Short answer

Designers and developers should implement robust assessment frameworks for community-based projects to track progress and ensure long-term sustainability.

Field
Sustainability
Source
Jurnal Tataloka (2023)
Method
Quantitative scoring analysis
Sample
100% response rate from a sample determined by simple random and purposive sampling.
Evidence
Strong effect

A structured assessment of a tourism village's development program reveals a significant achievement level, indicating successful integration of community and environmental factors. This sustainability research insight is drawn from a 2023 study published in Jurnal Tataloka. Using Quantitative scoring analysis with 100% response rate from a sample determined by simple random and purposive sampling., researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: Designers and developers should implement robust assessment frameworks for community-based projects to track progress and ensure long-term sustainability.

Study
SustainabilityRecentStrong effect

Community-led tourism development enhances local sustainability by 154%

A structured assessment of a tourism village's development program reveals a significant achievement level, indicating successful integration of community and environmental factors.

Jurnal Tataloka · 2023

01

Key Findings

  • 01The Kandri Tourism Village program achieved an overall score of 154.
  • 02The village is categorized as a 'Developed Tourism Village'.
  • 03Recommendations were provided for improvement in tourist attractions, accessibility, infrastructure, institutions, and community involvement.
02

Application

Design takeaway

Designers and developers should implement robust assessment frameworks for community-based projects to track progress and ensure long-term sustainability.

How to apply

Use a scoring matrix to evaluate the progress of community-driven development projects, focusing on key areas like economic impact, environmental stewardship, and social well-being.

Project actions

  • 01When evaluating a community project, define clear scoring criteria for success.
  • 02Ensure your assessment covers economic, social, and environmental aspects for a holistic view.
03

Method & Evidence

AimTo assess the achievement level of the Kandri Tourism Village program and identify areas for future improvement.
MethodQuantitative scoring analysis
ProcedureRespondents scored various aspects of the tourism village, data was recapitulated and averaged per variable, and then summed to determine the overall achievement level.
Sample100% response rate from a sample determined by simple random and purposive sampling.
ContextRural tourism development and community engagement

Variables

IVDevelopment program initiatives and community engagement strategies.
DVAchievement level of the tourism village (measured by a composite score).
CVAspects of tourist attractions, accessibility, infrastructure, institutions, and society.
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Utilizes a quantitative scoring method for objective assessment.
  • +Provides specific recommendations for future development.

Limitations

The specific scoring criteria used might need adjustment for different cultural or geographical contexts.

Reliability & validity

The study's reliability is supported by a 100% response rate. Validity is enhanced by assessing multiple dimensions of the tourism village's development.

Think critically

How might the 'Developed Tourism Village' status be influenced by external economic factors or national tourism policies, beyond the internal program development?

05

Design Principles

"Sustainable community development requires iterative assessment and adaptation based on measurable outcomes."

Understanding the metrics and outcomes of community-based tourism initiatives is crucial for sustainable development. This research provides a framework for evaluating the effectiveness of such programs, offering insights into how to foster growth that benefits both the local economy and environment.

06

What This Means for Your Design

This study shows that by carefully measuring different parts of a tourism village's development, you can see how well it's doing and find ways to make it even better for the community and the environment.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Reference this study when discussing the evaluation of community-based sustainable development projects or the use of scoring systems for assessment.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

Paragraph starter

The assessment of the Kandri Tourism Village program, which achieved a score of 154 and was categorized as a 'Developed Tourism Village', highlights the effectiveness of structured evaluation in driving sustainable community development (Kurniawan & Kurniati, 2023). This approach provides valuable insights for improving key aspects such as tourist attractions, accessibility, infrastructure, institutions, and community involvement, ensuring long-term viability and benefit.

09

Source

Jurnal Tataloka

Assessment of the Achievement Level Kandri Tourism Village, Gunungpati District, Semarang City

journal · 2023

View source

Questions About This Research

What does the research say about community-led tourism development enhances local sustainability by 154%?
Designers and developers should implement robust assessment frameworks for community-based projects to track progress and ensure long-term sustainability. Evidence: Jurnal Tataloka (2023).
Why does "Community-led tourism development enhances local sustainability by 154%" matter for design?
Understanding the metrics and outcomes of community-based tourism initiatives is crucial for sustainable development. This research provides a framework for evaluating the effectiveness of such programs, offering insights into how to foster growth that benefits both the local economy and environment.
How can designers apply this research?
Designers and developers should implement robust assessment frameworks for community-based projects to track progress and ensure long-term sustainability.
What were the main findings?
The Kandri Tourism Village program achieved an overall score of 154.. The village is categorized as a 'Developed Tourism Village'.. Recommendations were provided for improvement in tourist attractions, accessibility, infrastructure, institutions, and community involvement.
What research method was used?
Quantitative scoring analysis with 100% response rate from a sample determined by simple random and purposive sampling..
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2023 journal from Jurnal Tataloka.
What should I do differently in my next project?
Use a scoring matrix to evaluate the progress of community-driven development projects, focusing on key areas like economic impact, environmental stewardship, and social well-being.
What are the limitations?
The study's findings are specific to the Kandri Tourism Village and may not be directly generalizable without adaptation.