Short answer

Designers must move beyond generic health promotion and deeply understand the lived experiences and environmental contexts of their target users, especially when addressing health inequalities.

Field
User-Centred Design
Source
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (2025)
Method
Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature
Evidence
Moderate effect

Understanding the nuanced interplay of capability, opportunity, and motivation, as perceived by older adults from lower socio-economic backgrounds, is crucial for designing effective physical activity interventions. This user-centred design research insight is drawn from a 2025 study published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. Using Systematic review of qualitative literature, researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: Designers must move beyond generic health promotion and deeply understand the lived experiences and environmental contexts of their target users, especially when addressing health inequalities.

Study
User-Centred DesignNew This WeekModerate effect

Socio-economic status significantly shapes older adults' motivations and opportunities for physical activity.

Understanding the nuanced interplay of capability, opportunity, and motivation, as perceived by older adults from lower socio-economic backgrounds, is crucial for designing effective physical activity interventions.

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · 2025

01

Key Findings

  • 01Low-SES older adults' physical capability is influenced by health, fitness, and mobility.
  • 02Psychological capability is shaped by knowledge and self-regulation.
  • 03Physical opportunity is affected by safety, infrastructure, and access to facilities.
  • 04Social opportunity is linked to social support, norms, and engagement.
  • 05Motivation is driven by outcome expectancies, self-efficacy, attitudes, habits, time constraints, and enjoyment.
02

Application

Design takeaway

Designers must move beyond generic health promotion and deeply understand the lived experiences and environmental contexts of their target users, especially when addressing health inequalities.

How to apply

When designing a community fitness program or a health-tracking app for older adults, conduct user research specifically with individuals from lower socio-economic backgrounds to identify and address their unique challenges and preferences.

Project actions

  • 01When researching user needs, ensure your sample represents a range of socio-economic backgrounds.
  • 02Consider how environmental factors like public transport or park safety might impact a user's ability to engage with your design.
03

Method & Evidence

AimWhat are the modifiable enablers and barriers to physical activity from the perspective of low-socio-economic status older adults, and how do these differ from those of higher socio-economic status older adults?
MethodSystematic Review of Qualitative Literature
ProcedureA systematic search of five electronic databases was conducted for qualitative studies involving UK-based, community-dwelling older adults (60+ years) reporting physical activity enablers and barriers by socio-economic status. Risk of bias was assessed, and framework synthesis using the COM-B model was applied.
ContextPhysical activity promotion for older adults, with a focus on socio-economic disparities.

Variables

IVSocio-economic status
DVPhysical activity enablers and barriers (capability, opportunity, motivation)
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Comprehensive synthesis of qualitative data provides rich insights into user perspectives.
  • +Application of the COM-B model offers a structured framework for understanding behaviour change.

Limitations

It can be challenging to recruit participants from very specific socio-economic groups, and their willingness to share personal financial or health information may vary.

Reliability & validity

The systematic review methodology, including risk of bias assessment and framework synthesis, enhances the reliability and validity of the synthesized findings.

Think critically

How might a designer ethically and effectively gather sensitive information about socio-economic status and its impact on user behaviour without alienating participants?

05

Design Principles

"Design for inclusivity by accounting for diverse socio-economic factors that influence user behaviour and access."

Designers creating products, services, or environments aimed at promoting physical activity in older populations must recognize that a one-size-fits-all approach is insufficient. Tailoring solutions to address specific socio-economic barriers and leverage existing enablers can lead to more equitable and successful outcomes.

06

What This Means for Your Design

The way older people can and want to be active depends a lot on their money, where they live, and who they know. Designs need to think about these differences.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Use this research to justify the need for user research with specific demographic groups in your design project.
  • 2.Incorporate findings about capability, opportunity, and motivation into your user persona development.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

Paragraph starter

This systematic review underscores the critical influence of socio-economic status on older adults' engagement with physical activity, identifying key enablers and barriers related to capability, opportunity, and motivation. These findings are essential for informing the design of interventions that are not only effective but also equitable, by acknowledging and addressing the diverse lived experiences and environmental contexts of target user groups.

09

Source

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Enablers and barriers to physical activity among older adults of low socio-economic status: a systematic review of qualitative literature

journal · 2025

View source

Questions About This Research

What does the research say about socio-economic status significantly shapes older adults' motivations and opportunities for physical activity?
Designers must move beyond generic health promotion and deeply understand the lived experiences and environmental contexts of their target users, especially when addressing health inequalities. Evidence: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (2025).
Why does "Socio-economic status significantly shapes older adults' motivations and opportunities for physical activity." matter for design?
Designers creating products, services, or environments aimed at promoting physical activity in older populations must recognize that a one-size-fits-all approach is insufficient. Tailoring solutions to address specific socio-economic barriers and leverage existing enablers can lead to more equitable and successful outcomes.
How can designers apply this research?
Designers must move beyond generic health promotion and deeply understand the lived experiences and environmental contexts of their target users, especially when addressing health inequalities.
What were the main findings?
Low-SES older adults' physical capability is influenced by health, fitness, and mobility.. Psychological capability is shaped by knowledge and self-regulation.. Physical opportunity is affected by safety, infrastructure, and access to facilities.. Social opportunity is linked to social support, norms, and engagement.
What research method was used?
Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Moderate effect, based on a 2025 journal from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.
What should I do differently in my next project?
When designing a community fitness program or a health-tracking app for older adults, conduct user research specifically with individuals from lower socio-economic backgrounds to identify and address their unique challenges and preferences.
What are the limitations?
Few studies directly compared low and high SES groups, limiting the depth of understanding of specific differences.