Short answer
When designing eHealth interventions for pressure injury prevention, prioritize user-friendliness, seamless integration into clinical workflows, and clear communication of benefits to ensure sustained adoption.
- Field
- Human Factors
- Source
- International Wound Journal (2025)
- Method
- Scoping Review
- Evidence
- Moderate effect
While a variety of eHealth interventions exist for pressure injury prevention, their long-term adoption is influenced by factors such as usability, integration into existing workflows, and perceived value. This human factors research insight is drawn from a 2025 study published in International Wound Journal. Using Scoping review, researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: When designing eHealth interventions for pressure injury prevention, prioritize user-friendliness, seamless integration into clinical workflows, and clear communication of benefits to ensure sustained adoption.
eHealth Interventions for Pressure Injury Prevention Show Moderate Adoption Potential
While a variety of eHealth interventions exist for pressure injury prevention, their long-term adoption is influenced by factors such as usability, integration into existing workflows, and perceived value.
International Wound Journal · 2025
Key Findings
- 01App-based interventions are the most common type of eHealth solution for pressure injury prevention.
- 02Other interventions include sensor-equipped beds, clinical support algorithms, and continuous sensing devices.
- 03The adoption and sustainability of these interventions are influenced by various factors beyond just the technology itself.
Application
Design takeaway
When designing eHealth interventions for pressure injury prevention, prioritize user-friendliness, seamless integration into clinical workflows, and clear communication of benefits to ensure sustained adoption.
How to apply
When developing or evaluating eHealth tools for healthcare, conduct thorough user research and consider the implementation context, including training needs, IT infrastructure, and potential workflow disruptions.
Project actions
- 01When researching a new product idea, think about how users will actually integrate it into their lives or work.
- 02Consider the 'stickiness' of your design – will people keep using it after the initial novelty wears off?
Method & Evidence
Variables
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- +Comprehensive literature search across multiple databases.
- +Application of a recognized framework (NASSS) for evaluating interventions.
Limitations
The availability of eHealth interventions may be limited in certain healthcare settings due to cost or infrastructure.
Reliability & validity
The reliability of the review depends on the thoroughness of the search strategy and the consistent application of the NASSS framework. Validity is supported by the breadth of literature included and the use of a structured evaluation tool.
Think critically
How can designers proactively address the 'abandonment' phase of an eHealth intervention's lifecycle during the initial design and development stages?
Design Principles
"Technological solutions must be designed with a deep understanding of user needs, existing practices, and systemic factors to achieve successful adoption and long-term impact."
Understanding the adoption barriers and facilitators of eHealth interventions is crucial for designers and developers aiming to create effective and sustainable solutions. This insight highlights the need to move beyond mere technological novelty to address the human and systemic factors that determine whether an intervention will be successfully implemented and maintained.
What This Means for Your Design
Lots of new tech is being made to stop bedsores, especially phone apps. But just making the tech isn't enough; people need to actually use it and keep using it, which depends on how easy it is to use and if it fits into their daily routines.
How to use in your project
- 1.Use this research to justify why you are focusing on user adoption and integration in your design process, not just the technical features.
Add to My Project
Quick Cite
Paragraph starter
This scoping review highlights that the successful implementation of eHealth interventions for pressure injury prevention is contingent upon factors beyond mere technological advancement, emphasizing the critical role of user adoption and integration into existing practices. Therefore, the design process for this project will prioritize user-centered development and consider the practicalities of long-term use within the target environment.
Source
International Wound Journal
Evaluation of <scp>eHealth</scp> Interventions to Prevent Pressure Injuries: A Scoping Review
journal · 2025
View sourceQuestions About This Research
- What does the research say about ehealth interventions for pressure injury prevention show moderate adoption potential?
- When designing eHealth interventions for pressure injury prevention, prioritize user-friendliness, seamless integration into clinical workflows, and clear communication of benefits to ensure sustained adoption. Evidence: International Wound Journal (2025).
- Why does "eHealth Interventions for Pressure Injury Prevention Show Moderate Adoption Potential" matter for design?
- Understanding the adoption barriers and facilitators of eHealth interventions is crucial for designers and developers aiming to create effective and sustainable solutions. This insight highlights the need to move beyond mere technological novelty to address the human and systemic factors that determine whether an intervention will be successfully implemented and maintained.
- How can designers apply this research?
- When designing eHealth interventions for pressure injury prevention, prioritize user-friendliness, seamless integration into clinical workflows, and clear communication of benefits to ensure sustained adoption.
- What were the main findings?
- App-based interventions are the most common type of eHealth solution for pressure injury prevention.. Other interventions include sensor-equipped beds, clinical support algorithms, and continuous sensing devices.. The adoption and sustainability of these interventions are influenced by various factors beyond just the technology itself.
- What research method was used?
- Scoping Review.
- How strong is the evidence?
- Evidence strength is rated Moderate effect, based on a 2025 journal from International Wound Journal.
- What should I do differently in my next project?
- When developing or evaluating eHealth tools for healthcare, conduct thorough user research and consider the implementation context, including training needs, IT infrastructure, and potential workflow disruptions.
- What are the limitations?
- The review's findings are based on published literature, which may not capture all interventions or their real-world adoption challenges. The NASSS framework application is interpretive.