Study
Innovation & DesignHigh ImpactModerate effect

Re:organizational Aesthetics: Artists Disrupting Business Models for Novel Applications

Artists are adopting and subverting corporate structures and business models to critique, recontextualize, and ultimately innovate within economic and cultural systems.

Digital WPI · 2015

01

Key Findings

  • 01Artists use corporate structures for 'identity correction' and critique.
  • 02Art practices expose and interrogate the pervasiveness of corporate and legal language.
  • 03Mimicking business models allows artists to disrupt and repurpose them for new contexts.
  • 04These practices offer opportunities for unexpected connections and redesign of economic/cultural landscapes.
02

Application

Design takeaway

Consider how established business models or organizational structures can be playfully or critically subverted to uncover novel design opportunities and user experiences.

How to apply

Analyze a common business model in your field, identify its core assumptions, and brainstorm ways to parody, disrupt, or repurpose its elements for a new design project.

Project actions

  • 01Look at how artists have used 'corporate speak' or business structures in their work.
  • 02Consider how you can 'parody' or 'disrupt' a common design process or business model in your own project.
03

Method & Evidence

AimHow do artists employ and subvert corporate structures and business models to create new aesthetic and functional outcomes?
MethodQualitative analysis of artist practices and theoretical framework application.
ProcedureThe research examines artist projects that parody corporations, critique corporate language, and mimic emerging business models. It draws on theoretical concepts like deterritorialization and rhizome to analyze how these practices disrupt and recontextualize economic systems, proposing the term 're:organizational aesthetics'.
ContextContemporary visual arts and business culture.

Variables

IVArtistic strategies (parody, critique, mimicry of business models).
DVOutcomes of artistic practices (identity correction, exposure of language, disruption of models, new applications).
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Provides a novel perspective on the intersection of art and business.
  • +Introduces a new term ('re:organizational aesthetics') to describe a growing trend.

Limitations

The artistic context might be very different from a commercial design project, so direct translation of methods may not always be straightforward.

Reliability & validity

The validity relies on the interpretation of artistic intent and the theoretical application. Reliability would be low as artistic practices are unique.

Think critically

To what extent can artistic subversion of business models be directly translated into commercially viable design solutions, and what are the ethical considerations involved?

05

Design Principles

"Critically engage with and creatively subvert existing systems to foster innovation and recontextualize established practices."

Understanding how artists leverage and transform business paradigms offers valuable insights for designers and innovators. This approach can inspire new strategies for product development, organizational design, and market disruption by encouraging a critical yet creative engagement with existing systems.

06

What This Means for Your Design

Artists are using business ideas in funny or critical ways to make people think differently about how companies work, and this can give designers new ideas.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Reference this research when discussing how you've critically engaged with existing design conventions or business models in your project.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

(2015). Professional Parody: An Examination of Artist Practices Parodying and Disrupting Business Models to New Ends. Digital WPI. Retrieved from https://designdex.org/study/b8aebc3a-7165-4269-b46e-e4cc68018d2d/re-organizational-aesthetics-artists-disrupting-business-models-for-novel-applications

Paragraph starter

The concept of 're:organizational aesthetics' highlights how artists subvert and repurpose business models, offering a valuable framework for designers to critically examine and creatively disrupt established conventions within their own design practice, leading to innovative outcomes.

09

Source

Digital WPI

Professional Parody: An Examination of Artist Practices Parodying and Disrupting Business Models to New Ends

journal · 2015

View source

Questions about this research

What does the research say about re:organizational aesthetics: artists disrupting business models for novel applications?
Consider how established business models or organizational structures can be playfully or critically subverted to uncover novel design opportunities and user experiences. Evidence: Digital WPI (2015).
Why does "Re:organizational Aesthetics: Artists Disrupting Business Models for Novel Applications" matter for design?
Understanding how artists leverage and transform business paradigms offers valuable insights for designers and innovators. This approach can inspire new strategies for product development, organizational design, and market disruption by encouraging a critical yet creative engagement with existing systems.
How can designers apply this research?
Consider how established business models or organizational structures can be playfully or critically subverted to uncover novel design opportunities and user experiences.
What were the main findings?
Artists use corporate structures for 'identity correction' and critique.. Art practices expose and interrogate the pervasiveness of corporate and legal language.. Mimicking business models allows artists to disrupt and repurpose them for new contexts.. These practices offer opportunities for unexpected connections and redesign of economic/cultural landscapes.
What research method was used?
Qualitative analysis of artist practices and theoretical framework application..
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Moderate effect, based on a 2015 journal from Digital WPI.
What should I do differently in my next project?
Analyze a common business model in your field, identify its core assumptions, and brainstorm ways to parody, disrupt, or repurpose its elements for a new design project.
What are the limitations?
The focus is primarily on visual arts; the direct applicability to all design disciplines may vary. The theoretical framework might require adaptation for different contexts.
Is there evidence that business models affects design outcomes?
Artists are creatively repurposing business models and corporate structures, not just to critique them, but to find new ways of operating and to inspire broader societal and economic redesign. Understanding how artists leverage and transform business paradigms offers valuable insights for designers and innovators. This Source: Digital WPI (2015).
Where does this disrupting business research apply?
Contemporary visual arts and business culture. It sits within innovation & design research on designdex.org.

Related research topics

business models design research · evidence on business models · does business models improve design outcomes · disrupting business studies for designers · business models and disrupting business findings · innovation & design research evidence