Short answer
When designing tools to measure user attitudes or behaviors, actively involve a diverse group of stakeholders in the conceptualization and validation phases to ensure the tool's relevance and accuracy.
- Field
- User-Centred Design
- Source
- OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) (2018)
- Method
- Mixed Methods (Concept Mapping, Psychometric Validation)
- Sample
- 190 STEM stakeholders
- Evidence
- Strong effect
Incorporating diverse stakeholder perspectives through concept mapping leads to more robust and representative instruments for measuring attitudes and persistence in STEM fields. This user-centred design research insight is drawn from a 2018 study published in OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network). Using Mixed methods (concept mapping, psychometric validation) with 190 STEM stakeholders, researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: When designing tools to measure user attitudes or behaviors, actively involve a diverse group of stakeholders in the conceptualization and validation phases to ensure the tool's relevance and accuracy.
Stakeholder input significantly enhances the validity of STEM attitude and persistence instruments.
Incorporating diverse stakeholder perspectives through concept mapping leads to more robust and representative instruments for measuring attitudes and persistence in STEM fields.
OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · 2018
Key Findings
- 01Concept mapping effectively organized stakeholder conceptualizations of attitude and persistence towards STEM.
- 02A participatory framework involving diverse stakeholders enhanced the development of a valid instrument (APT-STEM).
Application
Design takeaway
When designing tools to measure user attitudes or behaviors, actively involve a diverse group of stakeholders in the conceptualization and validation phases to ensure the tool's relevance and accuracy.
How to apply
When developing surveys, questionnaires, or assessment tools related to user attitudes, behaviors, or experiences, initiate a concept mapping exercise with representatives from all relevant user groups and expert communities.
Project actions
- 01When developing a research instrument, clearly define the stakeholder groups relevant to your design project.
- 02Consider using visual tools like concept mapping to synthesize diverse stakeholder input.
Method & Evidence
Variables
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- +Utilized a mixed-methods approach for comprehensive data collection and analysis.
- +Involved a broad and diverse range of STEM stakeholders.
Limitations
The time and resources required for extensive stakeholder engagement can be a constraint for smaller design projects.
Reliability & validity
The study employed multiple psychometric frameworks (CTT, IRT, RMT) to establish the reliability and validity of the developed instrument, indicating a strong methodological rigor.
Think critically
To what extent can the findings regarding STEM attitudes and persistence be generalized to other fields or non-cognitive skills?
Design Principles
"Participatory instrument development, informed by diverse stakeholder conceptualizations, yields more valid and reliable measures."
Designing effective interventions or educational programs in STEM requires accurate measurement of student attitudes and persistence. By involving a wide range of stakeholders, designers can ensure that the tools used for assessment truly reflect the multifaceted nature of these constructs, leading to more targeted and impactful design solutions.
What This Means for Your Design
To make sure a survey or test about liking and sticking with science and math subjects is good, it's best to ask lots of different people involved (like students, teachers, and people working in science jobs) what they think and use their ideas to build and check the test.
How to use in your project
- 1.Reference this study when explaining the importance of stakeholder consultation in the development of research instruments for your design project.
Add to My Project
Quick Cite
Paragraph starter
The development of robust measurement instruments, such as those used to assess user attitudes or behaviors, benefits significantly from a participatory approach. As demonstrated by Sunny (2018), employing methods like concept mapping with diverse stakeholder groups can lead to a more comprehensive conceptual domain and enhanced instrument validity, ensuring that the tool accurately reflects the intended constructs.
Source
OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)
Stakeholders' Conceptualization of Students' Attitudes and Persistence towards STEM: A Mixed Methods Instrument Development and Validation Study.
journal · 2018
View sourceQuestions About This Research
- What does the research say about stakeholder input significantly enhances the validity of stem attitude and persistence instruments?
- When designing tools to measure user attitudes or behaviors, actively involve a diverse group of stakeholders in the conceptualization and validation phases to ensure the tool's relevance and accuracy. Evidence: OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) (2018).
- Why does "Stakeholder input significantly enhances the validity of STEM attitude and persistence instruments." matter for design?
- Designing effective interventions or educational programs in STEM requires accurate measurement of student attitudes and persistence. By involving a wide range of stakeholders, designers can ensure that the tools used for assessment truly reflect the multifaceted nature of these constructs, leading to more targeted and impactful design solutions.
- How can designers apply this research?
- When designing tools to measure user attitudes or behaviors, actively involve a diverse group of stakeholders in the conceptualization and validation phases to ensure the tool's relevance and accuracy.
- What were the main findings?
- Concept mapping effectively organized stakeholder conceptualizations of attitude and persistence towards STEM.. A participatory framework involving diverse stakeholders enhanced the development of a valid instrument (APT-STEM).
- What research method was used?
- Mixed Methods (Concept Mapping, Psychometric Validation) with 190 STEM stakeholders.
- How strong is the evidence?
- Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2018 journal from OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network).
- What should I do differently in my next project?
- When developing surveys, questionnaires, or assessment tools related to user attitudes, behaviors, or experiences, initiate a concept mapping exercise with representatives from all relevant user groups and expert communities.
- What are the limitations?
- The study focused on a specific set of STEM stakeholders; generalizability to other fields or stakeholder groups may vary. The concept mapping process itself can be resource-intensive.