Short answer

Integrate a sustainability assessment framework into the design and production workflow for additive manufacturing to ensure environmental and social responsibility.

Field
Sustainability
Source
Procedia CIRP (2019)
Method
Literature Review and Framework Development
Evidence
Moderate effect

A structured checklist can help organizations evaluate and improve the sustainability performance of their additive manufacturing processes. This sustainability research insight is drawn from a 2019 study published in Procedia CIRP. Using Literature review and framework development, researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: Integrate a sustainability assessment framework into the design and production workflow for additive manufacturing to ensure environmental and social responsibility.

Study
SustainabilityHigh ImpactModerate effect

Additive Manufacturing Sustainability Assessment Tool Identifies Key Performance Indicators

A structured checklist can help organizations evaluate and improve the sustainability performance of their additive manufacturing processes.

Procedia CIRP · 2019

01

Key Findings

  • 01Additive manufacturing presents opportunities for improved sustainability, but its full potential is often not realized.
  • 02Key sustainability aspects for AM include material usage, energy consumption, waste generation, and end-of-life considerations.
  • 03Specific KPIs are needed to measure and track sustainability performance in AM.
02

Application

Design takeaway

Integrate a sustainability assessment framework into the design and production workflow for additive manufacturing to ensure environmental and social responsibility.

How to apply

Develop or adopt a checklist based on identified sustainability aspects (e.g., material efficiency, energy consumption, waste reduction, recyclability) to evaluate your additive manufacturing projects.

Project actions

  • 01When researching additive manufacturing, specifically look for studies that discuss its environmental impact.
  • 02Consider developing your own sustainability checklist for your design project if it involves additive manufacturing.
03

Method & Evidence

AimHow can a self-assessment tool be developed to evaluate the sustainability performance of additive manufacturing adoption and utilization?
MethodLiterature Review and Framework Development
ProcedureThe research involved a comprehensive review of academic literature, technical reports, and company case studies to identify critical sustainability aspects and key performance indicators (KPIs) relevant to additive manufacturing. This information was synthesized to create a checklist for self-assessment.
ContextManufacturing and Product Development

Variables

IV["Adoption and exploitation of additive manufacturing"]
DV["Sustainability performance"]
CV["Type of additive manufacturing process","Specific materials used","Scale of production"]
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Addresses a timely and relevant issue in manufacturing.
  • +Provides a practical tool (checklist) for industry application.

Limitations

The checklist might not cover every single aspect of sustainability for every type of additive manufacturing process.

Reliability & validity

The reliability of the checklist would depend on the consistency of its application across different users and contexts. Validity would be enhanced by comparing the checklist's findings with actual environmental impact data.

Think critically

How might the 'perspective (graphical)' keyword relate to the development or application of this sustainability assessment tool?

05

Design Principles

"Systematically evaluate the sustainability impact of manufacturing technologies by defining relevant criteria and measurable indicators."

As additive manufacturing (AM) adoption grows, understanding its environmental and social impacts is crucial for responsible design and production. This tool provides a framework for designers and engineers to systematically assess AM's sustainability, moving beyond just efficiency gains.

06

What This Means for Your Design

This research created a checklist to help companies figure out how sustainable their 3D printing processes are, looking at things like how much material they use, energy they consume, and waste they produce.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Reference this study when discussing the environmental considerations of your chosen manufacturing method, especially if it's additive manufacturing.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

Paragraph starter

The adoption and utilization of additive manufacturing (AM) present opportunities for enhanced sustainability within production processes. However, realizing these benefits requires a structured approach to assessment. Research by Gonçalves Machado et al. (2019) proposes a self-assessment tool, developed through a review of existing literature and case studies, to identify critical sustainability aspects and key performance indicators for AM. This framework highlights the importance of evaluating material efficiency, energy consumption, waste generation, and end-of-life management, providing a practical method for designers and manufacturers to benchmark and improve their AM sustainability performance.

09

Source

Procedia CIRP

Additive manufacturing from the sustainability perspective: proposal for a self-assessment tool

journal · 2019

View source

Questions About This Research

What does the research say about additive manufacturing sustainability assessment tool identifies key performance indicators?
Integrate a sustainability assessment framework into the design and production workflow for additive manufacturing to ensure environmental and social responsibility. Evidence: Procedia CIRP (2019).
Why does "Additive Manufacturing Sustainability Assessment Tool Identifies Key Performance Indicators" matter for design?
As additive manufacturing (AM) adoption grows, understanding its environmental and social impacts is crucial for responsible design and production. This tool provides a framework for designers and engineers to systematically assess AM's sustainability, moving beyond just efficiency gains.
How can designers apply this research?
Integrate a sustainability assessment framework into the design and production workflow for additive manufacturing to ensure environmental and social responsibility.
What were the main findings?
Additive manufacturing presents opportunities for improved sustainability, but its full potential is often not realized.. Key sustainability aspects for AM include material usage, energy consumption, waste generation, and end-of-life considerations.. Specific KPIs are needed to measure and track sustainability performance in AM.
What research method was used?
Literature Review and Framework Development.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Moderate effect, based on a 2019 journal from Procedia CIRP.
What should I do differently in my next project?
Develop or adopt a checklist based on identified sustainability aspects (e.g., material efficiency, energy consumption, waste reduction, recyclability) to evaluate your additive manufacturing projects.
What are the limitations?
The tool is based on secondary data and may require adaptation for specific industry contexts or novel AM processes.