Built Environment Professionals Show Moderate Awareness of Regenerative Circularity, High Potential for Improvement
Professionals in the built environment demonstrate a foundational understanding of regenerative and circular economy principles but require enhanced tools and practices for effective implementation.
Buildings · 2022
Key Findings
- 01Built environment professionals have an average level of awareness regarding regenerative and circular economy concepts.
- 02There is significant room for improvement in the practical application of these approaches within the sector.
- 03Sustainability assessment tools need enhancement in areas such as performance requirements, flexibility, adaptability, and stakeholder engagement.
Application
Design takeaway
Integrate principles of flexibility, adaptability, and robust performance metrics into design strategies and assessment tools to better support regenerative and circular approaches in the built environment.
How to apply
When developing or evaluating sustainability assessment tools, ensure they explicitly address performance requirements, adaptability, and engagement mechanisms for regenerative and circular design.
Project actions
- 01When researching sustainable design, consider how professionals actually implement these ideas.
- 02Critically evaluate existing assessment tools for their effectiveness in promoting circularity and regenerative practices.
Method & Evidence
Variables
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- +Utilizes a mixed-methods approach for comprehensive data collection.
- +Addresses a timely and critical topic in sustainable development.
Limitations
The sample size and global distribution might not represent all regional contexts or specific professional disciplines within the built environment.
Reliability & validity
The mixed-methods approach enhances validity by triangulating findings from quantitative and qualitative data. Reliability would depend on the consistency of coding and analysis procedures.
Think critically
To what extent do the identified limitations in assessment tools hinder innovation in regenerative and circular design, and what alternative evaluation methods could be explored?
Design Principles
"Design for adaptability and circularity by incorporating flexible systems and measurable performance indicators for regenerative outcomes."
This research highlights a critical gap between awareness and actionable practice in sustainable construction. Designers and engineers can leverage these findings to develop more robust assessment tools and educational resources that bridge this gap, fostering a more widespread adoption of regenerative circularity.
What This Means for Your Design
People who design buildings and cities know a bit about making them sustainable and reusable, but they don't always do it, and the current ways we check if buildings are sustainable could be better.
How to use in your project
- 1.Reference this study when discussing the current state of sustainable design adoption and the need for improved assessment methodologies in your design project.
Add to My Project
Quick Cite
(2022). Inquiry on Perceptions and Practices of Built Environment Professionals Regarding Regenerative and Circular Approaches. Buildings. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13010063 Retrieved from https://designdex.org/study/97d0e7ea-d7da-4c5d-817c-11c86f9f3e31/built-environment-professionals-show-moderate-awareness-of-regenerative-circularity-high-potential-for-improvement
Paragraph starter
Research indicates that while built environment professionals possess moderate awareness of regenerative and circular economy principles, significant opportunities exist to enhance their practical application. Current sustainability assessment tools often require improvement in areas such as performance requirements, flexibility, and adaptability to effectively support these advanced approaches, suggesting a need for more integrated and robust evaluation frameworks in design practice.
Source
Buildings
Inquiry on Perceptions and Practices of Built Environment Professionals Regarding Regenerative and Circular Approaches
journal · 2022
View sourceQuestions about this research
- What does the research say about built environment professionals show moderate awareness of regenerative circularity, high potential for improvement?
- Integrate principles of flexibility, adaptability, and robust performance metrics into design strategies and assessment tools to better support regenerative and circular approaches in the built environment. Evidence: Buildings (2022).
- Why does "Built Environment Professionals Show Moderate Awareness of Regenerative Circularity, High Potential for Improvement" matter for design?
- This research highlights a critical gap between awareness and actionable practice in sustainable construction. Designers and engineers can leverage these findings to develop more robust assessment tools and educational resources that bridge this gap, fostering a more widespread adoption of regenerative circularity.
- How can designers apply this research?
- Integrate principles of flexibility, adaptability, and robust performance metrics into design strategies and assessment tools to better support regenerative and circular approaches in the built environment.
- What were the main findings?
- Built environment professionals have an average level of awareness regarding regenerative and circular economy concepts.. There is significant room for improvement in the practical application of these approaches within the sector.. Sustainability assessment tools need enhancement in areas such as performance requirements, flexibility, adaptability, and stakeholder engagement.
- What research method was used?
- Convergent mixed methods approach with 146 questionnaire responses, 18 interviews.
- How strong is the evidence?
- Evidence strength is rated Moderate effect, based on a 2022 journal from Buildings.
- What should I do differently in my next project?
- When developing or evaluating sustainability assessment tools, ensure they explicitly address performance requirements, adaptability, and engagement mechanisms for regenerative and circular design.
- What are the limitations?
- The study's findings may be influenced by the specific geographic and professional backgrounds of the participants, and the 'average' awareness might mask significant variations within the professional community.
- Is there evidence that built environment affects design outcomes?
- While professionals are somewhat familiar with regenerative and circular design, their actual implementation is limited, and current assessment tools are not fully equipped to support these advanced sustainability strategies. This research highlights a critical gap between awareness and actionable practice in sustainab Source: Buildings (2022).
- Where does this regenerative circular research apply?
- Built environment sector (architecture, engineering, construction, urban planning) It sits within sustainability research on designdex.org.
Related research topics
built environment design research · evidence on built environment · does built environment improve design outcomes · regenerative circular studies for designers · built environment and regenerative circular findings · sustainability research evidence