Short answer

When designing educational initiatives focused on wellbeing, adopt a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach that addresses systemic factors, not just individual student needs.

Field
Innovation & Design
Source
Frontiers in Public Health (2024)
Method
Framework development and case study implementation
Evidence
Strong effect

The PRICES model provides a structured, multi-component framework for effectively integrating social and emotional learning (SEL) programs into educational settings to enhance the mental health and wellbeing of students and educators. This innovation & design research insight is drawn from a 2024 study published in Frontiers in Public Health. Using Framework development and case study implementation, researchers explored how this design variable affects real-world outcomes. The key design takeaway: When designing educational initiatives focused on wellbeing, adopt a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach that addresses systemic factors, not just individual student needs.

Study
Innovation & DesignRecentStrong effect

The PRICES Model: A Framework for Integrating Social-Emotional Learning in Educational Systems

The PRICES model provides a structured, multi-component framework for effectively integrating social and emotional learning (SEL) programs into educational settings to enhance the mental health and wellbeing of students and educators.

Frontiers in Public Health · 2024

01

Key Findings

  • 01A whole-school approach to mental health and wellbeing promotion is critical.
  • 02The PRICES framework offers a structured method for implementing SEL programs.
  • 03Integration of SEL alongside academic learning fosters holistic development.
  • 04Educator support and student voice are essential components for successful implementation.
02

Application

Design takeaway

When designing educational initiatives focused on wellbeing, adopt a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach that addresses systemic factors, not just individual student needs.

How to apply

Use the PRICES framework as a checklist or guiding structure when designing or evaluating educational programs aimed at improving student and staff wellbeing.

Project actions

  • 01Consider how your design project can address multiple aspects of wellbeing, not just one.
  • 02Think about how to involve different groups within your target setting (e.g., students, teachers, administrators).
03

Method & Evidence

AimHow can a comprehensive framework be developed and operationalized to promote mental health and wellbeing through social and emotional learning in educational settings?
MethodFramework development and case study implementation
ProcedureThe authors developed the PRICES framework (Preparation and Access, Restoration, Integration, Connection and Community, Educator Support, Strengths-Based Cultivation and Student Voice) and illustrated its application through co-development with the SEE Learning program in educational contexts.
ContextEducational settings (schools, universities)

Variables

IV["Implementation of the PRICES framework components (Preparation, Restoration, Integration, Connection, Educator Support, Strengths-Based Cultivation, Student Voice)"]
DV["Student mental health and wellbeing","Educator mental health and wellbeing","Overall school climate"]
CV["Type of educational setting","Existing school policies on wellbeing","Resources available for SEL programs"]
04

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • +Provides a comprehensive and actionable framework.
  • +Emphasizes a whole-school, systemic approach.
  • +Integrates theoretical concepts with practical implementation examples.

Limitations

The PRICES model is a framework; its effectiveness will depend heavily on the specific context and resources of each educational institution. The paper does not provide quantitative data on the impact of the model itself.

Reliability & validity

The validity of the PRICES model lies in its comprehensive nature, drawing on established principles of SEL and health promotion. Reliability would depend on consistent application across different educational settings and the fidelity of implementation of its components.

Think critically

To what extent can a standardized framework like PRICES be universally applied across diverse educational settings with varying cultural contexts and resource levels?

05

Design Principles

"Holistic wellbeing integration requires a structured, multi-component framework that addresses preparation, integration, community, educator support, and student agency."

This research offers a practical, actionable model for educational institutions aiming to move beyond purely academic outcomes. By systematically addressing preparation, integration, community, educator support, and student voice, the PRICES framework can guide the development and implementation of more holistic and effective wellbeing initiatives.

06

What This Means for Your Design

This research gives us a step-by-step plan (called PRICES) for schools to help students and teachers feel better mentally and emotionally, not just focus on grades.

How to use in your project

  • 1.Reference the PRICES model when discussing the holistic approach or systematic implementation of your design solution for wellbeing.
  • 2.Use the components of the PRICES model to structure your research or design process, ensuring all key areas are considered.
07

Add to My Project

08

Quick Cite

Paragraph starter

The PRICES model, as presented by Frazier and Doyle Fosco (2024), offers a robust framework for integrating social and emotional learning (SEL) into educational settings. This model emphasizes a whole-school approach, addressing key areas such as preparation, integration, community, educator support, and student voice to foster holistic wellbeing. Applying such a structured approach can ensure that design interventions are comprehensive and address the multifaceted nature of mental health promotion within educational environments.

09

Source

Frontiers in Public Health

Nurturing positive mental health and wellbeing in educational settings – the PRICES model

journal · 2024

View source

Questions About This Research

What does the research say about the prices model: a framework for integrating social-emotional learning in educational systems?
When designing educational initiatives focused on wellbeing, adopt a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach that addresses systemic factors, not just individual student needs. Evidence: Frontiers in Public Health (2024).
Why does "The PRICES Model: A Framework for Integrating Social-Emotional Learning in Educational Systems" matter for design?
This research offers a practical, actionable model for educational institutions aiming to move beyond purely academic outcomes. By systematically addressing preparation, integration, community, educator support, and student voice, the PRICES framework can guide the development and implementation of more holistic and effective wellbeing initiatives.
How can designers apply this research?
When designing educational initiatives focused on wellbeing, adopt a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach that addresses systemic factors, not just individual student needs.
What were the main findings?
A whole-school approach to mental health and wellbeing promotion is critical.. The PRICES framework offers a structured method for implementing SEL programs.. Integration of SEL alongside academic learning fosters holistic development.. Educator support and student voice are essential components for successful implementation.
What research method was used?
Framework development and case study implementation.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence strength is rated Strong effect, based on a 2024 journal from Frontiers in Public Health.
What should I do differently in my next project?
Use the PRICES framework as a checklist or guiding structure when designing or evaluating educational programs aimed at improving student and staff wellbeing.
What are the limitations?
The paper focuses on the implementation of SEL programs and may not cover all aspects of mental health promotion in educational settings. Specific outcomes related to academic performance are not detailed.