Short answer

Prioritize the user's subjective experience of connectivity by integrating elements that enhance perceived safety, accessibility, and visual appeal in the design of urban park networks.

Field
Classic Design
Source
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2023)
Method
Systematic Literature Review
Evidence
Moderate effect

The way users perceive the connections between urban parks, encompassing accessibility, safety, and aesthetics, is as crucial as the physical links for fostering engagement. This classic design research insight is drawn from a 2023 study published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Using Systematic literature review, researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: Prioritize the user's subjective experience of connectivity by integrating elements that enhance perceived safety, accessibility, and visual appeal in the design of urban park networks.

Study
Classic DesignRecentModerate effect

Perceived connectedness of urban parks significantly impacts user experience and engagement.

The way users perceive the connections between urban parks, encompassing accessibility, safety, and aesthetics, is as crucial as the physical links for fostering engagement.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2023

01

Key Findings

  • 01Urban park connectedness can be understood through 'physical connectedness' (road and park attributes like accessibility, street environment, facilities) and 'perceived connectedness' (user perceptions of accessibility, safety, aesthetics).
  • 02Individual attributes such as sociodemographic factors and activity motivations influence how users experience park connectedness.
02

Application

Design takeaway

Prioritize the user's subjective experience of connectivity by integrating elements that enhance perceived safety, accessibility, and visual appeal in the design of urban park networks.

How to apply

When designing or redesigning urban parks and their connecting pathways, conduct user surveys or focus groups to understand their perceptions of safety, accessibility, and aesthetic qualities. Use this feedback to inform design decisions regarding lighting, landscaping, signage, and path design.

Project actions

  • 01When researching user needs for a park design, include questions about their feelings of safety and ease of access.
  • 02Consider how the surrounding environment (streets, buildings) impacts the perception of the park's connection to the neighborhood.
03

Method & Evidence

AimTo understand how users perceive the connectedness of urban parks, considering both physical and perceptual factors.
MethodSystematic Literature Review
ProcedureA systematic review of 54 studies published between 2017 and 2022 was conducted using PRISMA protocol, analyzing research from Scopus and Web of Science databases.
ContextUrban planning and design of public green spaces.

Variables

IV["Physical attributes of parks and their surroundings (e.g., road attributes, park attributes, accessibility, street connectivity, street environment, spatial scale, facilities, natural elements).","User perceptions (e.g., perceived accessibility, perceived safety, aesthetics).","Individual attributes (e.g., sociodemographic factors, motivation for activity)."]
DV["User connectedness with urban parks.","User engagement with urban parks."]
CV["Study context (urban parks).","Research methodology (systematic literature review)."]
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Comprehensive review of recent literature.
  • +Introduction of distinct concepts of physical and perceived connectedness.

Limitations

The review's findings are generalized from existing research and may not perfectly apply to every specific urban context or user group.

Reliability & validity

The systematic review methodology, following PRISMA, enhances the reliability and validity of the findings by ensuring a structured and reproducible approach to literature selection and analysis. However, the validity of the synthesized findings is dependent on the quality and scope of the original studies included.

Think critically

How might the emphasis on 'perceived connectedness' by users lead to design decisions that conflict with purely ecological or functional objectives for urban parks?

05

Design Principles

"Design for perceived connectivity: Ensure that the physical design of urban spaces actively supports and enhances users' positive perceptions of accessibility, safety, and aesthetic quality."

Understanding user perception of park connectivity moves beyond purely functional or ecological considerations. It highlights the importance of designing spaces that feel inviting, safe, and easy to navigate, thereby encouraging more frequent and meaningful use of urban green spaces.

06

What This Means for Your Design

How people feel about getting to and being in parks is just as important as how easy it actually is. Making parks feel safe and look nice makes people want to use them more.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Use the concepts of 'physical connectedness' and 'perceived connectedness' to structure your user research and analysis.
  • 2.Incorporate findings on perceived safety and aesthetics when justifying design choices for your project.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

Paragraph starter

This research highlights the importance of 'perceived connectedness' in urban park design, suggesting that user experience is significantly influenced by subjective factors such as perceived safety and aesthetics, in addition to physical accessibility. This implies that design interventions should aim to foster positive user perceptions to enhance engagement with public green spaces.

09

Source

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Connectedness among Urban Parks from the Users’ Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review

journal · 2023

View source

Questions About This Research

What does the research say about perceived connectedness of urban parks significantly impacts user experience and engagement?
Prioritize the user's subjective experience of connectivity by integrating elements that enhance perceived safety, accessibility, and visual appeal in the design of urban park networks. Evidence: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2023).
Why does "Perceived connectedness of urban parks significantly impacts user experience and engagement." matter for design?
Understanding user perception of park connectivity moves beyond purely functional or ecological considerations. It highlights the importance of designing spaces that feel inviting, safe, and easy to navigate, thereby encouraging more frequent and meaningful use of urban green spaces.
How can designers apply this research?
Prioritize the user's subjective experience of connectivity by integrating elements that enhance perceived safety, accessibility, and visual appeal in the design of urban park networks.
What were the main findings?
Urban park connectedness can be understood through 'physical connectedness' (road and park attributes like accessibility, street environment, facilities) and 'perceived connectedness' (user perceptions of accessibility, safety, aesthetics).. Individual attributes such as sociodemographic factors and activity motivations influence how users experience park connectedness.
What research method was used?
Systematic Literature Review.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Moderate effect, based on a 2023 journal from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
What should I do differently in my next project?
When designing or redesigning urban parks and their connecting pathways, conduct user surveys or focus groups to understand their perceptions of safety, accessibility, and aesthetic qualities. Use this feedback to inform design decisions regarding lighting, landscaping, signage, and path design.
What are the limitations?
The review is based on existing literature, and findings may be influenced by the biases and scope of the included studies. Direct user testing of specific design interventions was not part of this review.