Short answer
Implement a multi-layered safety management system that addresses systemic factors, not just immediate operational risks, to significantly reduce hoisting accidents in IBS construction.
- Field
- Human Factors
- Source
- Heliyon (2023)
- Method
- Case study and AcciMap analysis
- Sample
- 105 accidents
- Evidence
- Strong effect
A comprehensive analysis of hoisting accidents in Industrial Building System (IBS) construction identified 36 distinct safety risk factors across multiple systemic levels, highlighting the need for a multi-dimensional approach to safety management. This human factors research insight is drawn from a 2023 study published in Heliyon. Using Case study and accimap analysis with 105 accidents, researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: Implement a multi-layered safety management system that addresses systemic factors, not just immediate operational risks, to significantly reduce hoisting accidents in IBS construction.
Systemic Risk Analysis Reveals 36 Safety Factors in IBS Hoisting Operations
A comprehensive analysis of hoisting accidents in Industrial Building System (IBS) construction identified 36 distinct safety risk factors across multiple systemic levels, highlighting the need for a multi-dimensional approach to safety management.
Heliyon · 2023
Key Findings
- 01Southeast coastal region of China had the highest frequency of hoisting accidents.
- 02Truck-mounted cranes and tower cranes were the most frequently involved machinery.
- 03Common accident types included hoisting load off, crane machinery capsizing, and workers falling from height.
- 04Average direct economic loss per accident was approximately RMB 2.43 million, with an average of 1.543 deaths and 0.829 injuries.
- 0536 safety risk factors were identified across six domains, influenced by systemic levels from government policies to individual worker actions.
Application
Design takeaway
Implement a multi-layered safety management system that addresses systemic factors, not just immediate operational risks, to significantly reduce hoisting accidents in IBS construction.
How to apply
When designing or managing construction processes involving heavy lifting, systematically review the 36 identified risk factors and their interrelationships to proactively mitigate potential hazards.
Project actions
- 01When analyzing a design problem, consider all the systems that interact with it, not just the user and the product.
- 02Use accident analysis frameworks like AcciMap to understand complex failure modes in existing designs or processes.
Method & Evidence
Variables
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- +Comprehensive accident data analysis.
- +Application of a robust systemic risk analysis framework (AcciMap).
- +Quantification of accident impacts (economic loss, fatalities, injuries).
Limitations
The specific risk factors identified are context-dependent on IBS construction in China. Generalizing them to other construction types or regions requires careful consideration.
Reliability & validity
The study's validity is supported by the use of a large accident dataset and a recognized risk analysis methodology. Reliability would depend on the consistency of data collection and the interpretation of the AcciMap.
Think critically
How might the identified risk factors differ in construction projects that do not use Industrial Building Systems (IBS), and what new factors might emerge?
Design Principles
"Safety is a systemic property influenced by multiple interacting factors across organizational and societal levels."
Understanding the root causes of accidents, beyond immediate human error, is crucial for designing safer construction processes. This research provides a framework for identifying and mitigating systemic risks, leading to improved worker well-being and reduced economic losses in complex construction projects.
What This Means for Your Design
This study looked at why construction cranes sometimes have accidents. It found that it's not just one person's fault, but a mix of problems at different levels, like bad planning, equipment issues, and even government rules. They identified 36 specific things that can go wrong.
How to use in your project
- 1.Reference this study when discussing the importance of a holistic approach to safety and risk assessment in your design project.
- 2.Use the identified risk factors as a framework for your own hazard analysis.
Add to My Project
Quick Cite
Paragraph starter
This research highlights the critical importance of a systemic approach to safety in construction, identifying 36 distinct risk factors across multiple levels of influence in IBS hoisting operations. By moving beyond individual blame to analyze the complex interplay of organizational, technological, and societal factors, designers can develop more effective safety protocols and mitigate potential accidents, thereby reducing human and economic costs.
Source
Heliyon
Identification and analysis of hoisting safety risk factors for IBS construction based on the AcciMap and cases study
journal · 2023
View sourceQuestions About This Research
- What does the research say about systemic risk analysis reveals 36 safety factors in ibs hoisting operations?
- Implement a multi-layered safety management system that addresses systemic factors, not just immediate operational risks, to significantly reduce hoisting accidents in IBS construction. Evidence: Heliyon (2023).
- Why does "Systemic Risk Analysis Reveals 36 Safety Factors in IBS Hoisting Operations" matter for design?
- Understanding the root causes of accidents, beyond immediate human error, is crucial for designing safer construction processes. This research provides a framework for identifying and mitigating systemic risks, leading to improved worker well-being and reduced economic losses in complex construction projects.
- How can designers apply this research?
- Implement a multi-layered safety management system that addresses systemic factors, not just immediate operational risks, to significantly reduce hoisting accidents in IBS construction.
- What were the main findings?
- Southeast coastal region of China had the highest frequency of hoisting accidents.. Truck-mounted cranes and tower cranes were the most frequently involved machinery.. Common accident types included hoisting load off, crane machinery capsizing, and workers falling from height.. Average direct economic loss per accident was approximately RMB 2.43 million, with an average of 1.543 deaths and 0.829 injuries.
- What research method was used?
- Case study and AcciMap analysis with 105 accidents.
- How strong is the evidence?
- Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2023 journal from Heliyon.
- What should I do differently in my next project?
- When designing or managing construction processes involving heavy lifting, systematically review the 36 identified risk factors and their interrelationships to proactively mitigate potential hazards.
- What are the limitations?
- The study focused on accidents in China, and findings may not be directly generalizable to all construction contexts without adaptation. The AcciMap analysis is qualitative and relies on expert interpretation.