Short answer

Shift focus from 'making things sustainable' to 'designing systems that are inherently sustainable'.

Field
Sustainability
Source
INCOSE International Symposium (2024)
Method
Conceptual analysis and theoretical framework development
Evidence
Strong effect

Reframing sustainability as an engineered outcome of a well-designed system, rather than a standalone development goal, can lead to more effective and achievable outcomes. This sustainability research insight is drawn from a 2024 study published in INCOSE International Symposium. Using Conceptual analysis and theoretical framework development, researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: Shift focus from 'making things sustainable' to 'designing systems that are inherently sustainable'.

Study
SustainabilityRecentStrong effect

Sustainability as a Systemic Byproduct, Not a Development Goal

Reframing sustainability as an engineered outcome of a well-designed system, rather than a standalone development goal, can lead to more effective and achievable outcomes.

INCOSE International Symposium · 2024

01

Key Findings

  • 01Sustainability can be viewed as an engineered byproduct of a well-structured system.
  • 02Systems Theory provides a framework for understanding and achieving sustainability.
  • 03Addressing system pathologies (violations of system propositions) can enhance sustainability.
02

Application

Design takeaway

Shift focus from 'making things sustainable' to 'designing systems that are inherently sustainable'.

How to apply

When initiating a design project, consider the entire system within which the product or service will operate, and how its design choices will influence the system's overall sustainability.

Project actions

  • 01Consider the life cycle of your design within a broader system context.
  • 02Analyze how your design choices might create or resolve 'system pathologies' related to sustainability.
03

Method & Evidence

AimHow can a systems-thinking approach, focusing on sustainability as a byproduct of system design and performance, enhance the achievement of sustainability objectives?
MethodConceptual analysis and theoretical framework development
ProcedureThe paper introduces a 'Mindshift' in approaching sustainability, proposing three challenges: viewing sustainability as a byproduct of an underlying system, analyzing it through the lens of Systems Theory, and enhancing it by identifying and resolving system pathologies.
ContextSystems engineering and sustainable development

Variables

IVSystems design approach (treating sustainability as a byproduct vs. a goal)
DVAchieved level of sustainability
CVSystem complexity, industry sector
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Provides a novel and potentially more effective framework for achieving sustainability.
  • +Encourages holistic thinking about design and its impacts.

Limitations

It can be challenging to fully map and understand all the systemic interactions relevant to sustainability for a given design.

Reliability & validity

The theoretical nature of the paper means direct reliability and validity testing is not applicable in the traditional sense. Its validity rests on the logical coherence of Systems Theory and its application to sustainability.

Think critically

To what extent can sustainability truly be an 'engineered byproduct' when human behavior and external factors are so influential?

05

Design Principles

"Design for systemic sustainability: Ensure that the fundamental structure and operation of a system inherently lead to sustainable outcomes."

This perspective shift encourages designers and engineers to embed sustainability into the fundamental design of systems and processes. By treating sustainability as a consequence of robust system design, it becomes an inherent feature rather than an add-on, leading to more integrated and impactful solutions.

06

What This Means for Your Design

Instead of trying to make a product 'green' as an extra step, think about how the whole system it's part of can be designed from the start to be naturally sustainable.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Frame your design problem not just as creating a product, but as designing a system that produces sustainable outputs.
  • 2.Use Systems Theory concepts to analyze the potential sustainability impacts of your design choices.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

Paragraph starter

This design project adopts a systems perspective, viewing sustainability not as a development goal but as an engineered byproduct of a well-designed system. By applying principles of Systems Theory, the aim is to identify and resolve system pathologies that hinder sustainable outcomes, ensuring that the design inherently contributes to a more sustainable system.

09

Source

INCOSE International Symposium

Sustainability Mindshift: Incorporating the Systems Perspective

journal · 2024

View source

Questions About This Research

What does the research say about sustainability as a systemic byproduct, not a development goal?
Shift focus from 'making things sustainable' to 'designing systems that are inherently sustainable'. Evidence: INCOSE International Symposium (2024).
Why does "Sustainability as a Systemic Byproduct, Not a Development Goal" matter for design?
This perspective shift encourages designers and engineers to embed sustainability into the fundamental design of systems and processes. By treating sustainability as a consequence of robust system design, it becomes an inherent feature rather than an add-on, leading to more integrated and impactful solutions.
How can designers apply this research?
Shift focus from 'making things sustainable' to 'designing systems that are inherently sustainable'.
What were the main findings?
Sustainability can be viewed as an engineered byproduct of a well-structured system.. Systems Theory provides a framework for understanding and achieving sustainability.. Addressing system pathologies (violations of system propositions) can enhance sustainability.
What research method was used?
Conceptual analysis and theoretical framework development.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2024 journal from INCOSE International Symposium.
What should I do differently in my next project?
When initiating a design project, consider the entire system within which the product or service will operate, and how its design choices will influence the system's overall sustainability.
What are the limitations?
The paper is theoretical and does not provide empirical data on the effectiveness of this 'Mindshift' in practice.