Short answer

Designers should consider the dynamic relationships within a home, not just the static needs of its inhabitants, to create more responsive and integrated solutions.

Field
User-Centred Design
Source
Journal of Business Anthropology (2014)
Method
Theoretical exploration and case example analysis.
Evidence
Moderate effect

The concept of 'home' is not static but is continuously shaped by the interactions between people and their environment, including non-human elements. This user-centred design research insight is drawn from a 2014 study published in Journal of Business Anthropology. Using Theoretical exploration and case example analysis., researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: Designers should consider the dynamic relationships within a home, not just the static needs of its inhabitants, to create more responsive and integrated solutions.

Study
User-Centred DesignHigh ImpactModerate effect

Home as a Dynamic, Co-Created Space

The concept of 'home' is not static but is continuously shaped by the interactions between people and their environment, including non-human elements.

Journal of Business Anthropology · 2014

01

Key Findings

  • 01The perception of stability in homes within consumer research is often an artifact of brief observation periods.
  • 02Homes are actively produced through the ongoing interactions of human and non-human actors.
  • 03A more fluid understanding of 'home' can lead to richer research possibilities and more habitable designs.
02

Application

Design takeaway

Designers should consider the dynamic relationships within a home, not just the static needs of its inhabitants, to create more responsive and integrated solutions.

How to apply

When designing for domestic spaces, observe and document the ongoing interactions between people, objects, and the environment over time, rather than assuming a fixed state.

Project actions

  • 01Consider how the objects you design will interact with existing items in a user's home.
  • 02Think about how a product's use might change over time and how the home environment might adapt to it.
03

Method & Evidence

AimHow can understanding 'home' as a dynamic, co-created space between human and non-human actors enrich design research and practice?
MethodTheoretical exploration and case example analysis.
ProcedureThe paper examines theoretical frameworks from scholars like Latour and Ingold to deconstruct the notion of 'home'. It uses examples to illustrate how human and non-human elements actively shape and are shaped by the domestic environment, proposing a more fluid understanding of place.
ContextConsumer anthropology and domestic environments.

Variables

IVTheoretical frameworks of 'home' as a co-created space.
DVRicher design possibilities and greater habitability.
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Provides a nuanced theoretical lens for understanding domestic spaces.
  • +Challenges conventional, static views of users and their environments.

Limitations

It can be challenging to capture the full complexity of 'home' in a short design project.

Reliability & validity

The validity lies in its theoretical contribution to understanding complex social phenomena. Reliability is less applicable as it's not an empirical study in the traditional sense.

Think critically

To what extent can a designer truly account for the 'flux' and 'indeterminacy' of a home in a single design intervention?

05

Design Principles

"Design for emergent use and co-creation within domestic environments."

Understanding home as a fluid and co-created space challenges traditional research approaches that might view it as a fixed backdrop. This perspective encourages designers to consider the evolving relationships and activities within a domestic setting, leading to more adaptable and contextually relevant design solutions.

06

What This Means for Your Design

Think of your home not just as a place where things happen, but as a living thing that changes as you and your stuff interact with it.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Use this research to justify a user-centred approach that accounts for the dynamic nature of the user's environment.
  • 2.Reference this paper when discussing the context of use for your design.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

Paragraph starter

This research highlights that 'home' is not a static environment but a dynamic space co-created by human and non-human actors. This perspective is crucial for understanding user behaviour and designing products that integrate effectively into the evolving context of domestic life, moving beyond a simplistic view of user needs to embrace the fluid nature of habitability.

09

Source

Journal of Business Anthropology

Homes and Paths: Notes on Finding Place in Consumer Anthropology

journal · 2014

View source

Questions About This Research

What does the research say about home as a dynamic, co-created space?
Designers should consider the dynamic relationships within a home, not just the static needs of its inhabitants, to create more responsive and integrated solutions. Evidence: Journal of Business Anthropology (2014).
Why does "Home as a Dynamic, Co-Created Space" matter for design?
Understanding home as a fluid and co-created space challenges traditional research approaches that might view it as a fixed backdrop. This perspective encourages designers to consider the evolving relationships and activities within a domestic setting, leading to more adaptable and contextually relevant design solutions.
How can designers apply this research?
Designers should consider the dynamic relationships within a home, not just the static needs of its inhabitants, to create more responsive and integrated solutions.
What were the main findings?
The perception of stability in homes within consumer research is often an artifact of brief observation periods.. Homes are actively produced through the ongoing interactions of human and non-human actors.. A more fluid understanding of 'home' can lead to richer research possibilities and more habitable designs.
What research method was used?
Theoretical exploration and case example analysis..
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Moderate effect, based on a 2014 journal from Journal of Business Anthropology.
What should I do differently in my next project?
When designing for domestic spaces, observe and document the ongoing interactions between people, objects, and the environment over time, rather than assuming a fixed state.
What are the limitations?
The paper is primarily theoretical and relies on existing case examples rather than new empirical data collection.