testing them to make sure they're safe and work well.
How to use in your project
- 1.Reference this study when discussing the importance of user involvement and the challenges of standardization in your design project.
Add to My Project
Quick Cite
(2020). Assessing the Involvement of Users During Development of Lower Limb Wearable Robotic Exoskeletons: A Survey Study. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819883500 Retrieved from https://designdex.org/study/6380d020-d5d4-49e0-aab3-46fc569fbd55/user-involvement-in-exoskeleton-development-lags-behind-consensus-on-importance
Paragraph starter
This research highlights a common challenge in the development of advanced assistive technologies: a discrepancy between the recognized importance of user-centered design and the lack of standardized frameworks for its implementation. While experts in exoskeleton development widely agree on involving users, the methods employed are diverse and not always validated, and safety testing protocols lack consistency. This suggests a need for the creation and adoption of standardized, interdisciplinary approaches to ensure the efficacy and safety of such devices.
Source
Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Assessing the Involvement of Users During Development of Lower Limb Wearable Robotic Exoskeletons: A Survey Study
journal · 2020
View sourceQuestions about this research
- What does the research say about user involvement in exoskeleton development lags behind consensus on importance?
- Design teams should actively seek to establish and adhere to standardized user-centered design processes, incorporating validated testing methods and fostering interdisciplinary communication to ensure the development of effective and safe wearable robotic exoskeletons. Evidence: Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (2020).
- Why does "User Involvement in Exoskeleton Development Lags Behind Consensus on Importance" matter for design?
- This gap highlights a critical challenge in the design of assistive and augmentative technologies. Without standardized approaches, the effectiveness and safety of these complex devices may be compromised, leading to suboptimal user experiences and potentially hindering widespread adoption.
- How can designers apply this research?
- Design teams should actively seek to establish and adhere to standardized user-centered design processes, incorporating validated testing methods and fostering interdisciplinary communication to ensure the development of effective and safe wearable robotic exoskeletons.
- What were the main findings?
- A high percentage of respondents involve users in the development process, particularly during initial and iterative design phases.. A wide array of methods and metrics are employed for user feedback and device testing, though some may lack validated measures.. Standardization is lacking in guidelines for exoskeleton safety testing.. Differences exist in user involvement strategies between clinicians and engineers.
- What research method was used?
- Survey Study with 191 participants.
- How strong is the evidence?
- Evidence strength is rated Moderate effect, based on a 2020 journal from Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
- What should I do differently in my next project?
- When designing complex assistive devices like exoskeletons, proactively research and adopt established user-centered design methodologies and validation protocols. Document the rationale for chosen methods and any deviations from standard practices.
- What are the limitations?
- The study relies on self-reported data from experts, and the variety of methods used means some may not be rigorously validated.
- Is there evidence that wearable robotic affects design outcomes?
- Experts widely acknowledge the importance of user input in exoskeleton design, actively involving users throughout development. However, the specific methods used are diverse and not always standardized or validated, and there's a lack of consistent safety testing protocols. This gap highlights a critical challenge in Source: Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (2020).
- Where does this robotic exoskeletons research apply?
- Development of lower limb wearable robotic exoskeletons for clinical or ergonomic applications. It sits within user-centred design research on designdex.org.
Related research topics
wearable robotic design research · evidence on wearable robotic · does wearable robotic improve design outcomes · robotic exoskeletons studies for designers · wearable robotic and robotic exoskeletons findings · user-centred design research evidence