Short answer

Incorporate a multi-dimensional value assessment framework that includes economic, social, and environmental factors, considering the perspectives of project owners, teams, and the public, from the earliest stages of public infrastructure design.

Field
Innovation & Markets
Source
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business (2025)
Method
Conceptual Framework Development and Expert Validation
Evidence
Moderate effect

Integrating economic, social, and environmental dimensions across project owner, team, and public perspectives during the design phase can significantly increase the perceived value of public infrastructure. This innovation & markets research insight is drawn from a 2025 study published in International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. Using Conceptual framework development and expert validation, researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: Incorporate a multi-dimensional value assessment framework that includes economic, social, and environmental factors, considering the perspectives of project owners, teams, and the public, from the earliest stages of public infrastructure design.

Study
Innovation & MarketsNew This WeekModerate effect

Multi-Stakeholder Framework Enhances Public Infrastructure Value Beyond Economics

Integrating economic, social, and environmental dimensions across project owner, team, and public perspectives during the design phase can significantly increase the perceived value of public infrastructure.

International Journal of Managing Projects in Business · 2025

01

Key Findings

  • 01A comprehensive understanding of value in public infrastructure requires integrating economic, social, and environmental dimensions.
  • 02Considering value generation across project owner, project team, and public levels provides a more holistic perspective.
  • 03The proposed framework offers a practical tool for enhancing sustainable value during the design phase.
02

Application

Design takeaway

Incorporate a multi-dimensional value assessment framework that includes economic, social, and environmental factors, considering the perspectives of project owners, teams, and the public, from the earliest stages of public infrastructure design.

How to apply

When designing public infrastructure, create a matrix that maps potential economic, social, and environmental benefits and drawbacks against the expectations and needs of project owners, the project team, and the general public. Use this to inform design choices.

Project actions

  • 01Clearly define the different stakeholder groups relevant to your design project.
  • 02Consider how your design impacts not only the user but also the wider community and environment.
03

Method & Evidence

AimHow can a multi-stakeholder framework, considering economic, social, and environmental dimensions at project owner, team, and public levels, enhance the design of sustainable value in public infrastructure projects?
MethodConceptual Framework Development and Expert Validation
ProcedureA conceptual framework was developed by synthesizing literature on sustainable development and stakeholder theory. This framework was then refined and validated through expert interviews and subsequently tested using a real-life case study of a public infrastructure project.
ContextPublic infrastructure project design

Variables

IV["Application of a multi-stakeholder framework","Integration of economic, social, and environmental dimensions"]
DV["Perceived value of public infrastructure","Sustainability of project value"]
CV["Type of public infrastructure project","Project phase (design phase)"]
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Integrates multiple dimensions of value (economic, social, environmental).
  • +Considers value from multiple stakeholder perspectives (owner, team, public).

Limitations

It can be challenging to quantify social and environmental value objectively. Gathering comprehensive stakeholder input can be time-consuming and complex.

Reliability & validity

The framework's validity was supported by expert interviews and a case study. Reliability would depend on consistent application of the framework's assessment criteria across different projects and assessors.

Think critically

To what extent can a single framework truly capture the diverse and potentially conflicting values held by different stakeholder groups in complex public infrastructure projects?

05

Design Principles

"Design for holistic value by integrating diverse stakeholder perspectives and sustainability dimensions throughout the project lifecycle."

Traditional project evaluation often prioritizes economic returns. This research highlights the critical need to incorporate broader value considerations from the outset, involving all key stakeholders, to ensure public infrastructure projects truly serve societal needs and are perceived as valuable by the communities they impact.

06

What This Means for Your Design

When designing big public projects like bridges or parks, it's not just about the money. You need to think about how it helps people (socially), the environment, and the people who own the project and the people who will use it.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Reference this framework when discussing the broader impact and value proposition of your design solution, particularly if it addresses public needs or sustainability concerns.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

Paragraph starter

This research highlights the importance of a multi-stakeholder framework for public infrastructure design, emphasizing the integration of economic, social, and environmental value dimensions. By considering the perspectives of project owners, teams, and the public, designers can create solutions that offer more comprehensive and sustainable value.

09

Source

International Journal of Managing Projects in Business

From perceptions to value: a multi-stakeholder framework for public infrastructure design

journal · 2025

View source

Questions About This Research

What does the research say about multi-stakeholder framework enhances public infrastructure value beyond economics?
Incorporate a multi-dimensional value assessment framework that includes economic, social, and environmental factors, considering the perspectives of project owners, teams, and the public, from the earliest stages of public infrastructure design. Evidence: International Journal of Managing Projects in Business (2025).
Why does "Multi-Stakeholder Framework Enhances Public Infrastructure Value Beyond Economics" matter for design?
Traditional project evaluation often prioritizes economic returns. This research highlights the critical need to incorporate broader value considerations from the outset, involving all key stakeholders, to ensure public infrastructure projects truly serve societal needs and are perceived as valuable by the communities they impact.
How can designers apply this research?
Incorporate a multi-dimensional value assessment framework that includes economic, social, and environmental factors, considering the perspectives of project owners, teams, and the public, from the earliest stages of public infrastructure design.
What were the main findings?
A comprehensive understanding of value in public infrastructure requires integrating economic, social, and environmental dimensions.. Considering value generation across project owner, project team, and public levels provides a more holistic perspective.. The proposed framework offers a practical tool for enhancing sustainable value during the design phase.
What research method was used?
Conceptual Framework Development and Expert Validation.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Moderate effect, based on a 2025 journal from International Journal of Managing Projects in Business.
What should I do differently in my next project?
When designing public infrastructure, create a matrix that maps potential economic, social, and environmental benefits and drawbacks against the expectations and needs of project owners, the project team, and the general public. Use this to inform design choices.
What are the limitations?
The framework's applicability might vary depending on the specific type and scale of public infrastructure projects. The validation through expert interviews and a single case study may limit generalizability.