Short answer
When designing for circularity, consider how your design can be supported or hindered by industry collaborations and policy incentives, and how internal SME capabilities can be leveraged.
- Field
- Sustainability
- Source
- Management Review Quarterly (2023)
- Method
- Systematic Literature Review (SLR) using the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) framework.
- Evidence
- Strong effect
SMEs can successfully transition to a circular economy by considering and integrating factors across micro (internal), meso (industry/regional), and macro (societal/policy) levels. This sustainability research insight is drawn from a 2023 study published in Management Review Quarterly. Using Systematic literature review (slr) using the multi-level perspective (mlp) framework., researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: When designing for circularity, consider how your design can be supported or hindered by industry collaborations and policy incentives, and how internal SME capabilities can be leveraged.
Circular Economy Transition for SMEs Requires Multi-Level Strategic Alignment
SMEs can successfully transition to a circular economy by considering and integrating factors across micro (internal), meso (industry/regional), and macro (societal/policy) levels.
Management Review Quarterly · 2023
Key Findings
- 01Micro-level factors (e.g., internal resources, knowledge, leadership) are crucial for initial adoption.
- 02Meso-level factors (e.g., industry networks, supply chain collaboration, regional initiatives) facilitate scaling and systemic change.
- 03Macro-level factors (e.g., policy frameworks, societal norms, technological advancements) create the enabling environment for widespread CE adoption.
Application
Design takeaway
When designing for circularity, consider how your design can be supported or hindered by industry collaborations and policy incentives, and how internal SME capabilities can be leveraged.
How to apply
When developing a circular product or service for an SME, map out the internal resources, potential industry partners, and relevant government policies that could impact its success.
Project actions
- 01When researching a design problem, consider the broader context beyond just the user.
- 02Think about how your design might interact with industry standards or regulations.
Method & Evidence
Variables
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- +Comprehensive systematic review methodology.
- +Application of the robust Multi-Level Perspective framework.
Limitations
It can be challenging to gather comprehensive data on all three levels (micro, meso, macro) for a specific design project.
Reliability & validity
The reliability of the SLR is enhanced by its systematic approach. Validity is supported by the use of a well-established theoretical framework (MLP) to analyze diverse literature.
Think critically
How might a design intervention aimed at improving product longevity within an SME be more successful if it also addresses supply chain collaboration and leverages existing waste management infrastructure?
Design Principles
"Circular design solutions must be contextually aware of micro, meso, and macro environmental factors."
This research highlights that a siloed approach to circularity is insufficient for SMEs. Designers and businesses need to understand the interconnectedness of internal capabilities, industry collaborations, and broader policy landscapes to foster effective circular design and business models.
What This Means for Your Design
To make something circular (like recycling or reusing materials), small businesses need to think about what they can do themselves, how they can work with other companies, and what rules or support systems are in place around them.
How to use in your project
- 1.Reference this study when discussing the external factors that influence the feasibility of your design solutions, particularly in relation to sustainability goals.
Add to My Project
Quick Cite
Paragraph starter
The transition of SMEs towards a circular economy is influenced by a complex interplay of factors across multiple levels. As highlighted by Ahmadov et al. (2023), a successful circular strategy requires SMEs to address internal capabilities (micro-level), foster collaborations within their industry and region (meso-level), and operate within supportive policy and societal frameworks (macro-level). This multi-perspective approach is essential for designing and implementing circular solutions that are both effective and sustainable.
Source
Management Review Quarterly
SMEs on the way to a circular economy: insights from a multi-perspective review
journal · 2023
View sourceQuestions About This Research
- What does the research say about circular economy transition for smes requires multi-level strategic alignment?
- When designing for circularity, consider how your design can be supported or hindered by industry collaborations and policy incentives, and how internal SME capabilities can be leveraged. Evidence: Management Review Quarterly (2023).
- Why does "Circular Economy Transition for SMEs Requires Multi-Level Strategic Alignment" matter for design?
- This research highlights that a siloed approach to circularity is insufficient for SMEs. Designers and businesses need to understand the interconnectedness of internal capabilities, industry collaborations, and broader policy landscapes to foster effective circular design and business models.
- How can designers apply this research?
- When designing for circularity, consider how your design can be supported or hindered by industry collaborations and policy incentives, and how internal SME capabilities can be leveraged.
- What were the main findings?
- Micro-level factors (e.g., internal resources, knowledge, leadership) are crucial for initial adoption.. Meso-level factors (e.g., industry networks, supply chain collaboration, regional initiatives) facilitate scaling and systemic change.. Macro-level factors (e.g., policy frameworks, societal norms, technological advancements) create the enabling environment for widespread CE adoption.
- What research method was used?
- Systematic Literature Review (SLR) using the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) framework..
- How strong is the evidence?
- Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2023 journal from Management Review Quarterly.
- What should I do differently in my next project?
- When developing a circular product or service for an SME, map out the internal resources, potential industry partners, and relevant government policies that could impact its success.
- What are the limitations?
- The review's findings are based on existing literature, and the specific challenges and opportunities can vary significantly between different industries and geographical regions.