Study
Commercial ProductionHigh ImpactModerate effect

Technology adoption significantly enhances mass customization capabilities, with impact varying by market scope.

Firms that strategically adopt relevant technologies can improve their ability to offer customized products at mass production efficiencies, but the specific benefits are moderated by the breadth of their market focus.

Gestão & Produção · 2005

01

Key Findings

  • 01Different technologies have distinct effects on the product capability dimension of mass customization.
  • 02Different technologies have distinct effects on the productivity dimension of mass customization.
  • 03The effect of technology adoption on mass customization dimensions is contingent upon the firm's market scope.
02

Application

Design takeaway

Design and production teams should evaluate technology adoption not just for its general benefits, but for its specific impact on mass customization dimensions and how that aligns with the company's target market.

How to apply

When considering new manufacturing technologies, analyze how they will specifically enable or hinder product customization and productivity, and assess if these changes are appropriate for your current or desired market reach.

Project actions

  • 01When researching technologies for a design project, consider how they support customization and production efficiency.
  • 02Think about how your product's target market might influence the best technology choices for customization.
03

Method & Evidence

AimTo empirically investigate the relationship between technology adoption and mass customization ability, considering the moderating effect of firm market scope.
MethodQuantitative, empirical study
ProcedureSurveyed 315 manufacturers of metal products, machinery, and equipment to collect data on their technology adoption, mass customization dimensions (product capability, productivity), and market scope (narrow vs. broad). Statistical analysis was used to test the hypothesized relationships.
Sample315 participants
ContextManufacturing industry (metal products, machinery, and equipment)

Variables

IVTechnology adoption
DVMass customization ability (product capability, productivity)
CVFirm market scope (narrow vs. broad)
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Empirical validation of theoretical relationships.
  • +Inclusion of market scope as a moderating factor.

Limitations

The study's findings are specific to certain manufacturing sectors and may not apply to digital products or services. The definition of 'technology adoption' is broad.

Reliability & validity

The study's reliability is supported by its large sample size and empirical methodology. Validity is enhanced by testing theoretical relationships and considering moderating variables like market scope.

Think critically

How might the 'market scope' of a digital product or service influence the optimal adoption of technologies for customization, compared to the manufacturing context of this study?

05

Design Principles

"Technology investments for flexible production must be strategically aligned with market strategy to maximize mass customization effectiveness."

Understanding how different technologies influence mass customization (MC) across diverse market scopes is crucial for optimizing production strategies. This insight helps businesses make informed decisions about technology investments to align with their market positioning and achieve competitive advantages in flexible manufacturing.

06

What This Means for Your Design

Adopting the right technology helps companies make customized products efficiently, but what 'right' means depends on whether the company sells to a few specific customers or a wide range of customers.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Reference this study when discussing the strategic selection of manufacturing technologies to support mass customization in your design project's production plan.
  • 2.Use the findings to justify technology choices based on your project's market scope.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

(2005). Effects of technology adoption on mass customization ability of broad and narrow market firms. Gestão & Produção. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-530x2005000300006 Retrieved from https://designdex.org/study/85977b30-d52a-4a92-8efd-284a0bb012e5/technology-adoption-significantly-enhances-mass-customization-capabilities-with-impact-varying-by-market-scope

Paragraph starter

The strategic adoption of technology is critical for enhancing mass customization capabilities. Research indicates that the effectiveness of technology in improving product capability and productivity is significantly influenced by the firm's market scope, suggesting that technology choices must be aligned with whether a company targets a narrow or broad market to achieve optimal results in flexible manufacturing.

09

Source

Gestão & Produção

Effects of technology adoption on mass customization ability of broad and narrow market firms

journal · 2005

View source

Questions about this research

What does the research say about technology adoption significantly enhances mass customization capabilities, with impact varying by market scope?
Design and production teams should evaluate technology adoption not just for its general benefits, but for its specific impact on mass customization dimensions and how that aligns with the company's target market. Evidence: Gestão & Produção (2005).
Why does "Technology adoption significantly enhances mass customization capabilities, with impact varying by market scope." matter for design?
Understanding how different technologies influence mass customization (MC) across diverse market scopes is crucial for optimizing production strategies. This insight helps businesses make informed decisions about technology investments to align with their market positioning and achieve competitive advantages in flexible manufacturing.
How can designers apply this research?
Design and production teams should evaluate technology adoption not just for its general benefits, but for its specific impact on mass customization dimensions and how that aligns with the company's target market.
What were the main findings?
Different technologies have distinct effects on the product capability dimension of mass customization.. Different technologies have distinct effects on the productivity dimension of mass customization.. The effect of technology adoption on mass customization dimensions is contingent upon the firm's market scope.
What research method was used?
Quantitative, empirical study with 315 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Moderate effect, based on a 2005 journal from Gestão & Produção.
What should I do differently in my next project?
When considering new manufacturing technologies, analyze how they will specifically enable or hinder product customization and productivity, and assess if these changes are appropriate for your current or desired market reach.
What are the limitations?
The study focused on specific manufacturing sectors; findings may not generalize to all industries. The study relies on self-reported data, which can be subject to bias. The specific technologies adopted were not detailed, only their general impact.
Is there evidence that mass customization affects design outcomes?
The study found that the technologies a manufacturing firm adopts have a measurable impact on its ability to customize products and maintain productivity, but these impacts differ depending on whether the firm targets a narrow or broad market. Understanding how different technologies influence mass customization (MC) a Source: Gestão & Produção (2005).
Where does this technology adoption research apply?
Manufacturing industry (metal products, machinery, and equipment) It sits within commercial production research on designdex.org.

Related research topics

mass customization design research · evidence on mass customization · does mass customization improve design outcomes · technology adoption studies for designers · mass customization and technology adoption findings · commercial production research evidence