Study
Innovation & MarketsHigh ImpactStrong effect

Economic Stability Increased by 43% Due to Policy, Shocks, and Luck

The volatility of economic activity in the US significantly decreased between 1960-1983 and 1984-2001, with improved policy, favorable economic shocks, and unforeseen positive events contributing to this 'great moderation'.

National Bureau of Economic Research · 2002

01

Key Findings

  • 01Economic volatility (measured by the standard deviation of real GDP growth rates) decreased from 2.7% (1960-1983) to 1.6% (1984-2001).
  • 02Improved policy contributed an estimated 20-30% to this reduction in volatility.
  • 03Favorable productivity and commodity price shocks accounted for an estimated 20-30%.
  • 04Other unidentified positive shocks ('good luck') explained the remaining 40-60%.
02

Application

Design takeaway

Designers should be aware that economic environments can shift in stability, influencing market receptiveness and investment potential, and should adapt their strategies accordingly.

How to apply

When planning product launches or market entry strategies, consider the prevailing economic climate and its potential for stability or volatility. Factor in potential policy changes or external shocks that could affect market demand.

Project actions

  • 01When researching your target market, consider the broader economic trends and their potential impact on consumer spending.
  • 02If your design project is long-term, consider how economic fluctuations might affect its feasibility or market success.
03

Method & Evidence

AimWhat factors contributed to the significant decrease in economic volatility in the United States between 1960-1983 and 1984-2001?
MethodEconometric analysis of time series data
ProcedureAnalyzed a large number of US economic time series data from 1960-2001, using various statistical methods to characterize time-varying processes and quantify the impact of different explanatory factors on economic volatility.
ContextMacroeconomics, Economic Policy, Market Analysis

Variables

IV["Time periods (1960-1983 vs. 1984-2001)","Economic policy changes","Productivity shocks","Commodity price shocks"]
DV["Standard deviation of annual growth rates in real GDP (economic volatility)"]
CV["United States economic data"]
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Uses a large dataset of US economic time series.
  • +Employs a variety of statistical methods to analyze time-varying processes.

Limitations

This study focuses on the US economy and uses historical data, so its findings might not directly apply to other countries or future economic conditions.

Reliability & validity

The study's reliability is supported by the use of multiple statistical methods and a comprehensive dataset. Validity is enhanced by the attempt to attribute volatility changes to specific factors, though the 'good luck' component introduces some uncertainty.

Think critically

To what extent can design projects mitigate risks associated with economic volatility, and how might design choices themselves contribute to or buffer against economic fluctuations?

05

Design Principles

"Economic stability influences market predictability, impacting the risk appetite for design innovation and investment."

Understanding shifts in economic stability is crucial for strategic planning in design and innovation. Periods of greater economic stability can foster more predictable market conditions, encouraging investment in longer-term, potentially riskier design projects. Conversely, increased volatility necessitates adaptive strategies and a focus on resilience.

06

What This Means for Your Design

The economy became much less 'bumpy' over time, meaning big ups and downs were less common. This was partly because of better government decisions, some lucky breaks with things like new technology, and other good things happening that we can't fully explain.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Use this research to justify why a particular economic climate might be favorable or unfavorable for your design project's market viability.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

(2002). Has the Business Cycle Changed and Why?. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9127 Retrieved from https://designdex.org/study/ef1638f2-5bb6-4556-9267-e110716e30b4/economic-stability-increased-by-43-due-to-policy-shocks-and-luck

Paragraph starter

Economic analysis indicates that periods of reduced market volatility, such as the 'great moderation' observed in the US from 1984-2001, can be influenced by policy, external shocks, and unforeseen factors. This suggests that the market conditions for design projects are not static and can be affected by macroeconomic trends, impacting investment decisions and consumer receptiveness.

09

Source

National Bureau of Economic Research

Has the Business Cycle Changed and Why?

journal · 2002

View source

Questions about this research

What does the research say about economic stability increased by 43% due to policy, shocks, and luck?
Designers should be aware that economic environments can shift in stability, influencing market receptiveness and investment potential, and should adapt their strategies accordingly. Evidence: National Bureau of Economic Research (2002).
Why does "Economic Stability Increased by 43% Due to Policy, Shocks, and Luck" matter for design?
Understanding shifts in economic stability is crucial for strategic planning in design and innovation. Periods of greater economic stability can foster more predictable market conditions, encouraging investment in longer-term, potentially riskier design projects. Conversely, increased volatility necessitates adaptive strategies and a focus on resilience.
How can designers apply this research?
Designers should be aware that economic environments can shift in stability, influencing market receptiveness and investment potential, and should adapt their strategies accordingly.
What were the main findings?
Economic volatility (measured by the standard deviation of real GDP growth rates) decreased from 2.7% (1960-1983) to 1.6% (1984-2001).. Improved policy contributed an estimated 20-30% to this reduction in volatility.. Favorable productivity and commodity price shocks accounted for an estimated 20-30%.. Other unidentified positive shocks ('good luck') explained the remaining 40-60%.
What research method was used?
Econometric analysis of time series data.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2002 journal from National Bureau of Economic Research.
What should I do differently in my next project?
When planning product launches or market entry strategies, consider the prevailing economic climate and its potential for stability or volatility. Factor in potential policy changes or external shocks that could affect market demand.
What are the limitations?
The study relies on historical data and statistical models, and the exact attribution of 'good luck' is inherently uncertain. The findings are specific to the US economy during the studied period.
Is there evidence that economic stability affects design outcomes?
Economic activity in the US became substantially less volatile, with a significant portion of this 'great moderation' attributed to a combination of better economic policies, beneficial external shocks, and a degree of good fortune. Understanding shifts in economic stability is crucial for strategic planning in design Source: National Bureau of Economic Research (2002).
Where does this stability increased research apply?
Macroeconomics, Economic Policy, Market Analysis It sits within innovation & markets research on designdex.org.

Related research topics

economic stability design research · evidence on economic stability · does economic stability improve design outcomes · stability increased studies for designers · economic stability and stability increased findings · innovation & markets research evidence