Short answer

When designing and producing apparel, actively assess and improve the environmental impact of both material choices and manufacturing processes, especially for locally sourced products.

Field
Sustainability
Source
Textiles and Clothing Sustainability (2015)
Method
Comparative analysis and eco-friendliness testing using a standardized tool (Higg Index).
Evidence
Moderate effect

Local apparel brands often exhibit lower environmental sustainability scores compared to established brands due to less rigorous material sourcing and manufacturing processes. This sustainability research insight is drawn from a 2015 study published in Textiles and Clothing Sustainability. Using Comparative analysis and eco-friendliness testing using a standardized tool (higg index)., researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: When designing and producing apparel, actively assess and improve the environmental impact of both material choices and manufacturing processes, especially for locally sourced products.

Study
SustainabilityHigh ImpactModerate effect

Local T-shirt Brands Lag Behind in Environmental Sustainability

Local apparel brands often exhibit lower environmental sustainability scores compared to established brands due to less rigorous material sourcing and manufacturing processes.

Textiles and Clothing Sustainability · 2015

01

Key Findings

  • 01Brands A, B, C, and D achieved better environmental sustainability results (higher scores).
  • 02Local brands E and F demonstrated poor environmental sustainability with lower scores.
  • 03Weaknesses and opportunities for improvement were identified in material and manufacturing stages.
02

Application

Design takeaway

When designing and producing apparel, actively assess and improve the environmental impact of both material choices and manufacturing processes, especially for locally sourced products.

How to apply

When developing new apparel products or evaluating existing ones, use tools like the Higg Index to benchmark environmental performance and identify areas for improvement in materials and manufacturing.

Project actions

  • 01When choosing materials for your design project, research their environmental impact.
  • 02Consider the manufacturing process and its potential environmental consequences.
03

Method & Evidence

AimTo evaluate the environmental sustainability of apparel products, specifically knitted T-shirts, focusing on base materials and manufacturing processes.
MethodComparative analysis and eco-friendliness testing using a standardized tool (Higg Index).
ProcedureEco-friendliness tests were conducted on base materials of selected T-shirt products from various brands. These products were then assessed using the Higg Index tool to evaluate their overall environmental sustainability.
ContextApparel industry, specifically knitted T-shirt production in Bangladesh.

Variables

IV["Brand origin (local vs. established)","Material type","Manufacturing process"]
DV["Environmental sustainability score (via Higg Index)","Eco-friendliness test results"]
CV["Product type (knitted T-shirt)","Manufacturing region (Bangladesh)"]
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Utilized a standardized tool (Higg Index) for consistent evaluation.
  • +Compared multiple brands, including local and established ones.

Limitations

The environmental impact of a product can be complex to measure fully, and data availability for specific materials or processes might be limited.

Reliability & validity

The use of the Higg Index provides a degree of standardized validity. However, reliability could be enhanced by using multiple assessment tools or by having multiple assessors evaluate the products.

Think critically

To what extent can a single standardized tool like the Higg Index accurately capture the multifaceted environmental impact of an apparel product across its entire lifecycle?

05

Design Principles

"Environmental sustainability in apparel design requires a holistic approach, encompassing material selection, production methods, and supply chain management."

This insight highlights a critical gap in the sustainability performance of locally produced goods. Designers and manufacturers must recognize that consumer and regulatory pressures for eco-friendly products are increasing globally, impacting market competitiveness.

06

What This Means for Your Design

Some T-shirt brands are much better for the environment than others, especially when they are made locally. This is because they might use worse materials or have less eco-friendly factories.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Use this study to justify the importance of evaluating the environmental impact of materials and manufacturing in your design project.
  • 2.Refer to the Higg Index as a potential tool for assessing sustainability in your own research.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

Paragraph starter

This research highlights the critical importance of evaluating the environmental sustainability of both base materials and manufacturing processes in apparel production. Findings suggest that local brands may lag behind established ones in eco-friendly practices, underscoring the need for designers and manufacturers to proactively integrate sustainability assessments, such as those facilitated by tools like the Higg Index, into their design and production workflows to drive towards more responsible industry growth.

09

Source

Textiles and Clothing Sustainability

Materials and manufacturing environmental sustainability evaluation of apparel product: knitted T-shirt case study

journal · 2015

View source

Questions About This Research

What does the research say about local t-shirt brands lag behind in environmental sustainability?
When designing and producing apparel, actively assess and improve the environmental impact of both material choices and manufacturing processes, especially for locally sourced products. Evidence: Textiles and Clothing Sustainability (2015).
Why does "Local T-shirt Brands Lag Behind in Environmental Sustainability" matter for design?
This insight highlights a critical gap in the sustainability performance of locally produced goods. Designers and manufacturers must recognize that consumer and regulatory pressures for eco-friendly products are increasing globally, impacting market competitiveness.
How can designers apply this research?
When designing and producing apparel, actively assess and improve the environmental impact of both material choices and manufacturing processes, especially for locally sourced products.
What were the main findings?
Brands A, B, C, and D achieved better environmental sustainability results (higher scores).. Local brands E and F demonstrated poor environmental sustainability with lower scores.. Weaknesses and opportunities for improvement were identified in material and manufacturing stages.
What research method was used?
Comparative analysis and eco-friendliness testing using a standardized tool (Higg Index)..
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Moderate effect, based on a 2015 journal from Textiles and Clothing Sustainability.
What should I do differently in my next project?
When developing new apparel products or evaluating existing ones, use tools like the Higg Index to benchmark environmental performance and identify areas for improvement in materials and manufacturing.
What are the limitations?
The study focused on a specific product type (knitted T-shirts) and a particular manufacturing region (Bangladesh), which may limit the generalizability of findings to other apparel categories or geographical locations.