Short answer
Designers of dental materials and educational curricula should consider the practical decision-making processes of practitioners, which are influenced by factors like material type, experience, and perceived ease of use.
- Field
- User-Centred Design
- Source
- Journal of Healthcare Sciences (2022)
- Method
- Systematic Review
- Sample
- 2192 respondents
- Evidence
- Moderate effect
The selection of restorative materials for endodontically treated teeth is not solely based on clinical efficacy but is significantly shaped by the experience level of the dental professional and the accessibility of different material types. This user-centred design research insight is drawn from a 2022 study published in Journal of Healthcare Sciences. Using Systematic review with 2192 respondents, researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: Designers of dental materials and educational curricula should consider the practical decision-making processes of practitioners, which are influenced by factors like material type, experience, and perceived ease of use.
Material choices for endodontically treated teeth are influenced by practitioner experience and material availability
The selection of restorative materials for endodontically treated teeth is not solely based on clinical efficacy but is significantly shaped by the experience level of the dental professional and the accessibility of different material types.
Journal of Healthcare Sciences · 2022
Key Findings
- 01Prefabricated posts (e.g., fiber posts) are preferred over metal posts.
- 02Resin-based cementing agents are the most favored choice.
- 03Composite resin is preferred over amalgam for core foundations.
Application
Design takeaway
Designers of dental materials and educational curricula should consider the practical decision-making processes of practitioners, which are influenced by factors like material type, experience, and perceived ease of use.
How to apply
When designing new restorative materials or systems, consider how they fit into existing workflows and what factors might influence a practitioner's choice over established alternatives.
Project actions
- 01When researching user preferences for a product, consider surveying professionals in the target market.
- 02Investigate what factors beyond pure performance influence their choices (e.g., cost, ease of use, training).
Method & Evidence
Variables
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- +Systematic approach to reviewing existing literature.
- +Inclusion of a large number of respondents across different professional levels.
Limitations
Self-reported data can be biased. The findings are specific to the region studied and may not apply elsewhere.
Reliability & validity
The reliability of the findings depends on the quality and consistency of the original surveys. Validity is enhanced by the systematic review methodology but limited by the self-reported nature of the data.
Think critically
To what extent do the preferences of dental professionals and students reflect the optimal clinical outcomes for patients, and how can design interventions address any discrepancies?
Design Principles
"Material selection should be informed by a balance of clinical evidence, practitioner experience, and material accessibility."
Understanding these influencing factors is crucial for designing educational programs, developing new restorative materials, and optimizing clinical guidelines. It highlights the need to bridge the gap between ideal treatment protocols and practical decision-making in dental practice.
What This Means for Your Design
Dentists and students often choose certain materials for treated teeth based on what's easy to use and available, not just what's best on paper.
How to use in your project
- 1.Use this study to justify investigating user preferences and decision-making factors in your own design project, especially if it involves materials or professional tools.
Add to My Project
Quick Cite
Paragraph starter
This systematic review highlights that material choices in dental practice are influenced by practitioner experience and material availability, suggesting that design and educational strategies should account for these practical considerations when introducing new restorative solutions.
Source
Journal of Healthcare Sciences
Choice of Restorative Materials by Dental Practitioners and Students in Saudi Arabia for Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Systematic Review
journal · 2022
View sourceQuestions About This Research
- What does the research say about material choices for endodontically treated teeth are influenced by practitioner experience and material availability?
- Designers of dental materials and educational curricula should consider the practical decision-making processes of practitioners, which are influenced by factors like material type, experience, and perceived ease of use. Evidence: Journal of Healthcare Sciences (2022).
- Why does "Material choices for endodontically treated teeth are influenced by practitioner experience and material availability" matter for design?
- Understanding these influencing factors is crucial for designing educational programs, developing new restorative materials, and optimizing clinical guidelines. It highlights the need to bridge the gap between ideal treatment protocols and practical decision-making in dental practice.
- How can designers apply this research?
- Designers of dental materials and educational curricula should consider the practical decision-making processes of practitioners, which are influenced by factors like material type, experience, and perceived ease of use.
- What were the main findings?
- Prefabricated posts (e.g., fiber posts) are preferred over metal posts.. Resin-based cementing agents are the most favored choice.. Composite resin is preferred over amalgam for core foundations.
- What research method was used?
- Systematic Review with 2192 respondents.
- How strong is the evidence?
- Evidence strength is rated Moderate effect, based on a 2022 journal from Journal of Healthcare Sciences.
- What should I do differently in my next project?
- When designing new restorative materials or systems, consider how they fit into existing workflows and what factors might influence a practitioner's choice over established alternatives.
- What are the limitations?
- The review is limited to studies conducted in Saudi Arabia and may not represent global trends. The data is based on self-reported preferences, which may not always align with actual clinical practice.