Short answer

Design systems and protocols that minimize the need for repeated identity disclosure and proactively acknowledge intersecting identities to create a more welcoming and effective service experience.

Field
User-Centred Design
Source
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2020)
Method
Qualitative research
Sample
Not explicitly stated, but implied to be multiple participants across four focus groups.
Evidence
Strong effect

Individuals with multiple intersecting identities, such as LGBTIQA+ people with disabilities, face significant challenges when repeatedly disclosing these identities to access services, highlighting a critical gap in current inclusive practices. This user-centred design research insight is drawn from a 2020 study published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Using Qualitative research with Not explicitly stated, but implied to be multiple participants across four focus groups., researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: Design systems and protocols that minimize the need for repeated identity disclosure and proactively acknowledge intersecting identities to create a more welcoming and effective service experience.

Study
User-Centred DesignHigh ImpactStrong effect

Dual Identity Disclosure in Healthcare: Navigating Complex Needs for Inclusive Service Design

Individuals with multiple intersecting identities, such as LGBTIQA+ people with disabilities, face significant challenges when repeatedly disclosing these identities to access services, highlighting a critical gap in current inclusive practices.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2020

01

Key Findings

  • 01Participants experienced difficulties in managing and presenting their multiple identities (LGBTIQA+ and disability) to service providers.
  • 02The repeated need to 'come out' in various contexts was a complex and layered process that hindered the full expression of needs and experiences.
  • 03Community support played a vital role in fostering a sense of belonging, resilience, and capacity for health service navigation and advocacy.
02

Application

Design takeaway

Design systems and protocols that minimize the need for repeated identity disclosure and proactively acknowledge intersecting identities to create a more welcoming and effective service experience.

How to apply

When designing any service that interacts with diverse user groups, consider how users with multiple, potentially marginalized identities will navigate disclosure and ensure that systems are built to be sensitive to these complexities from the outset.

Project actions

  • 01When researching user needs, actively seek out participants with intersecting identities to understand their unique challenges.
  • 02Consider how your design might inadvertently create barriers for users with multiple marginalized identities.
  • 03Involve users with diverse backgrounds throughout the design process, not just at the beginning.
03

Method & Evidence

AimHow do LGBTIQA+ individuals with disabilities experience the process of disclosing their multiple identities when accessing healthcare and community services, and what are the impacts of these experiences on their engagement with these services?
MethodQualitative research
ProcedureFour focus groups were conducted with LGBTIQA+ individuals with disabilities to explore their experiences with healthcare and community services, specifically focusing on identity disclosure and its implications.
SampleNot explicitly stated, but implied to be multiple participants across four focus groups.
ContextHealthcare and community services in Victoria, Australia.

Variables

IVThe process of identity disclosure within healthcare and community services.
DVUser experiences, engagement with services, sense of belonging, and resilience.
CVFocus group setting, geographical location (Victoria, Australia), and the nature of the services being accessed.
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Utilizes a qualitative approach to gain in-depth understanding of lived experiences.
  • +Involves peer researchers who share the identities of the participants, potentially fostering trust and richer data.
  • +Addresses a critical and often overlooked intersection of identities.

Limitations

The focus group method might not capture the full range of individual experiences, and the specific context of Australian services may limit direct applicability elsewhere without adaptation.

Reliability & validity

Reliability could be enhanced by using standardized interview protocols within focus groups. Validity is strengthened by the use of peer researchers and the focus on lived experiences, though triangulation with other data sources could further improve it.

Think critically

To what extent do current 'inclusive' design frameworks adequately address the complexities of intersecting identities, and what specific design interventions can mitigate the burden of repeated disclosure for users with multiple marginalized identities?

05

Design Principles

"Design for intersectionality: Acknowledge and accommodate the complex interplay of multiple identities in user experiences."

Understanding the layered disclosure process is crucial for designing services that are genuinely inclusive. Current approaches often fail to acknowledge the cognitive and emotional burden of managing multiple identity disclosures, leading to user frustration and potential disengagement from essential services.

06

What This Means for Your Design

People who are part of more than one minority group (like being both LGBTIQA+ and having a disability) find it hard when they have to explain all parts of who they are every time they try to get help. Services need to be better at understanding this and making it easier for people to get the support they need without feeling like they have to keep proving who they are.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Use this research to justify the need for inclusive design practices that go beyond surface-level accommodations.
  • 2.Cite this study when discussing the importance of user research with diverse and intersectional populations.
  • 3.Incorporate findings on identity disclosure into your user personas and journey maps.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

Paragraph starter

This research underscores the critical need for design practices that acknowledge and accommodate intersectionality. The experiences of LGBTIQA+ individuals with disabilities reveal that current service models often impose a burden of repeated identity disclosure, hindering effective access and support. Therefore, future design projects must prioritize the development of systems and protocols that proactively recognize and integrate multiple identities, thereby fostering genuine inclusivity and user-centered experiences.

09

Source

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Experiences of LGBTIQA+ People with Disability in Healthcare and Community Services: Towards Embracing Multiple Identities

journal · 2020

View source

Questions About This Research

What does the research say about dual identity disclosure in healthcare: navigating complex needs for inclusive service design?
Design systems and protocols that minimize the need for repeated identity disclosure and proactively acknowledge intersecting identities to create a more welcoming and effective service experience. Evidence: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2020).
Why does "Dual Identity Disclosure in Healthcare: Navigating Complex Needs for Inclusive Service Design" matter for design?
Understanding the layered disclosure process is crucial for designing services that are genuinely inclusive. Current approaches often fail to acknowledge the cognitive and emotional burden of managing multiple identity disclosures, leading to user frustration and potential disengagement from essential services.
How can designers apply this research?
Design systems and protocols that minimize the need for repeated identity disclosure and proactively acknowledge intersecting identities to create a more welcoming and effective service experience.
What were the main findings?
Participants experienced difficulties in managing and presenting their multiple identities (LGBTIQA+ and disability) to service providers.. The repeated need to 'come out' in various contexts was a complex and layered process that hindered the full expression of needs and experiences.. Community support played a vital role in fostering a sense of belonging, resilience, and capacity for health service navigation and advocacy.
What research method was used?
Qualitative research with Not explicitly stated, but implied to be multiple participants across four focus groups..
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2020 journal from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
What should I do differently in my next project?
When designing any service that interacts with diverse user groups, consider how users with multiple, potentially marginalized identities will navigate disclosure and ensure that systems are built to be sensitive to these complexities from the outset.
What are the limitations?
Findings are specific to the context of Victoria, Australia, and may not be directly generalizable to all geographical or cultural settings. The study relies on self-reported experiences, which can be subject to individual interpretation.