Dynamic Supplier Selection Yields Over 10% Efficiency Gains
Continuously re-evaluating and switching suppliers based on forecasted business environment changes can significantly improve operational efficiency compared to maintaining a single, static supplier relationship.
Journal of Service Science and Management · 2010
Key Findings
- 01A strategy of switching suppliers based on a predefined planning horizon and business environment forecast was over 10% more efficient than a static supplier strategy.
- 02Efficiency gains were observed across multiple operative dimensions including cost per unit and supply lead-time.
- 03Some value was lost due to certain selection dimensions, indicating potential areas for refinement.
Application
Design takeaway
Design and implement supply chain strategies that incorporate flexibility and regular re-evaluation of supplier performance against evolving market conditions.
How to apply
Develop a system for periodically assessing supplier performance against key metrics (cost, lead time, quality, reputation) and establish triggers for re-evaluating the primary supplier relationship based on market forecasts.
Project actions
- 01Consider how market changes might affect the performance of your chosen materials or components.
- 02Explore tools or methods for forecasting future trends relevant to your design project.
Method & Evidence
Variables
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- +Practical application in a real-world organizational setting.
- +Quantifiable efficiency gains reported.
Limitations
The study was conducted in a specific industry and country, so results may not be universally applicable. The 'lost value' aspect needs more detailed exploration.
Reliability & validity
The study's validity is supported by its application in a large organization, but reliability might be affected by the specific forecasting methods used and the unique context of the healthcare sector.
Think critically
To what extent can the 'lost value' on certain dimensions be mitigated through contract negotiation or supplier development programs?
Design Principles
"Adaptive supply chain management is essential for sustained competitive advantage in dynamic markets."
In today's volatile markets, rigid supply chain strategies can lead to suboptimal performance. This research highlights the strategic advantage of adaptive supplier management, demonstrating that flexibility can translate into tangible cost savings and improved service levels.
What This Means for Your Design
If you keep changing your suppliers based on what's happening in the market, you can save more money and get things done faster than if you stick with the same supplier all the time.
How to use in your project
- 1.Reference this study when discussing the importance of market analysis and adaptability in your design process, particularly in the context of sourcing or material selection.
Add to My Project
Quick Cite
(2010). Off-Line and User-Oriented Approach for Supplier Selection in Dynamic Environment: A Case Study in the Healthcare Services. Journal of Service Science and Management. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2010.34046 Retrieved from https://designdex.org/study/66f70b61-8575-4b25-8775-4fa7a3ffba8b/dynamic-supplier-selection-yields-over-10-efficiency-gains
Paragraph starter
The research by Moalem et al. (2010) demonstrates that a dynamic approach to supplier selection, which adapts to changing business environments, can yield significant efficiency improvements of over 10% compared to static supplier relationships. This highlights the strategic importance of integrating market forecasting into supply chain management to optimize operational dimensions such as cost and lead time.
Source
Journal of Service Science and Management
Off-Line and User-Oriented Approach for Supplier Selection in Dynamic Environment: A Case Study in the Healthcare Services
journal · 2010
View sourceQuestions about this research
- What does the research say about dynamic supplier selection yields over 10% efficiency gains?
- Design and implement supply chain strategies that incorporate flexibility and regular re-evaluation of supplier performance against evolving market conditions. Evidence: Journal of Service Science and Management (2010).
- Why does "Dynamic Supplier Selection Yields Over 10% Efficiency Gains" matter for design?
- In today's volatile markets, rigid supply chain strategies can lead to suboptimal performance. This research highlights the strategic advantage of adaptive supplier management, demonstrating that flexibility can translate into tangible cost savings and improved service levels.
- How can designers apply this research?
- Design and implement supply chain strategies that incorporate flexibility and regular re-evaluation of supplier performance against evolving market conditions.
- What were the main findings?
- A strategy of switching suppliers based on a predefined planning horizon and business environment forecast was over 10% more efficient than a static supplier strategy.. Efficiency gains were observed across multiple operative dimensions including cost per unit and supply lead-time.. Some value was lost due to certain selection dimensions, indicating potential areas for refinement.
- What research method was used?
- Case Study with Decision Support Tool.
- How strong is the evidence?
- Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2010 journal from Journal of Service Science and Management.
- What should I do differently in my next project?
- Develop a system for periodically assessing supplier performance against key metrics (cost, lead time, quality, reputation) and establish triggers for re-evaluating the primary supplier relationship based on market forecasts.
- What are the limitations?
- The study's findings may be specific to the healthcare services sector and the particular Israeli organization studied. The exact impact of 'lost value' on certain dimensions requires further investigation.
- Is there evidence that supplier selection affects design outcomes?
- By proactively changing suppliers according to predicted market shifts, organizations can achieve significant improvements in efficiency, cost, and delivery times. In today's volatile markets, rigid supply chain strategies can lead to suboptimal performance. This research highlights the strategic advantage of adaptive Source: Journal of Service Science and Management (2010).
- Where does this supply chain research apply?
- Healthcare services supply chain management It sits within innovation & markets research on designdex.org.
Related research topics
supplier selection design research · evidence on supplier selection · does supplier selection improve design outcomes · supply chain studies for designers · supplier selection and supply chain findings · innovation & markets research evidence